Open

Coming up

Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

#THE 51%

Sweden: A Feminist's Paradise?

Read more

FOCUS

Ireland's missing babies cast light on dark history

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

A thin line between fact-checking and propaganda in Gaza social media coverage

Read more

DEBATE

Gaza: How to Stop the Spiral? Israel Readies For Ground Offensive (part 2)

Read more

DEBATE

Gaza: How to Stop the Spiral? Israel Readies For Ground Offensive

Read more

WEB NEWS

World Cup 2014: Germany-Brazil inspires the Web

Read more

THE INTERVIEW

Boutros-Ghali: 'I wanted to reform the UN'

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

57 000 little problems

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

The Sarkozy 'threat'

Read more

  • Video: Palestinians fear full Israeli military offensive in Gaza

    Read more

  • Video: Living in Tel Aviv, under threat of rocket attack

    Read more

  • Manhunt as FIFA partner flees Rio hotel to avoid arrest

    Read more

  • US prepared to negotiate Gaza ceasefire, Obama says

    Read more

  • French companies will have to accept anonymous CVs

    Read more

  • Ukrainian forces close in on Donetsk

    Read more

  • Germany asks US intelligence station chief to leave country

    Read more

  • UN chief Ban Ki-moon appoints new Syria mediator

    Read more

  • Video: Muslims in China confront obstacles to Ramadan fasting

    Read more

  • Tour de France passes WWI Chemin des Dames battlefield

    Read more

  • Senegalese man awarded French visa in gay marriage debate

    Read more

  • Argentina beat Netherlands on penalties to reach World Cup final

    Read more

  • Foiled French jihadist ‘targeted Louvre and Eiffel Tower’

    Read more

  • Obama in Texas to urge congressional action on child migrant crisis

    Read more

  • Iraq’s heritage 'in danger' from ISIS militants

    Read more

Prince Harry homeward bound

©

Latest update : 2008-03-01

Prince Harry left Afghanistan after news of his 10-week tour was leaked by foreign media, the defence ministry in London confirmed.



LONDON, Feb 29 (Reuters) - Britain's Prince Harry flew out
of Afghanistan on Friday after news leaked that he had been 
fighting on the frontline for 10 weeks, defence sources said.
 

The 23-year-old grandson of Queen Elizabeth and third in
line to the throne left Afghanistan prematurely amid fears for
his security and for those soldiers fighting alongside him.
 

He was sent to Afghanistan in December. But for security
reasons and in agreement with the Ministry of Defence, the
British media did not report the deployment.
 

That agreement collapsed after Web sites in Australia,
Germany and the United States leaked the news on Thursday.
 

The ministry said the decision to withdraw him was "taken
primarily on the basis that the worldwide media coverage of
Prince Harry in Afghanistan could impact on the security of
those who are deployed there, as well as the risks to him as an
individual soldier".
 

Harry, the son of Prince Charles and the late Princess
Diana, has been active during his 10 weeks of combat, calling in
air strikes against Taliban positions, carrying out foot patrols
and firing a heavy-duty machine gun at suspected fighters.
 

It is the first time a British royal has been deployed in
combat since the Falklands war 25 years ago, when Harry's uncle
Prince Andrew flew helicopters.
 

After his presence became known, there were heightened
concerns he could become a target of the Taliban, al Qaeda or
other Islamist militants operating in Afghanistan, endangering
the prince as well as fellow soldiers.
 

Afghan Foreign Minister Rangeen Dadfar Spanta hailed Harry's
involvement, calling it "a sign of solidarity for Afghans in
their anti-terror fight ... it shows that the prince is ready to
combat this serious challenge."
 


 

MEDIA DEAL
 

When it was announced last year that he could be deployed to
Iraq, militant groups threatened to kidnap or kill him. The
deployment was later cancelled. When it came to Afghanistan, the
military tried a different approach.
 

The fact the embargo on the deployment held for 2-1/2 months
was a surprise, particularly given the cut-throat, free-for-all
nature of the British tabloid press. But it has also led to a
debate about the media and "backroom deals".
 

Jon Snow, a British news reader, said the embargo could be
damaging for the media's credibility.
 

"One wonders whether viewers, readers and listeners will
ever want to trust media bosses again," he wrote on his blog.
 

Reuters, like other news outlets, agreed to the embargo,
seeing it as similar to those often arranged with banks and
governments to release sensitive information at a specific time.
 

The only British national newspaper that did not put the
Harry story on its front page on Friday was the Independent.
 

"The most interesting aspect about all this is the breaking
of the media embargo by Drudge, but we decided that in itself
wasn't big enough to warrant the front page," deputy
editor-in-chief Ian Birrell told Reuters.
 

As far as the embargo goes, though, Birrell was supportive.
 

"I don't see a problem at all. I think the media has acted
in a very responsible manner on what has been a difficult
situation in which lives were at risk," he said.

Date created : 2008-03-01

Comments

COMMENT(S)