17 July 2008 - 12H22
- cycling - doping - Tour de France

FRANCE 24 viewers disappointed with doping scandals
After Riccardo Ricco and his team left the Tour de France in the midst of a fresh doping scandal, many reactions from the public reached our Internet desk. Some were confident that cycling could still do away with doping - others doubted it.

Italy’s Riccardo Ricco, winner of two stages in this year’s Tour de France, was the first rider to test positive for the banned blood booster EPO. His demise cast a further shadow on the venerable French race and condemned team Saunier Duval to an early exit. Read more.

 

FRANCE 24’s viewers have sent in many reactions to express their disappointment or satisfaction with the fight against doping in sporting events like Tour de France.

For many viewers, the fight against doping must go on.

Gnanan from Cote d’Ivoire strongly supports the crackdown on athletes taking drugs and feels a prestigious sporting event like Tour de France can be free of doping scandals.

Many people also wrote in saying participants should undergo systematic tests to make sure they are not taking drugs to enhance their performance. However, Christine Moloney from London pointed out that it would be a logistical nightmare to test every rider in a tournament like Tour de France.

For Moloney,  "testing the first three riders over the finish line at each stage could be a viable option. Look at it from a rider's point of view; if you had taken dubious substances, and you knew that if you finished in the top three you would be immediately tested as a result, you might think twice (or do an awful lot of hanging back which would look very suspicious). Doping has become prevalent in most sports now, and the powers that be must come up with a reasonably cheap and effective way of eradicating it; or at least make it as difficult as possible for the cheats to continue.”

“Too much money at stake”

French viewers like Morin feel there is too much money at stake, which pushes sportsmen to the extent of taking drugs. “It’s sad to see participants resort to drugs, maybe the amount of money at stake should be reduced,” Morin writes.

For another French viewer, “Doping has always existed but with growing competition and high stakes, players no longer hesitate to break the rules. There is no more respect and honour in the sporting event (Tour de France)”

“Good, but not enough”

According to a viewer from Abidjan in Cote d’Ivoire, “steps taken against riders like Riccardo Ricco are good but more needs to be done.” He suggests penalizing doctors who are often involved in such cases and who often test the participants before every stage in the cycling event.

For Sylvain from France, Tour de France is less of a sporting event and more of a chemistry competition. “The team with the latest and the most innovative drugs passes the tests successfully and has more chances of winning.

Alec from Manchester wonders if  “Tour de France can really be won without cheating?”

 

Comments (3)

Can they do it without

Not a strong follower of the tour but when I see what they do, really, is it possible without cheating???

drugs in sport

Re.the Olympics,if athletes decide to take drugs to enhance their performances in their desperate quest for medals,let them.That would be one sure way to diminish their achievements in everyone's eyes,including their own, as well as devaluing the Olympics,thereby ensuring the disappearance of sponsors.Cheating must be seen as the lowst of the low ways to attain success.Long term the athletes who indulge in drug taking will suffer physically for short term gains.
An alternative Olympics should be established for drug-free athletes.Thus we would have two Olympic Games,one for the druggies and one for the drug-free.It would be up to the sponsors of the drug-free Olympics to develop the technology to ensure that their athletes were genuinely clean..The drug-infested Olympics could then be treated as a freak sideshow.

Tour De France doping scandal

Testing every rider would be a logistical nightmare and extremely expensive, but testing the first 3 riders over the finish line at each stage could be a viable option. Look at it from a riders point of view; if you had taken dubious substances, and you knew that if you finished in the top 3 you would be immediately tested as a result, you might think twice (or do an awful lot of hanging back which would look very suspicious).
Doping has become prevalent in most sports now, and the powers that be must come up with a reasonably cheap and effective way of eradicating it; or at least make it as difficult as possible for the cheats to continue.

Related Content

Close