Read Armen Georgian's commentary ahead of Sarkozy's visit to Damascus.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy is heading for Damascus on Sept. 3 for a two-day visit, the first since President Jacques Chirac’s trip in 2002. The French leader aims to engage in “useful dialogue” with his Syrian counterpart Bashar al-Assad.
The meeting comes in the wake of warming relations between France and Syria, which hit a high when the Syrian president visited Paris in July for the Mediterranean Summit.
Syria’s stance on Lebanon paramount to enhanced relations
French Foreign Affairs Minister Bernard Kouchner visited Damascus on Aug. 25 to prepare for Sarkozy’s state visit, declaring that “future ties between the two countries depended on relations between Syria and Lebanon.” So far so good. France hailed Syria’s goodwill during the election of a Lebanese president, on the 25th May, and during the re-establishment of bilateral relations between Syria and Lebanon.
The French President also approved Syria’s decision to ask France to assist, when the time comes, direct talks between Israel and Syria. According to Bassam Tahan, a Syrian professor in Paris, “Nicolas Sarkozy’s visit shows that he is more Gaullist than his predecessor and adopts a more traditional policy towards the Arab world. Influenced by his personal feelings following [former Lebanese] Prime Minister Rafik Hariri’s killing, Jacques Chirac erred when he turned his back on Damascus - an unavoidable actor in the Middle East. At least, that’s what Sarkozy thinks.”
“France has nothing to gain from Syria”
Since then, however, someone threw a spanner into the works. During a recent visit to Moscow, the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad backed Russia’s military operation in Georgia, going as far as comparing the Caucasus to Lebanon and Syria. His stance “surprised” Kouchner.
According to geopolitics professor Frédéric Encel, Syria’s stance towards Russia “makes Sarkozy’s work more difficult especially vis-à-vis his Western allies, who are sceptical of his overtures to Syria. France gave everything to Bashar al-Assad when it invited him to stand among world leaders. However, France has nothing to gain from Syria, which needs Russian missiles, except small concessions in Lebanon.”
Anxiety in Beirut
Improved French-Syrian ties worry the parliamentary majority in Lebanon despite reassuring words from French foreign minister Bernard Kouchner in Beirut. “Warmer Franco-Syrian relations should not worry Lebanon,” explained Joseph Bahout, a Lebanese politics specialist. “Since the Doha agreements and Michel Sleiman’s election [to the Lebanese presidency], improved relations have only helped Lebanon. Syria’s change of style was noticeable during the visit of the Lebanese president in Damascus.”
04/09/2008 18:13:09 Alert a moderator
Syria & Israel
By Steve a - Manchester UK
There will have to be direct talks for any peace agreement but the postponement of the next indirect talks are NOT due to Israeli elections .There will soon be a new Prime Minister probably Mrs Livni .If she forms a government ,there will not be an election for at least 18 months !!
04/09/2008 11:08:55 Alert a moderator
What is required for peace
By Zbiq - Poland
The visit of the French visit in damascus is very important, but i don't think that UE cen help in peace between Israel and other islamic countries. If their leaders dont want peace, and as long as hamas and other terriris organisations won't be stopped, the peace in that region won't get real.
And we must remember that Syria is depend from Iran. And Iran don't want to agree with Israel...
03/09/2008 20:47:54 Alert a moderator
Joining the International Fold of Arch Criminals with the U.S.
By K.V. Tellis - Canada
Why should Syrian President Bashar al-Assad give a damn about the International Fold, of which an arch criminal the U.S. is also a member? Just where is Sarkozy leading Syria? It might be that Nicolas Sarkozy want's to cosy up to the U.S. and Israel, but that is France's choice, not Syria's.
The world does not need an organization that is very similar to the Mafia, so why encourage it? Let the International Conspiracy which led by the Bush regime wallow in its criminal activities and continue to exploi the world. When the time comes to pay the piper, let the U.S. pay the full price of its illegal actions worldwide.