PARIS, Sept 11 (Reuters) - France has arrested 55 militant
Islamists this year and the country's prisons have become a
favourite recruiting ground for such groups, Interior Minister
Michele Alliot-Marie said in an interview published on Thursday.
While some Islamists are still travelling to Iraq, Pakistani
and Afghan networks have strengthened, and "training and
indoctrination sites" are now concentrated in that area,
Alliot-Marie said in an interview with French daily Le Figaro.
"I can reveal that 89 Islamist activists were arrested in
France in 2007, and that 55 others have been arrested on our
soil since the start of the year," she said.
Prisons and some poor suburban neighbourhoods, many of which
house large numbers of families of African and North African
origin, were among recruiting networks' favoured targets.
"French prisons are a favoured recruiting ground for radical
Islamists. That is one of my concerns," Alliot-Marie said.
"I have just suggested to my European colleagues that we
create a manual on Islamism in prisons, to better inform
security professionals on how to detect and prevent this kind of
recruitment."
The organisation of al Qaeda has evolved from a centralised
structure to a loose web of cells, and the nature of their
attacks has also changed, the interior minister said.
"The terrorists have changed tactics. Several leaders of
Gulf countries have told me that attacks organised long in
advance are giving way to unplanned attacks of opportunity
committed by individuals indoctrinated via the Internet,"
Alliot-Marie said.
"Sometimes they are not even part of a network. This new
danger is therefore much harder to detect and follow."
She also called for wider screening of air passengers.
Currently, on flights from five countries including Pakistan
and Yemen, the names and travel details of passengers who have
been flagged as "dangerous" are sent to the French authorities
in agreement with airlines, Alliot-Marie said.
"We want to extend this measure to other countries and to
flights with a stopover, which would prevent for example
travelling via Switzerland when coming from Pakistan to cover
your tracks." She said she also wanted to include information on
whether passengers were accompanied.



















Comments (3)
WORDY NONSENSE
Every ideology is good for those with a sense of being rejected and prompted to fight 'panopticon'
this is junk philosophy,I guess you think passification is a good ideology for those who feel rejected and prompted to fight? lol
There is not much difference between religious and secular motivation except for the catchy and well grounded word 'Jihad'. It's all based on collective coercion no matter the kind of opium (the term understood as in Raymond Aron's book) used. It's more and more obscure nowadays when ideology is mixed with different freedom of movement and life chances for different individuals.
none of that makes ANY sense,you're trying to sound intellectual,but what you're really sounding like is a boob who likes the sound of their own comment lol
Of course they were always different. Let's say 'empowerment' conception may not be equally efficient or easy everywhere and for everyone
bla bla bla bla,etc,etc nobody cares dude,ppl's lives are at stake and you're just poking holes in the air
However on no condition should we litterally consider human a well bred wolf of a certain breed ready to prey"
You've obviously never met the U.S Spec ops lol
Conceptual differences (as in Levi Strauss's theory) are just conceptual regardless of their use and utility
more junk philosophy,the theory of relationships means everything means nothing,its about as usefull as tits on a boar hog
Let the inteligence do their job against certain people
You're in the minority believing in them both to be intelligent and capable of dong their job,which no body knows for sure WHAT their job is in the first place
there is no need for spectacular announcements
yeah,we should all go quietly into the night like good sheeple
Dubious panoptic joy
Every ideology is good for those with a sense of being rejected and prompted to fight 'panopticon' always well defined by certain leaders using particular categories. There is not much difference between religious and secular motivation except for the catchy and well grounded word 'Jihad'. It's all based on collective coercion no matter the kind of opium (the term understood as in Raymond Aron's book) used. It's more and more obscure nowadays when ideology is mixed with different freedom of movement and life chances for different individuals. Of course they were always different. Let's say 'empowerment' conception may not be equally efficient or easy everywhere and for everyone. However on no condition should we litterally consider human a well bred wolf of a certain breed ready to prey. Conceptual differences (as in Levi Strauss's theory) are just conceptual regardless of their use and utility, be it in real-old-established world or Zimbardo's experiment. Let the inteligence do their job against certain people, there is no need for spectacular announcements. It is not a pleasure to be panoptic and everybody knows it even the most secure guards.
THE FUTURE
what do you expect when youve made your own ppl second class citizens in their own country,giving foreigners who set fire to everything when they get upset more clout than the French whose home it REALLY is?
I mean,how smart is it to group them together in slums so they can all feel like victims and plot against you and your own culture,youve given your country away to wolves who want to eat you
VERY DUMB !