Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

EYE ON AFRICA

Togo : will president Faure Gnassingbe win a third 5-year term ?

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Controversy reigns 100 years after the Armenian genocide

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

Migrant Deaths: Politicians Divided after Emergency EU Summit

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

The G-Word: Turkey and the Armenian Genocide

Read more

FRANCE IN FOCUS

What will the new French healthcare bill change?

Read more

#TECH 24

Space Special: Happy Birthday, Hubble!

Read more

FOCUS

Video: Meeting Marseille's Armenian community

Read more

REPORTERS

Saving French soldiers' WWI trench carvings

Read more

ENCORE!

Armenia, 100 years on

Read more

Davydenko cleared in corruption probe

Latest update : 2008-09-12

The ATP investigation over alleged corruption involving the Russian tennis player Nikolay Davydenko has concluded having found "no evidence" against him. The case, opened in 2007, looked into online betting.

Russian tennis pro Nikolay Davydenko has been cleared by the ATP of suspicion of corruption.

Davydenko's forfeit of a match against Argentina's Martin Vassallo-Arguello at Sopot in Poland in 2007 sparked a huge controversy after it was revealed that large sums of money were being bet on the match.

On Friday the ATP (Association of Tennis Professionals) which runs the men's game said an investigation showed that both Davydenko and Vassallo-Arguello were innocent of any wrongdoing.

"The ATP has now exhausted all avenues of enquiry and the investigation is now concluded," said a statement.

"A fundamental role of the ATP is to ensure that men's professional tennis continues to be free of corruption.

"For this reason, the ATP instigated an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the match in Sopot.

"ATP can confirm that it has concluded its investigation and found no evidence of a violation of its rules by either Mr Arguello or Mr Davydenko or anyone else associated with the match."

A major internet site suspended all bets after Davydenko'a forfeit, while his Argentine opponent was leading 2-6, 6-3, 2-1, because the sums of money being placed were suspiciously large.

Date created : 2008-09-12

COMMENT(S)