- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 17/09/2008
- Georgia - Russia - South Ossetia
Tbilisi objects to Russian pacts with breakaway regions
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (photo) signed cooperation pacts establishing economic and military ties with breakaway Georgian regions South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Georgian officials said the move was a "de facto annexing" of the territories.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Wednesday signed agreements formalising military and economic ties with two rebel regions in Georgia despite anger from Tbilisi and its Western allies.
"We will give each other all necessary support, including military support," Medvedev said after a pomp-filled Kremlin signing ceremony, flanked by the separatist leaders of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
"We will not allow a new military adventure. No one should have any illusions about this," he said, referring to a Georgian attack on South Ossetia last month that prompted Russia to launch a massive retaliatory strike.
The agreements allow Russia to open military bases in the two rebel provinces and commit Russia to defend the regions from attack, as well as promising to unite energy, transport and telecommunications networks.
The pacts also say that Russian troops will help defend the borders separating Abkhazia and South Ossetia from the rest of Georgia jointly with separatist authorities for the sake of "peace and stability" in the region.
Only Russia and Nicaragua have recognised the two regions as independent.
Abkhaz leader Sergei Bagapsh and South Ossetian leader Eduard Kokoity thanked Russia in short speeches after the signing. The three leaders then drank champagne to toast the newly signed pacts.
The agreements, which follow a symbolic exchange of diplomatic notes last week, are designed to set up the basic framework for relations between Russia and the two regions that it recognises as independent states.
Russia and Georgia fought a five-day war in August when Russian troops poured into South Ossetia to repel an attack by Tbilisi's forces.
Russia routed the Georgian troops and shortly afterwards announced formal recognition of the two rebel provinces and plans to open embassies there.
Last week, senior Russian officials promised to locate military bases containing 3,800 troops in each of the two regions, even as the Kremlin agreed to withdraw its forces from the rest of Georgia.
Georgia has fiercely criticised the Russian deployment, saying it amounts to annexation of its sovereign territory, and the complaint has been echoed by Tbilisi's allies in the West who say Russia is redrawing the map of Georgia.
"The option of keeping Russian forces in South Ossetia and Abkhazia is not acceptable," NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said in an interview published Monday in London's Financial Times newspaper.
Medvedev has said a Russian military presence in both provinces is needed to prevent renewed "aggression" by the Georgian army.
The crisis has brought relations between Russia and the West to their lowest ebb since the Cold War.
Moscow has also been angered by Georgia's attempts to join the NATO military alliance, which has expressed support for Tbilisi but stopped short of providing direct military aid.
On Wednesday, the Russian foreign ministry described a visit earlier this week to Georgia by a top-level NATO delegation as "anti-Russian" and said it confirmed Cold War reflexes were "still at work" within the Atlantic alliance.
De Hoop Scheffer visited Georgia with envoys of all 26 NATO member states to show support and to inaugurate a new Georgia-NATO cooperation commission. He said Tuesday that the path to NATO admission was "still wide open" for Georgia.
Abkhazia and South Ossetia have called on the international community to recognise their fledgling independence, but only former Soviet ally Nicaragua has so far heeded the call.


























Comments (3)
Shakashvili was dealt a poor hand and he played even poorly
Look, no offense to anyone, but who really cares about Georgia's fate, let alone its history?! We're dealing here with a little David guy (Shakashvili) who went against Goliath and got beated to a pulp... Just why did David lose it so bad? It is conceivable that this poor chap was set up by his Washington masters in a big- league match against the Russians. Somehow this Shakashvili (what a tragic napoleonic face) was lead to believe the West will come to his help... Ha, ha... Hasn't he read anything about the '56 Hungary, '68 Prague, '79 Solidarnosc? Well, ok, little David Shakashvili, you lost your shirt and a quart of Georgia. May you kiss them both good buy!! The West will steam off through their nostrils for a few weeks and then the whole stage will move somewhere else and you will be another forgotten quichotic sad guy in the history of your little patetic country (anyone remembers Gamsakurdia?) And if you can't fade quietely into the sunset, Putin will squeeze your nose again, only this time you'll have to move forever oversees. You know, there is another Georgia for you, waiting.
Don't judge without knowladge
Tbilisi's objections are justified beacuse since long ago, historically, these territories have always belonged to Georgia. I should like the people who will also express their reaction to this artical could obtain real information about Georgia's history before expressing their opinions and concepts.
Independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia not annexation
The Reublics of Abkhazia and South Ossetia have not been annexed by Russia. They are therefore independent states and should recognized as such by the world.
Abkhazia and South Ossetia were forcibly incorporated into Georgia by the Soviets in 1931, and thus were never part of Georgia proper. The lies being put out by the Saakashvili government of Georgia are just fairy tales written for them by Hollywood.