Open

Coming up

Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

DEBATE

Pakistan Protests: Democracy put the test (Part One)

Read more

ENCORE!

The French Maestro of Soul

Read more

FOCUS

US tobacco giants want lion's share of e-cigarette business

Read more

ENCORE!

Bold and bonkers: Kate Bush is back on stage

Read more

THE INTERVIEW

Simon Serfaty, US foreign policy specialist

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

'It's a War, Stupid!'

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

French PM calls on ECB to go further to help economy

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

'I love the Socialists'

Read more

WEB NEWS

Ukraine: Web users call for international assistance

Read more

  • Ukrainian forces retreat from Luhansk airport after clashes

    Read more

  • Teddy Riner, France’s unstoppable judo champion

    Read more

  • French education ministry picture sparks racist abuse

    Read more

  • French police arrest hungry hedgehog hunters

    Read more

  • US urges Israel to reverse West Bank land seizure

    Read more

  • UN backs inquiry of IS group’s alleged crimes in Iraq

    Read more

  • Tripoli under control of militias, says government

    Read more

  • Iraqi forces free Amerli in biggest victory over IS militants since June

    Read more

  • Monaco’s Falcao set for Man Utd loan on transfer deadline day

    Read more

  • Spain orders custody for parents of ill British boy

    Read more

  • Anti-government protesters storm Pakistan's state TV

    Read more

  • Putin calls for talks on 'statehood' for east Ukraine

    Read more

  • Poland marks 75 years since German invasion of WWII

    Read more

  • Israel appropriates large tracts of West Bank land

    Read more

  • Rescue efforts under way after French apartment block blast

    Read more

  • Web doc on French self-immolation protests takes top prize

    Read more

Iraq says will not be bullied into signing US security pact

Latest update : 2008-10-22

Iraq's Foreign minister said that the US has agreed to hear proposed changes to a security pact between the nations. The pact has been delayed by Iraq's objection to the wording of the pact.


   
Iraq warned on Wednesday it would not be bullied into signing a security pact with the United States despite US leaders warning of potentially dire consequences if it failed to approve the deal.
   
Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh lashed out at US military chief Admiral Michael Mullen for saying that Baghdad risked significant losses if an agreement is not concluded to keep American forces in the country beyond 2008.
   
"It is not correct to force Iraqis into making a choice and it is not appropriate to talk with the Iraqis in this way," Dabbagh said.
   
To the apparent frustration of the Americans, the Iraqi cabinet decided on Tuesday to seek changes in the pact after months of tough negotiations between Baghdad and Washington.
   
The draft deal calls for a withdrawal of US combat forces from Iraq by the end of 2011 and includes US concessions on jurisdiction over its troops accused of "serious crimes" while off duty or off base.
   
But the agreement has ignited fierce debate in Iraq, with radical anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr leading a wave of protests.
   
On Tuesday, Mullen said if Baghdad delayed signing the deal beyond the December 31 expiry of the current UN mandate governing the presence of foreign troops, its forces "will not be ready to provide for their security."
   
"And in that regard there is great potential for losses of significant consequence."
   
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates echoed Mullen, saying: "The consequences of not having a SOFA (Status of Forces Agreement) and of not having a renewed UN authorisation are pretty dramatic in terms of consequences for our actions."
   
And on Wednesday, the White House again insisted there was limited scope for any changes in the deal.
   
Spokeswoman Dana Perino said "the door wasn't slammed shut but it's pretty much closed in our opinion." Negotiators would have "a very high bar for them to clear" if there were to be any changes at this stage, she added.
   
In a strongly worded statement, Dabbagh said the government was "deeply concerned" by Mullen's remarks.
   
"Such a statement is not welcomed by Iraq. All Iraqis and their political entities are aware of their responsibilities and are assessing whether to sign the deal or not in a way that it is suitable to them."
   
Iraqi military spokesman Brigadier General Qassim Atta also insisted that domestic forces were ready to handle security nationwide.
   
"The security forces are ready since their numbers have increased and following the improvement in their abilities," he told a news conference.
   
"They are already controlling 11 provinces and soon we will take over the rest of the provinces."
   
Senior Shiite lawmaker Abbas al-Bayati said such comments by Washington's leaders were provocative.
   
"Mullen's remark is an attempt to pressure the Iraqi side, but we will not be subjected to such tactics because our reservations are linked to the sovereignty and national interest of Iraq," he told AFP.
   
"The American side should be more flexible because if they really want to pass this agreement, they should first stop launching such warnings which provoke Iraqis."
   
At Tuesday's cabinet meeting, some ministers opposed a clause that allows Iraq to ask US forces to stay beyond 2011 if required for training local troops.
   
"What has been agreed in the pact has made some people feel this could lead to a long-term presence of American troops," Science and Technology Minister Raed Jahed Fahmi told AFP.
   
Fahmi said there were also concerns over the definition of what would constitute "serious crimes" committed by American personnel for which they can be prosecuted under Iraqi law.
   
"We have to be precise on what these crimes could be. For example, if the Americans kill someone by mistake, will it be included in this? Also inside the base can they do whatever they want with the Iraqis?"
   
According to the draft, crimes committed by American personnel inside their bases and while on duty will be under US jurisdiction.
   

Date created : 2008-10-22

COMMENT(S)