Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

EYE ON AFRICA

Togo : will president Faure Gnassingbe win a third 5-year term ?

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Controversy reigns 100 years after the Armenian genocide

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

Migrant Deaths: Politicians Divided after Emergency EU Summit

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

The G-Word: Turkey and the Armenian Genocide

Read more

FRANCE IN FOCUS

What will the new French healthcare bill change?

Read more

#TECH 24

Space Special: Happy Birthday, Hubble!

Read more

FOCUS

Video: Meeting Marseille's Armenian community

Read more

REPORTERS

Saving French soldiers' WWI trench carvings

Read more

ENCORE!

Armenia, 100 years on

Read more

Alaska panel clears Palin in 'Troopergate' scandal

Text by REUTERS

Latest update : 2008-11-04

On the eve of the U.S. presidential elections, the Alaska Personnel Board said Sarah Palin did not abuse her powers as governor when she fired a state commissioner, contrary to to the conclusions of a previous legislative inquiry.

 

Alaska Governor and Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin was cleared on Monday of wrongdoing in an abuse-of-power investigation into the firing of the state’s public safety commissioner.

The Alaska Personnel Board report, issued on the eve of the U.S. presidential election, ran contrary to findings from a legislative inquiry that concluded in October that Palin had abused the power of her office by pressuring subordinates to fire a state trooper involved in a feud with her family.

Palin, who is Republican presidential candidate John McCain’s running mate, brought the issue to the personnel board herself after complaining the legislative probe was a partisan effort led by Democrats.

The board, a three-member panel under Palin’s authority, was responsible for determining if she had broken any laws.

The investigation concluded there was no “probable cause” that Palin violated the state’s executive ethics act in dismissing Walt Monegan as public safety commissioner.

It also cleared her of ethics violations in respect to her dealings regarding Michael Wooten, the trooper involved in a contentious divorce and custody battle with the governor’s sister.

Timothy Petumenos, independent counsel for the Alaska Personnel Board who wrote the report, said the legislative probe did a good job of assembling facts but did not interpret the ethics law properly.

“The Ethics Act is primarily directed at personal financial benefit,” Petumenos told a news conference presenting the report. “People have a lot of misconceptions about the scope of the Alaska Ethics Act.”

Petumenos also said the governor and several other administration officials categorically denied some of the conversations and contacts about which Monegan testified. That testimony became much of the basis for the legislative report’s conclusion that she pressured subordinates to fire Wooten.

Palin also testified, according to Petumenos, that she had no knowledge of many of the contacts that formed the basis of the legislative probe, and that administrative officials made those contracts without her permission or direction.

PALIN PLEASED BY FINDINGS

Thomas Van Flein, attorney for Palin and her husband, Todd Palin, said the Palins were pleased by the personnel board’s findings.

“Mr. Petumenos determined that the Branchflower report’s findings that Governor Palin abused her power had no legal basis and that Governor Palin did not violate the Ethics Act as Mr. Branchflower incorrectly asserted,” Van Flein said in a statement.

The governor, her husband and several aides had resisted calls to provide testimony to the legislative inquiry. Todd Palin and the aides refused to honor subpoenas issued in September by the state Senate Judiciary Committee.

Ultimately, Todd Palin and administrative officials submitted written statements to Steve Branchflower, the retired state prosecutor who wrote the legislative report.

The report said it was “concerned” about the use of private e-mail addresses for government work by Palin and her staff since e-mails using those addresses could not be archived and used for evidence in the investigation after deletion.

Date created : 2008-11-04

COMMENT(S)