Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

THE DEBATE

Europe’s Blame Game: finger pointing continues as Calais migrant crisis worsens (part 2)

Read more

THE DEBATE

Europe’s Blame Game: finger pointing continues as Calais migrant crisis worsens (part 1)

Read more

PEOPLE & PROFIT

Gold prices: no longer a safe haven?

Read more

FOCUS

Secular bloggers live in fear after spate of killings

Read more

ENCORE!

The art of resistance, from Gaza to Lebanon via Timbuktu

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

'Close down Calais until the French get a grip'

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Europe's new 'Iron Curtain'

Read more

INSIDE THE AMERICAS

US gun laws criticised after fresh shootings

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Half of global internet users are on Facebook

Read more

Top US Court to rule on imprisonment of terror suspects

Latest update : 2008-12-06

The US Supreme Court has said it would rule on whether President George W. Bush can order the indefinite imprisonment of terror suspects without charging them.

REUTERS - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Friday
that it would decide whether President George W. Bush
can order the indefinite imprisonment in the United States of
an al Qaeda suspect without charging him.
 

In the latest test of Bush's war-on-terrorism policies, the
nation's highest court agreed to hear an appeal by a Qatari
national, Ali al-Marri, the only foreign national currently
being held in the United States as an "enemy combatant."
 

While President-elect Barack Obama has strongly opposed
Bush's policies and has vowed to close the U.S. military prison
at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, he and his aides have not said what
position his administration will take in Marri's case.
 

After Bush designated Marri an "enemy combatant" in June of
2003, he has been held in solitary confinement in a U.S. Navy
brig in Charleston, South Carolina without being charged.
 

Marri's attorneys appealed a U.S. appeals court's ruling in
July that the U.S. Congress gave Bush the power to detain Marri
as part of its authorization for use of military force after
the Sept. 11 attacks by al Qaeda in 2001.
 

They said the law authorizing military force and the U.S.
Constitution do not allow for the indefinite military detention
of a person lawfully residing in the United States, without
criminal charges or a trial.
 

"Under the Constitution, people cannot be locked up
indefinitely just because the president says so," said Jonathan
Hafetz, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union who
represents Marri.
 

The Supreme Court in June rebuked Bush in a landmark ruling
that prisoners held at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo can
go before federal judges in Washington to seek their release.
There are now about 250 prisoners at Guantanamo.
 

It also ruled against the Bush administration in three
other war-on-terrorism cases in 2006 and 2004.
 

The Supreme Court most likely will hear arguments in
Marri's case in March, with a decision expected by the end of
June.

Date created : 2008-12-06

COMMENT(S)