Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

EYE ON AFRICA

Hundreds of Malawians arrive in Blantyre after wave of xenophobic attacks in South Africa

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Reactions to the "bookkeeper of Auschwitz" trial

Read more

DEBATE

Judging the Past: Auschwitz 'bookkeeper' goes on trial in Germany (part 2)

Read more

DEBATE

Judging the Past: Auschwitz 'bookkeeper' goes on trial in Germany (part 1)

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

Al-Shabaab bomb kills 4 unicef workers in Somalia

Read more

ENCORE!

Caitlin Doughty invites us to 'Ask a Mortician'

Read more

FOCUS

Serge and Beate Klarsfeld publish memoirs of Nazi-hunting years

Read more

THE BUSINESS INTERVIEW

'Liberalism is a French tradition', says France's most liberal man

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

Xenophobic attacks in South Africa prompt regional crisis

Read more

Top US Court to rule on imprisonment of terror suspects

Latest update : 2008-12-06

The US Supreme Court has said it would rule on whether President George W. Bush can order the indefinite imprisonment of terror suspects without charging them.

REUTERS - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Friday
that it would decide whether President George W. Bush
can order the indefinite imprisonment in the United States of
an al Qaeda suspect without charging him.
 

In the latest test of Bush's war-on-terrorism policies, the
nation's highest court agreed to hear an appeal by a Qatari
national, Ali al-Marri, the only foreign national currently
being held in the United States as an "enemy combatant."
 

While President-elect Barack Obama has strongly opposed
Bush's policies and has vowed to close the U.S. military prison
at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, he and his aides have not said what
position his administration will take in Marri's case.
 

After Bush designated Marri an "enemy combatant" in June of
2003, he has been held in solitary confinement in a U.S. Navy
brig in Charleston, South Carolina without being charged.
 

Marri's attorneys appealed a U.S. appeals court's ruling in
July that the U.S. Congress gave Bush the power to detain Marri
as part of its authorization for use of military force after
the Sept. 11 attacks by al Qaeda in 2001.
 

They said the law authorizing military force and the U.S.
Constitution do not allow for the indefinite military detention
of a person lawfully residing in the United States, without
criminal charges or a trial.
 

"Under the Constitution, people cannot be locked up
indefinitely just because the president says so," said Jonathan
Hafetz, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union who
represents Marri.
 

The Supreme Court in June rebuked Bush in a landmark ruling
that prisoners held at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo can
go before federal judges in Washington to seek their release.
There are now about 250 prisoners at Guantanamo.
 

It also ruled against the Bush administration in three
other war-on-terrorism cases in 2006 and 2004.
 

The Supreme Court most likely will hear arguments in
Marri's case in March, with a decision expected by the end of
June.

Date created : 2008-12-06

COMMENT(S)