EU - Gaza Strip - Israeli-Palestinian conflict - Russia - UN - US politics
Israel’s Barak looking at Gaza 48-hour truce plan ‘favourably’
Tuesday 30 December 2008
Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak is "considering favourably" a proposal to institute a 48-hour truce in the Gaza Strip, his spokesman said. In New York, the Mideast Quartet called for an immediate ceasefire of hostilities.
Tuesday 30 December 2008
By Clea CAULCUTT (text)Israel's Defence Minister Ehud Barak is "considering favourably" a French proposal for a 48-hour truce in and around the Gaza Strip, “for humanitarian purposes”, his spokesman said late on Tuesday.
"This doesn't stop us in any way from preparing for a ground offensive," he added.
He made the comments as Barak was meeting with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to discuss the proposed temporary truce.
However, Israeli Infrastructure Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer warned earlier that a ceasefire would allow Hamas “to regain strength, recover from the shock and prepare an even stronger attack against Israel.”
“There is no reason that we would accept a ceasefire at this stage,” he said. Meanwhile, Hamas warned that it was prepared to send rockets deeper into Israel if its military continued to pummel Gaza.
Calls for an immediate ceasefire
The Middle East Quartet, including the EU, Russia, the US, and the UN, called on Tuesday for an “immediate ceasefire” in the Gaza Strip “that would be fully respected”, following a meeting in New York.
The call was backed by EU foreign ministers gathered in Paris, four days after the beginning of the hostilities. "The European Union is more determined than ever to assist alongside the other members of the Quartet and the region's states in ending violence and re-launching the peace process," the Union said in a statement.
While experts question the EU’s ability to stop Israeli raids, Belgian Socialist MEP Véronique de Keyser told FRANCE 24 that the EU might grasp this opportunity to renew talks with Hamas which broke down in 2006. According to de Keyser, the EU missed a great opportunity to include the Islamic movement in negotiations when Palestinian parties agreed to a national unity government in spring 2007, a move "which implied that Hamas recognized Israel along the 1967 borders.”
Deafening US silence
As the White House refused to call for a stop of Israeli air strikes on Gaza, neither US President George W. Bush nor President-elect Barack Obama commented publicly on the assault.
On Tuesday, Bush urged Palestinian leaders to boost efforts to end the violence in the Gaza Strip by working towards a truce respected by Hamas militants.
Obama, on vacation in Hawaii, has not commented on the Gaza violence and will add increased Middle East tensions to a list of foreign policy problems his administration will face when it comes into office Jan. 20.
"If Obama continues to remain silent ... his silence will be seen and will have the operational effect of providing an endorsement for Israel's war on Gaza," said Paul Woodward of Conflicts Forum, an organisation aimed at changing Western policy towards Islamist movements such as Hamas.
According to Hall Gardner, professor of international relations at the American University of Paris, Obama cannot skirt the Israeli-Arab conflict for much longer. He says Obama will have to “address the moderate in the Arab-Islamic world and to show them that the US wants peace and wants to end the Arab-Israeli conflict as a symbolic step towards ending the war on terrorism.”
Pour aller plus loin
Pour aller plus loin



30/12/2008 23:30:23 Alert a moderator
More isreali SHAME
By HABA -
I am shocked!!! , What kind of cease fire is this?!, the only reason for israeli to accept cease fire is to have ease and time to build up more troops on ground in order to escalate the attacks and kill more Palestinian civilian innocents, not for humanitarian purposes and not to help or favor the Palestinians who fall dead till to this moment under the israeli senseless aggressive Attacks (300 heavy air Raids using most sophisticated weapons).
My question is why the Quartet, did not meet to stop the israeli Siege on Gaza a month ago? when the UNRWA announced that they run out of food and since then Gaza citizen are under hunger.
30/12/2008 23:01:36 Alert a moderator
Before I forget: the peace envoy
By Outsider -
Didn't the Quartet nominate a peace envoy at some stage? Where has he been for the past few months? What does he actually do?
30/12/2008 22:59:11 Alert a moderator
About time
By Outsider -
But the Quartet are part of the problem. They have refused to talk to Hamas since 2005. So this is partly their fault. It was obvious that excluding the leading political party in Palestine from any sort of negotiations was the wrong approach, and things have only gotten worse since then. None of the goals - a less radical Hamas, the return of Gilad Shalit, economic development - have been achieved. And now the situation has been further radicalised. What Palestinian can trust Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah when Israel has been playing them and the US for fools since Annapolis? Extraordinarily short-sighted approach from people that should know better.
30/12/2008 22:14:44 Alert a moderator
Mideast 'Quartet' calls for immediate ceasefire
By David -
Why didn't the Quartet meet a week ago to call on the Hamas to cease fire before Israel began to defend herself? Why doesn't the Quartet want the Hamas terrorist organization eliminated?