Open

Coming up

Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

FOCUS

Indian uranium mines take heavy toll on people and environment

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Provocative sculpture 'unplugged'

Read more

ENCORE!

Encore's Film Show: Brad Pitt's 'Fury' and Woody Allen's Magic

Read more

FACE-OFF

François Hollande: The mid-term blues

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

French papers pay tribute to Christophe de Margerie

Read more

MIDDLE EAST MATTERS

Anti-IS group fighters: When foreigners join the fight against jihadists

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Pistorius and the lone walk to prison

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Armed clowns terrify the north of France

Read more

AFRICA NEWS

Central African Republic: Stability still a struggle ahead of 2015 elections

Read more

Europe

Top court set to rule on CIA kidnap case

Latest update : 2009-03-10

The trial of 26 Americans and seven Italian spies, accused of kidnapping and illegally detaining a terror suspect, resumes in a top Italian court. The Italian state wants the court to annul the case, saying it breaks state secrecy laws.

REUTERS - The Italian state will ask the Constitutional Court on Tuesday to throw out a trial of U.S. and Italian spies accused of kidnapping a terrorism suspect, arguing the case breaks state secrecy laws, lawyers in the case said.
 

Twenty-six Americans and seven Italians are accused of grabbing a Muslim imam off the streets of Milan and flying him
to Egypt in 2003. Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, says he was tortured and held for years without charge.
 

Human rights groups accuse Washington and its allies of breaking international law with the extrajudicial transfers, known as "renditions".
 

Successive Italian governments, while denying any state role in Nasr's disappearance, have argued that prosecutors got to the trial phase by breaking rules governing national security.
 

This includes wiretapping spies and questioning them on classified matters, such as relations with the CIA.
 

After years of legal manoeuvres, the matter is finally before the Constitutional Court.
 

"If the government's position is upheld by the Constitutional Court, certain evidence will become impossible to use," Ignazio Francesco Caramazza, who will argue the state's position, told Reuters.
 

Caramazza said the state wants the court to annul the trial as a result, since the indictments were based at least partly on that evidence. Prosecutors must rebuild their case, he said.
 

Caramazza said the state did not oppose any future trial, as long as state secrecy rules were respected.
 

A lawyer who will represent prosecutors before the court said he would argue that the no state secrecy rules were broken during the kidnapping investigation.
 

But he acknowledged that a ruling in favour of the state could send prosecutors back to the phase of collecting evidence and seeking indictments.
 

"If that were the case, the decree ordering a trial would be annulled. One would have to start over again," Alessandro Pace, who will argue on behalf of prosecutors, told Reuters.
 

A verdict following the closed-door proceedings could come as early as Tuesday, but, given the complexity of the case, observers say a decision could take days.
 

Washington has defended renditions as a valid counter-terrorism tool that has produced vital intelligence and rejected accusations that it allowed torture.
 

The new CIA director under U.S. President Barack Obama has said rendition is still permitted, subject to assurances suspects would be treated humanely.
 

In the Milan case, Nasr says he was subjected to electric shock, beatings and rape threats. The Egyptian-born imam, who was released from Egyptian custody in 2007, faces an arrest warrant in Italy on suspicion of terrorist activity.

Date created : 2009-03-10

COMMENT(S)