Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

THE DEBATE

Next stop, Westminster: Supreme Court orders Brexit parliament vote (part 1)

Read more

THE DEBATE

Next stop, Westminster: Supreme Court orders Brexit parliament vote (part 2)

Read more

FOCUS

Iranian women push boundaries through sport

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Crowds, Lies & Alternative Facts

Read more

ENCORE!

Backstage at the Haute Couture show of designer Julien Fournié

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

President Trump pulls US out of TPP trade deal

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

'Donald Trump is rolling back the clock on diversity in the cabinet'

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Did France's left inflate turnout figures in round one of the primary?

Read more

ACROSS AFRICA

Dozens killed in attack on military camp in Mali

Read more

Europe

Uncertainty reigns ahead of ‘Durban II’ conference

Video by Nicolas GERMAIN

Text by Marie VALLA

Latest update : 2009-04-18

Eight years after a UN conference on racism in South Africa, a new conference in Geneva -- to take place from April 20 to 24 -- is having trouble before it begins. The US, certain European nations, and Israel have not confimed their participation.

Uncertainty persists before the second UN conference on racism and intolerance scheduled to take place in Geneva from April 20 to 24. The nations and organizations meant to take part have dallied in confirming their participation -- following the example set by the EU, which has yet to give definitive word.


The first conference on racism -- held in Durban, South Africa, in 2001 -- was a near-failure because of strong discord over Israel’s policy toward Palestinians.

The US and Israel left the summit in protest against an item on its agenda that sought to classify Zionism as a form of racism in the summit’s final declaration.

This year, the announcement that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would attend the conference seemed to put an ominous bias on how the debates on Middle East issues would unfold.

“The fight against racism and discrimination is too important to let it run its own course,” said Juliette de Rivero, Geneva advocacy director of the New York-based Human Rights Watch, in a press release.

NGOs divided

Three counter summits have been organized on the sidelines of the official meetings.

A civil society forum, whose organizers want to offer a completely independent programme, is to be held at the House of Geneva Associations. A street demonstration is also expected on Saturday afternoon.

Finally, a “Geneva summit for human rights, tolerance, and democracy” is slated to take place at the International Conference Centre. This summit’s stated goal is to address the question of human rights on a large scale (genocide, etc). Israeli associations have signed on to participate.

Sympathizers of the Palestinian cause will meet at the “Conference for examining the Israel question,” to take place at the Le Grenil hotel.

Human Rights Watch will not take part in any of the three side summits. Rather, the group will be present at the official proceedings of the main conference.

Racism as a ‘question of social and cultural rights’

An amended version of the Geneva summit’s final declaration should be available before the first session officially opens on Monday. The US -- along with certain European nations -- is waiting to read the final version before confirming its participation.

The declaration is expected to strip any political issues – such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – of overtones that might be construed as religious defamation.

Some humanitarian associations have deplored the fact that the conference’s ambitions have been whittled down to reduce discord.

Éric Sottas, secretary general of the World Organisation against Torture in Geneva, says: “We regret the slow advancement on the question of migrants motivated by socio-economic factors, who are victims of ethnic discrimination in their respective countries. We must absolutely integrate the question of racism with the question of social and cultural rights.”

 

 

 

Date created : 2009-04-17

COMMENT(S)