Latest update: 03/05/2009 

- Georgia - Russia - South Ossetia


Russia guarding border separatist zones
Russian soldiers have begun patrolling the de-facto borders of Georgia's rebel region of South Ossetia, ahead of scheduled NATO military exercises in the area that Moscow views as a challenge to the west.
Catherine NORRIS TRENT (video)

AFP - Russian guards have taken up positions on the borders of Georgia's breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in line with a pact the separatists sealed with Moscow, Interfax reported on Saturday.
   
"Subdivisions of Russia's border forces have already entered South Ossetia and gone to the border," the head of border forces for the southern federal region, Nikolai Lisinsky, said.
   
"The headquarters of the border forces is to be located right in Tskhinvali and the rest along the whole border," he said, referring to the South Ossetian capital at the centre of a brief war last year between Russia and Georgia.
   
In another separatist region, Abkhazia, the head of the separatists' armed forces, Anatoly Zaitsev, said Russian border guards had been met by local residents bearing flowers as they arrived to begin work.
   
"Subdivisions of Russia's border forces arrived in the Gali district immediately after the signing in Moscow of the agreement on joint protection of the Abkhaz border," said Zaitsev, referring to the pacts signed on Thursday between Moscow and the leaders of the two separatist regions.
   
Earlier the West condemned the signing of border defence treaties between Moscow and the leaders of the two regions.
   
Both the United States and the European Union said the pacts breached a ceasefire accord brokered by the EU last summer.
   
The signing comes amid a row over NATO's plans to hold military exercises this month in Georgia.
   
The alliance describes the exercises as a counter-terrorism drill not threatening any state, but Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has slammed them as a "provocation" likely to encourage a reckless Georgian leadership.
   
On Friday, Georgia's foreign ministry slammed the new border pacts, saying they "represent yet another Russian attempt to strengthen the military build-up on Georgia's occupied territories and legitimize the occupation process."
   
The signing "grossly violates the fundamental norms and principles of international law," the ministry said in a statement.
   
Prior to Thursday's pact, Russia had already based thousands of its soldiers in the two separatist regions. Moscow has also agreed on building a naval base on Abkhazia's Black Sea coast.
   
Under this week's border pacts, effective for 10 years, Russia assumes immediate responsibility for guarding the regions' de facto borders with Georgia, including maritime patrols of Abkhazia's strategic Black Sea coast.

Comments (4)

Invaded, sold ou, annexed for gas cont.

In Iraq people like Eric claimed the US was after oil, yet we see no oil stolen, contracted to US companies or anything, just an elected govt deciding what Iraqis want to with Iraqi oil

In Georgia the monopsony gas buyer status that Russia exploits in the Caspian (the only export route to Europe is via Russia) to its multi billion per annum benefit was about to be broken with pipeline export routes to Europe across Georgia. Guess what the "border guards" guns are pointing at. Yep, the now unlikely route for the pipeline. Caspian gas producers can thus continue supplying Russia for pitiful prices and thus Gazprom's continued failure to produce more gas can be covered up and the gas export to Europe cashflow that pays for the ruling elites will keep flowing.

Iraq, not invaded for resources. Georgia, invaded to control resources. France on the "wrong side" in each case.

Invaded, sold out, annexed, for gas cont..

cont..

In Iraq people like Eric claimed the US was after oil, yet we see no oil stolen, contracted to US companies or anything, just an elected govt deciding what Iraqis want to with Iraqi oil

In Georgia the monopsony gas buyer status that Russia exploits in the Caspian (the only export route to Europe is via Russia) to its multi billion per annum benefit was about to be broken with pipeline export routes to Europe across Georgia. Guess what the "border guards" guns are pointing at. Yep, the now unlikely route for the pipeline. Caspian gas producers can thus continue supplying Russia for pitiful prices and thus Gazprom's continued failure to produce more gas can be covered up and the gas export to Europe cashflow that pays for the ruling elites will keep flowing.

Iraq, not invaded for resources. Georgia, invaded to control resources. France on the "wrong side" in each case.

Invaded, sold out, annexed, for gas

Regardless of what "Georgian provocation" is alleged the facts are that Russia has invaded the democratic sovereign state of Georgia by force and now guards the borders with its army. Russia has annexed parts of Georgia. What justification is the "provocation" of your military's activities within your borders for that? How Eric "see's no difference" in this to Bush invading Iraq to remove a brutal dictator and, perhaps clumsily and making mistakes, created a democratic free sovereign state defies belief.

bias in the western media

when will people see sense? what's the problem, EU monitors have already said Georgia are provoking tension in the regions, why shouldn't Russia protect a peace agreement if it is threatened?Georgia have already broken an agreement before, there's every reason to believe they may do it again. Why is NATO and Obama provoking tensions by holding war games? maybe if they weren't provoking tensions, Russia wouldn't feel the need to guard the borders. I fail to see any difference in Obama's policies on Georgia than Bush's, so much for change, America and NATO are still provoking tensions, they won't be happy til they (America)starts another war

Related Content
Close