Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

FOCUS

How corruption has damaged Armenia's environment

Read more

THE INTERVIEW

'Changing FARC peace deal would be a huge historical error for Colombia'

Read more

TALKING EUROPE

EU ombudsman: 'Just raising an issue can be sufficient to change things'

Read more

TALKING EUROPE

Trouble in the eurozone: New Italian government puts pressure on establishment

Read more

IN THE PRESS

Celebrations after Mexico's win against Germany prompts 'fan-made' earthquake

Read more

YOU ARE HERE

France's Basque country, where singing is sacred

Read more

PERSPECTIVE

Charitable donations: 'By 2024, we believe giving will be the norm'

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Ex-Carrefour boss urged to give up €13 million retirement package

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

Egypt, Morocco lose first World Cup matches after conceding last-minute goals

Read more

Business

Securing US ports: but at what cost?

Text by FRANCE 24

Latest update : 2009-05-09

Under a 2007 US law, all shipping containers bound for the United States must be searched for possible bombs. All the world's ports have until 2012 to comply or will be banned from shipping to the US. Critics say the project will be much too costly.

To what extent can the fight against terrorism justify the management of the global economy? All countries that trade with the United States are now facing this question. In accordance with a 2007 US law, known as House Resolution No. 1, all containers departing for the United States – some 18 million a year – must be checked for possible bombs. All the world’s ports have until 2012 to comply. If they fail to do so, they will no longer be allowed to export their goods to the leading global economic power.  

 

The port of Southampton in Great Britain is one of three ports in the world so far to have received the approval of the US Department of Homeland Security. From Southampton's quays each year nearly a million containers depart for destinations around the world. So it is here that the United States decided to test its unprecedented security program, which uses highly sophisticated technology, and is installed and financed entirely by the United States under the resolution (House Resolution No. 1: Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007).

 

Steven Young, director of the port of Southampton, said the United States asked Southampton to test the system and offered to pay for it, so the port agreed. He says he expects that when the rest of the world eventually comes into compliance with the new US security program, Southampton will be ahead of the curve.

 

Britain already has plans to expand the program beyond Southampton’s ports by the 2012 deadline, as it also expects that the countries quickest to adopt the new US system will have a strategic advantage over their competitors.

Date created : 2009-05-09

COMMENT(S)