by Charles Smyth (not verified) - 14/07/2009 - 12:07
The apportioning of blame for the atrocities of World War 2, can also be extended to the German voters who willingly and overwhelmingly voted, for the Nazis, without consideration of the possible consequences, even though prior action by the Nazis towards the Jews and others, was well known. The degree to which Mr Demjanjuk is culpable, has yet to be ascertained. And contemporary democrats, must think beyond the drama of this trial, and make responsible choices to secure their future, which does not include the destruction of 317 cars, and counting, as a prelude to Bastille Day.
by Agatha King (not verified) - 14/07/2009 - 03:14
I think the mistake has been made in the brief comment: instead of Poland should be occupied Poland by the Nazis during the WWII. Poland was not independent country but under the Occupation of The Third Reich...
Comments (2)
Responsibility has a wider context.
The apportioning of blame for the atrocities of World War 2, can also be extended to the German voters who willingly and overwhelmingly voted, for the Nazis, without consideration of the possible consequences, even though prior action by the Nazis towards the Jews and others, was well known. The degree to which Mr Demjanjuk is culpable, has yet to be ascertained. And contemporary democrats, must think beyond the drama of this trial, and make responsible choices to secure their future, which does not include the destruction of 317 cars, and counting, as a prelude to Bastille Day.
Demjaniuk and the trial
I think the mistake has been made in the brief comment: instead of Poland should be occupied Poland by the Nazis during the WWII. Poland was not independent country but under the Occupation of The Third Reich...