Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

FOCUS

Video: Far right at the gates of power in Austria

Read more

FRANCE IN FOCUS

FRANCE 24 turns 10: A look behind the scenes

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

Gambia's Yahya Jammeh concedes defeat in presidential polls

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Gambians herald 'new independence' after Jammeh defeat

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

Hollande, the One Term President (part 1)

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

Trump Keeps 'Em Guessing, Italian Referendum, Austrian Election, Castro's Death (part 2)

Read more

FASHION

Discovering the winter 2016/2017 men's fashion collections in Paris

Read more

ENCORE!

Rendez-vous on '42nd Street' as the meta musical comes to Paris

Read more

REPORTERS

Uzbekistan reinforces its tight grip on election and country

Read more

SCIENCE

South Korean stem cell scientist convicted for faked research

Latest update : 2009-10-26

A South Korean scientist who claimed to have created the world's first stem cell line from a cloned human embryo was given a two-year sentence for embezzling research funds and for ethical lapses.

AFP - A South Korean court Monday imposed a suspended prison term on a disgraced scientist whose claims of stem cell breakthroughs rocked the scientific world until his research was found to be faked.
   
The court passed a two-year sentence suspended for three years on Hwang Woo-Suk after convicting him of embezzling research funds and of ethical lapses in obtaining human eggs for experiments.
   
It found him not guilty of defrauding private entities which had contributed funds to his research.
   
Prosecutors had demanded a four-year jail term for Hwang, 56, who went on trial in June 2006. He remained expressionless as the verdict was read.
   
Judges ruled he had known that his team "exaggerated or manipulated" some experiments, although they found no evidence he directly instructed them to do so.
   
Hwang shot to fame in 2004 when he published a paper in the US journal "Science" claiming to have created the world's first stem cell line from a cloned human embryo.
   
In a follow-up paper in 2005 in the same journal, he maintained that his team had developed 11 patient-specific embryonic stem cell lines.
   
The claims raised hopes of new treatments for diseases such as cancer, diabetes and Parkinson's.
   
The government showered Hwang and his team from the prestigious Seoul National University (SNU) with money and honours. Hwang was awarded the title of "Supreme Scientist".
   
But his reputation was tarnished in November 2005 amid allegations that he had violated medical ethics by accepting human eggs from his own researchers.
   
Hwang apologised for the lapse but the scandal widened with reports from local television network MBC that his entire research was fabricated.
   
In January 2006 an SNU investigative team ruled in a report that his findings were faked and said he had produced no stem cells of any kind.
   
But he still retains a loyal following.
   
After sentence was passed, supporters inside the courtroom clapped and shouted "Doctor Hwang, cheer up!" Hwang smiled and shook hands with them. saying his lawyers would decide whether to appeal.
   
About 100 supporters outside wildly applauded Hwang as he walked out through a crowd of journalists. The court received petitions from 55 lawmakers and others calling for leniency.
   
Hwang was also found guilty of breaching a law on bioethics which bans illegal human egg transactions. "Hwang and his team failed to prove that they were not involved in illegal trading of human eggs," the verdict said.
   
The judges said Hwang had misappropriated a combined 830 million won (704,000 dollars) in research funds by using borrowed bank accounts or manipulating tax bills.
   
But they said he did not do so for personal profit.
   
Hwang's work in creating Snuppy (Seoul National University puppy), the world's first cloned dog, has been independently verified.
   
While on bail during the trial, he focused on animal cloning after losing his government licence for human stem cell research.    
   
"His brilliant achievements in animal experiments, his sincere repentance and the fact he was already disciplined by his school should be considered," the judges said.
   

 

Date created : 2009-10-26

COMMENT(S)