It’s a big day for Eric Besson. As France’s minister of immigration and national identity, Besson will spend the next three months encouraging and monitoring a debate on French national identity that he officially launched on Monday. Certain controversial ideas have already been floated, such as requiring schools to teach the national anthem.
Besson has reportedly sent an information kit to regional officials who have been charged with organising public meetings on the issue. The ruling Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) party’s parliamentary groups have also been invited to take part. And Besson’s team has launched an Internet site to gather the varied opinions of the French public on the issue, some of which are likely to be quite controversial.
But those within the political community did not wait for the official launch of the debate to make their opinions heard, with both the left and the right flooding Besson’s office with criticism soon after the debate was first announced on October 25.
The left-of-centre opposition has denounced the whole debate as a political exercise designed to drum up support ahead of March 2010 regional elections. “(French President) Nicolas Sarkozy wants to shore up his support among those who support the far-right National Front,” Benoît Hamon, the Socialist Party’s spokesman, told Europe 1 radio.
To prevent the government from gaining the upper hand on a topic so close to the hearts of its supporters, the anti-immigration National Front has criticised the UMP for not going far enough with the debate. Marine Le Pen, second in command at the National Front, on Wednesday requested an interview at the presidential palace.
In announcing his initiative, Besson has also attracted his share of criticism from the ruling party. High commissioner Martin Hirsch called the debate “100% political” and former minister of housing Christine Boutin denounced it as “very risqué”.
Results moved up
Having suffered in the past few weeks from controversies surrounding nepotism charges related to his son, Jean, and the suspected paedophilia tendencies of his minister of culture, Frédéric Mitterrand, Sarkozy has decided to steer the electorate onto safer topics: taxes, security and immigration.
In a bid to address critics who say the debate is merely an electoral ploy, Besson moved up the date for releasing the results by three weeks to February 4. He told Le Figaro daily that, in doing so, he wished to distance the release of the results somewhat from the March regional polls.
According to a CSA poll published by Le Parisien, 60 percent of those surveyed say they favour having a debate on the subject of national identity. But according to a separate poll by BVA-Canal+ published on Thursday, 64 percent think that the debate is, “above all”, a move geared toward mobilising right-wing voters ahead of regional elections.






















Comments (3)
It is the text that is the problem not people
Rather than France's immigration minister attacking defenceless pieces of clothing the minister should address the real cause of concern religious text which promotes violence.
It is not the architecture such as the minarets and steeples, or clothing, Muslim veils and Christian headscarves but text which defines people as other in religious texts in such a way which enables the idea that violence is not only acceptable but deemed as a sanctioned method to promote the power of religion.
Credible fear of religions which from their first pages dehumanises nonbelievers (infidels, heathens, etc.) are indicative of the credible fear of oppressive violent behaviour generated historically and currently from all existing major religious text.
Sandra
Sarkozy needs to stand up to Islam and stop anymore immigration into France.
Where on earth do you get the
Where on earth do you get the idea that in a few short years the Unites States will be forced to become a Muslim country?? Muslims only make up a small proportion of the US population and in any case, America was created by immigrants who forced others off their land...how do you think America became a Christian country? You should wake up!
debate on 'national identity'
I applaud Frances' decision to finally broach the subject of identity. If someone wants to immigrate to France but not embraces its value and traditions, then why not just stay in they're own country. The point of trying to bring democracy around the world was to inspire people in their countries to effect a change for the better. Instead, they move where they think the grass is greener and want to take their cultural diversity where it is not wanted. If France continues on its present course, in 30 years time, it will be a Muslim country. Why shouldn't the citizens of Frances be afforded the choice of maintaining France the way they like it? I wish more people in the United States would wake up to this fact, or in a few short years, our children, and grand children will be forced to become Muslims. I believe the Muslims have just as much right to exist as anyone else, but they can do it in their own Muslim countries.
Post new comment