Don't miss




Fans and players react online to Arsene Wegner's club departure

Read more


Syria alleged chemical attack: Gunfire delays deployment of weapons inspectors

Read more


Cashing in on local French currencies

Read more


Life on the canals of northern France

Read more


What lies ahead for Cuba after the Castros?

Read more

#TECH 24

Discovering and harnessing the power of the sun

Read more


Can France bid 'adieu' to popular weedkiller glyphosate?

Read more

#THE 51%

Harmful for your health: When gender bias affects medical diagnosis

Read more


Africa’s donkeys slaughtered for Chinese ‘miracle elixir’

Read more


Obama leaning towards compromise strategy on Afghanistan, officials say

Text by News Wires

Latest update : 2009-11-13

As he wrangles over the question of sending further troops to Afghanistan, Barack Obama is leaning towards a compromise strategy that would reaffirm US resolve to help, but not indefinitely, officials say.

AFP - President Barack Obama is leaning towards a compromise strategy on troops to Afghanistan, officials said Thursday amid growing concerns over Kabul's government and the US envoy there advising against sending more reinforcements.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Obama was seeking to show a strong US commitment to Afghanistan while also conveying to President Hamid Karzai's corruption-tainted government that the US military presence had a time limit.
"How do you signal resolve and at the same time signal you are not going to be there forever?" asked Gates, adding that it was a challenge to "get that balance right."
Obama is said to have been presented with a series of options on Afghanistan, three of which envisage reinforcements ranging from 20,000 to 40,000 troops and a fourth that has an undisclosed military element.
He was examining how to "combine some of the best features of several of the options to maximum good effect," Gates said.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said no announcement would be made until Obama returns from Asia on November 19, adding that he expected more meetings with the military top brass before the president reached a decision.
"I know you may have seen Secretary Gates say today that the president is evaluating the options, choosing what's best in all of them.
"What the president wants to ensure is that we take into account... our time commitment and ensure that we have the strongest partner in the Afghan government," Gibbs told journalists aboard Air Force One.
Leaked cables from the US ambassador in Kabul underlined Thursday the perceived failings of Karzai and his government that have emerged as a key problem holding up Obama's troop decision.
Karzai, long supported internationally despite the fact his administration is widely viewed as corrupt, has seen ties with the West sour dramatically since being re-elected in a flawed poll in August.
Ambassador to Kabul Karl Eikenberry, a retired army general who commanded US forces in Afghanistan from 2005 to 2007, detailed serious concerns in classified cables leaked to The Washington Post and The New York Times.
He reportedly expressed reservations about Karzai's erratic behavior and warned against sending more American troops to Afghanistan until the Afghan leader gets a grip on the corruption and incompetence in his administration.
The ambassador's position puts him at odds with Afghan war commander General Stanley McChrystal, who wants more than 40,000 additional US troops over the next year and has warned that without them the mission is likely to fail.
Gibbs played down the differences between Eikenberry and McChrystal, suggesting everyone believed it was important for Karzai to turn around the tarnished image of his government.
"You've heard General McChrystal say, and you've heard Ambassador Eikenberry say, and you've quite frankly heard the president say that it's time to start a new chapter in Afghanistan when it comes to governance. And that's obviously going to play a big part in the decision that he makes."
Huge fraud that marred the August 20 presidential election highlighted the scale of corruption in Afghanistan's government and has led to enormous international pressure on Karzai's new administration to clean up.
Karzai was only declared the winner by election officials, whom he appointed, after his challenger, former foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah, abandoned a run-off saying there was no chance of a fair poll.
In a recent US television interview, Karzai dismissed allegations against top officials, including his brother Wali, who is widely accused of involvement in the opium trade.
The president has also faced widespread criticism for his alliances with warlords and one of his two picks for vice president, Mohammad Qasim Fahim, is widely accused of rights abuses.
The Afghan presidency hit back Thursday at the mounting Western concern over corruption, urging the international community to do its part by battling graft in aid contracts.
"We've pledged to the international community to further intensify our efforts against corruption. We are serious," Karzai's spokesman Siamak Herawi told AFP.
"At the same time, we want the international community to do more to eliminate corruption in spending aid money. We want the international community to eliminate corruption that exists in the contract systems."

Date created : 2009-11-13


    US envoy anxious over possible troop increase

    Read more

  • USA

    Obama holds 'productive' meeting on Afghanistan strategy

    Read more


    No extra troops to Afghanistan, says Sarkozy

    Read more