Latest update: 04/12/2009 

- Israeli settlements - Israeli-Palestinian conflict - Jerusalem


Stumbling blocks to peace

Last week the Palestinian Authority rejected the ten-month moratorium in settlement building in the West Bank put in place by Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. FRANCE 24 visits Gilo settlement, on the edge of Jerusalem.

By Marc de Chalvron and Annette Young
Today's Focus guests are Annette Young, FRANCE 24 correspondent in Jerusalem, and Israel Medad, a spokesman for the Yesha Council, an organisation representing Israeli settlers.
 

Perched on a hill just south of Jerusalem, Gilo overlooks the Holy City.

But on the other side of this Jewish settlement, the view is one of Israel's controversial security barrier separating Jerusalem from the West Bank.

For Gilo residents such as Shalom, the separation barrier's presence only confirms that Gilo is an integral part of Jerusalem and Israel. There's no reason, he says, to have a debate about whether to build now or in the future.

"The city is growing to the south, the north and to the east. It's normal when a city grows that is expands in all directions," he says.

Gilo is located in Arab East Jerusalem, captured by Israel during the 1967 war.

Now an established community with tree-lined streets and shops, its 30,000 residents don't see themselves as settlers. For them, they are living in a Jerusalem neighbourhood and cannot understand the recent controversy to build an additional 900 new homes.

Jerusalem City Council member Moshe Bensoussan took FRANCE 24 to the site where he says construction will soon begin.

The sweeping views of the city for this local council member only proves to him that Gilo is part of Jerusalem. And for him, Jerusalem is part of Israel, end of story.

"You know we really don't have a choice, there's not enough space here," he told FRANCE 24. "Look over there, you can see the Knesset, the parliament. Well, this is Jerusalem. Jerusalem, this is the red line for both the government and even for the opposition."

Haim Erlich from the Israeli organisation, Ir Amim, which promotes Palestinian-Israeli co-existence in Jerusalem, strongly disagrees. For him, the building will happen on the other side of Gilo, not overlooking Jerusalem but the West Bank instead.

The move to expand Gilo is part of a wider plan to ensure Israeli expansion south and east of Jerusalem, he says. It's a highly political decision, says the activist, and means the end of the Palestinian dream to have Jerusalem as the capital of their future state. 

"The Israeli authorities are trying to make a reality that south of East Jerusalem is Israeli so it's not up for future discussion," he tells FRANCE 24.

In southern Gilo and surrounded by new construction lives Palestinian resident Um Ramy with her family.

Um Ramy rents an old Arab house. She doesn't dream of a Palestinian state; instead her only dream is being able to stay put.

"Originally, this was Arab land, connected to the town of Bet Jala .. and of course today, the Jews took it all." she tells FRANCE 24. "This is Arab land. We don't want to leave. Even if the land is sold, I want to stay, not leave. This is an Arab house isn't it?"

So while the Palestinians condemn the absence of a settlement freeze in Jerusalem, the Israelis continue to build ...

AFGHANISTAN

The fight against opium

Opium and heroin trafficking in Afghanistan is a considerable source of revenue for the Taliban, but they are not the only ones who profit from it. In the meantime, the United States have radically changed their strategy in the war on drugs...
20/08/2009 - AFGHANISTAN

Far from the bombs and the ballots, refugees look for a home

While Afghans back home vote in an election marred by violence, thousands of refugees are looking for asylum abroad. Here in a Paris park, Afghans refugees have joined Iranians and Kurds in setting up a makeshift camp.

React to the article
Comment this article typing your message in the above text zone. Please note that this is limited to 1500 characters or less.
(4) Reactions

It is a question of human rights.

The Israelis need to be reminded of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Dec 10th 1948:

13/14: Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and return to his country.
17/2: No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Israel's policies of annexation and ethnic cleansing are clearly racists and in defiance of international law, and have been since it started. Why should the Palestinians have to negotiate for their own property? It is like asking the victim to negotiate with the burglar who has broken in to take over his house!

Whose land? Getting to the truth.

The Israeli settler claims the right of Jews to a homeland was granted by the international community. He is referring to the 1947 UN General Assembly Resolution 181, Partition Plan. Yet the same settler dismisses all other UN Resolutions resisting Israel's claims to Palestinian territory (eg Resolution 242) and the granting Palestinian refugees right to return (Resolution 191 which has been reaffirmed 130 times).
He also stated that the Arabs did not accept the Partition Plan and attacked the newly, unilaterally created Israel, conveniently saying nothing of the Jewish terrorists massacres of Deir Yassin and other Palestinian villages as part of the Dalet plan of ethnic cleansing, which occurred weeks before the Arab attacks.
Just about everything he said was lies or distortion, yet no challenge was made, nor the other (more truthful) point of view put forward. Shame on you!

Not Fair

I noticed how they ran those violent scenes all through your interview. That's called media bias.

Do they run backstage smooching between anchorman and anchorwomen, or smoking in the hallway, or imbibing some booze while they read the news?

jerusalem

Sirs;
Who on earth gave the so-called international community(whatever it is)and the Arabs the right to decide the fate of Jerusalem,a Hebrew city of our great king David,our capital for the last 3015 years?
The Arabs have no rights whatsoever over the city of David;they came in the 7th century CE as landrobbers and now they want our landof Israel?
As thir name shows-they are originally from the Arab peninsula and that's where they should return to.

Read more
Close