Latest update: 02/02/2010 

- health - science - Vaccine


The Lancet retracts study linking MMR vaccine and autism

The Lancet retracts study linking MMR vaccine and autism

Respected medical journal, The Lancet, formally retracted a 1998 paper by British doctor Andrew Wakefield (pictured) Tuesday which controversially linked autism with the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

By News Wires (text)
 

AFP - Medical journal The Lancet on Tuesday withdraw a 1998 study linking autism with innoculation against three childhood illnesses, a paper that caused a major storm and an enduring backlash against vaccination.
  
The British journal said it was acting in the light of an ethics judgement last week by Britain's General Medical Council against Andrew Wakefield, the study's lead researcher.
  
"We fully retract this paper from the published record," The Lancet's editors said in a statement published online.
  
The 1998 paper, based on a small sample of 12 children, implied a connection between an autism-like disorder and a triple vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella.
  
Although other experts said the claim was spurious, many parents in Britain were deeply alarmed and refused to have their children given the triple vaccine.
  
The slump in vaccine use has yet to fully recover today and as a result young, unprotected lives have been placed at risk, say doctors.
  
In 2004, 10 of the paper's 13 authors distanced themselves from part of the study, publishing what they called a "retraction of an interpretation."
  
In last Thursday's ruling, the General Medical Council attacked Wakefield for "unethical" research methods and for showing a "callous disregard" for the youngsters as he carried out tests.
  
He was also accused of acting in a "dishonest" and "irresponsible" way in describing the research.
  
"Following the judgement of the UK General Medical Council's Fitness to Practise Panel on January 28, 2010, it has become clear that several elements of the 1998 study by Wakefield et al are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation," The Lancet said.
  

Comments (2)

I want the truth, the WHOLE truth

The so-called studies that are saying vaccines do not cause autism really don't say that.

It is like the fat lady who eats pies, cookies, cakes, and ice cream. She stops eating vanilla ice cream and moans about how she has proven over and over again that the desserts do not cause obesity. Ever time she gives up one food and none of the weight comes off therefore eating desserts cannot contribute to her weight problem.

Dr. Andrew Moulden has done ample research on vaccines. He says ALL vaccines cause ministrokes. You can watch his videos on youtube or on his website brainguard.md.

There is also a new book out "The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic" by Heather Fraser. Heather found some interesting facts:

The WHO and FDA decided that refined peanut oil is GRAS and does not have to be listed on the package insert of pharmaceutical products.

If you want to know which vaccines might contain peanut oil, you cannot get the information even if you try using the Freedom of Information Act. It is a protected trade secret.

Currently 1 in 125 of our vaccinated children have a serious peanut allergy - smelling peanuts can cause them to have an anaphylactic reaction.

I want full disclosure of ALL vaccine ingredients.

Autism

My challenge to the "experts" would be to prove that a vaccine alone isn't traumatic to an immature neural system, and sufficient to cause the brain to go to altered functioning. The technology exists to monitor the brain response and immediate changes which could take place if there is a genetic proclivity, when given to infacts, especially boys.

Post new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close