- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 09/02/2010
- arms trade - defence - France - Russia
France defends decision to sell Russia amphibious warships
France defended its decision to sell Russia up to four amphibious assault ships Monday, despite US hesitation over the deal and vehement protest from the Baltic states.
By News Wires (text)
AFP - France defended on Monday its negotiations to sell Russia up to four amphibious assault ships, despite US doubts about the deal and protests from Moscow's nervous Baltic neighbours.
Having initially approached France to discuss the sale of one Mistral-class helicopter carrier, Russia has now said it wants four of the modern 21,000-tonne vessels, a senior French defence ministry official said.
Jacques de Lajugie, head of the international division of the ministry's arms production wing, said France was examining the request from Russian command and no decision had yet been made at a political level.
If the deal goes ahead, it would be the first such transfer of large-scale military technology from a NATO member to Moscow. But Defence Minister Herve Morin defended the principle behind the planned sale.
At a joint news conference with his US counterpart Robert Gates, Morin said the talks showed that Russia was now considered a partner in European security.
"We want to build a relationship of confidence and a new relationship with Russia," said Morin.
"We cannot on the one hand enlist Russia in building this security and at the same time consider that Russia has not profoundly changed since 1991," when the Soviet Union collapsed, he said.
The minister argued that refusing the sale would amount to "pursuing trade relations and exchanges with Russia as if it were the Russia of pre-1991."
During Monday's meeting in Paris, Morin discussed the deal with Gates, who commented tersely: "I would just say that we had a good and thorough exchange of views on it. I'll just leave it at that."
Gates later brought up the sale in talks with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, according to officials.
"This cooperation with Russia, the terms of which have not yet been defined, appears natural," Sarkozy told him, according to his office.
"We can't expect Russia to behave like a partner, and not ourselves behave like one," he said.
According to a French account of the meeting, Gates said that Washington's concerns were more about the political signal such a sale would send to Moscow than about any military threat the warships might pose to US allies.
Ex-Soviet Baltic states Estonia and Lithuania expressed concern that France is contemplating a deal that would strengthen Russia's ability to intervene in the countries of its region, as it did in its 2008 war with Georgia.
Foreign ministry spokeswoman Kersti Luha said Estonia had been pressing France for an explanation since plans for the deal were revealed in November.
"We raised the issue with France of Russia's desire to buy a French warship. We wished to find out what exactly would be sold to Russia and we plan to continue to ask for more information about the deal," Luha said.
"This trend deepens our concern. We're watching this agreement carefully," Lithuanian Defence Minister Rasa Jukneviciene told AFP.
She noted that she raised the issue at a NATO meeting last week in Istanbul.
"The French said the warship would be sold without armaments. What's clear now is that Russia's military industry lags far behind NATO's. If they sold it, it would be unprecedented," she added.
The Moscow daily Moskovski Komsomolets reported Monday that Russian President Dmitri Medvedev has decided to buy one Mistral from France for between 500 and 600 million euros (up to 820 million dollars).
The Mistral, the second largest warship in the French fleet, is a 200-metre (650-foot) amphibious assault vessel that can carry heavy-lift helicopters, landing craft, tanks and up to 900 commandos.
In December, six US senators expressed their concern over the proposed sale, which they said would send the message that France supports what they called Russia's "increasingly bellicose and lawless behaviour".
Related Content
Latest news reports on FRANCE, French politics and culture

























Comments (7)
Mistral LPDH
Interestingly even Indian Navy (IN) has a requirement of such Landing Platform Dock Helicopter (LPDH) and may approach French authorities for outright purchase or licence manufacture in her own yards.
Sayan.
It's hard to reject all French arguments
It's hard to reject all French arguments but as long as Russian national security doctrine poses the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (that includes France last time I checked) as primary threats to Russia - such a decision seems premature and schizophrenic, doesn't it? I'd love Russia to partner in European security, but I'd also love Russia to see threats where they really are...
And when I listen to Mr. Rasmussen saying that one have to understand Baltic States because of their history, but his bottom line is waving their concerns away as immature and oversensitive I'm getting simply annoyed. After all that's THE man who famously said that he doesn't see Russia as a threat to NATO. Well, since Russia does see NATO as a threat to Russia, I'd hazard a statement that such a perspective should get you fired if you are a secretary general of NATO, shouldn't it?
Wrong Route
Does it not seem more logical to build secure partnership with a country based around trading goods such as food or other products that benefit the citizenry? Trading military power is only going to upset surrounding nations and cause political tension. Moreover is the obvious lack of concern for France's military power and integrity. This is plainly thoughtless. It would appear that the result of this "trade" is more harmful than beneficial.
Obviously there is some
Obviously there is some concern about transfers of technology and in the free world everyone is aloud a voice. In the end it will be Frances who makes the decision, not the US nor any other country. In any case, it’s inevitable that in this new global landscape Russia should become more of a partner and concerns over technology can be address as partners
The USA isn't relevant to
The USA isn't relevant to this topic, why do Europeans always feel it necessary to bring them in to it. You know that "two wrongs don't make a right" thing? Anyway, The U.S. isn't selling massive warships to countries they or their allies have a history of hostility with, France is.
Foolish French
When the wolf is at your door, does it make any sense whatsoever to feed that wolf and make him stronger to eventually attack YOU? What shortsighted policy on the French government's part. This has to be about the money, right?
France defends decision to sell Russia amphibious warships
well, its true, USA always have to say a words who ever doing something in EU, USA think they have a right over EU, i dont understand why EU doenst have the right over USA, when they want sale or bus something from other part of the world.
its just unacceptable for us, USA should stop asking EU what do or what to not.
Post new comment