Latest update: 06/04/2010 

- Iran - North Korea - nuclear weapons - USA


Obama unveils new policy limiting US use of nuclear arms

The Obama administration has unveiled a policy restricting US use of nuclear weapons, but sent a message to Iran and North Korea that they remain potential targets. Obama is expected to sign a landmark arms control treaty with Russia on Thursday.

By Oliver FARRY (video)
News Wires (text)
 

REUTERS - The Obama administration unveiled a new policy on Tuesday restricting U.S. use of nuclear weapons but sent a stern message to nuclear-defiant Iran and North Korea that they remain potential targets.

Kicking off a hectic week for President Barack Obama’s nuclear agenda, his aides rolled out a strategy review that renounced U.S. development of new atomic weapons and could herald further cuts in America’s stockpile.

The announcement, calling for reduced U.S. reliance on its nuclear deterrent, could build momentum before Obama signs a landmark arms control treaty with Russia in Prague on Thursday and hosts a nuclear security summit in Washington next week.

But Obama’s revamped strategy is likely to draw criticism from conservatives who say his approach could compromise U.S.  national security and disappoint liberals who wanted the president to go further on arms control.

Under the revamped policy, the United States for the first time is forswearing use of atomic weapons against non-nuclear countries, a break with a Bush-era threat of nuclear retaliation in the event of a biological or chemical attack.

But the new strategy comes with a major condition that the countries will be spared a U.S. nuclear response only if they are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  That loophole means Iran and North Korea would not be protected.

The Nuclear Posture Review is required by Congress from every U.S. administration but Obama set expectations high after he vowed to end « Cold War thinking » and won the Nobel Peace Prize in part for his vision of a nuclear-free world.

Seeking to set an example, the Obama administration said the United States would consider use of nuclear weapons only in « extreme circumstances » and committed to not developing any new nuclear warheads.

But it said that while reducing the role of nuclear weapons in national security, the United States would strengthen its conventional arsenal.

The administration also pledged to pursue further arms control with Russia beyond the new START pact Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev will sign this week promising to slash nuclear arsenals by a third.

Obama now faces the challenge of lending credibility to his arms control push while not alarming allies under the U.S.  defense umbrella or limiting room to maneuver in dealing with emerging nuclear threats from Iran and North Korea.

The review is a test of Obama’s effort to make controlling nuclear arms worldwide a signature foreign policy initiative.  It is also important because it will affect defense budgets and weapons deployment and retirement for years to come.
 

Comments (4)

I can't believe how many

I can't believe how many people actually think the US planned and executed 9/11 themselves. There is no evidence to support that. Yet, despite the lack of evidence, half of the Middle East and a sizable percentage of the EU actually thinks Yanks and Jews conspired in mass murder so they could go on a war path and invade all the Muslim countries. The US invaded Iraq out of fear of WMDs spreading. After there were no WMDs, they looked like fools. Bush and Cheney exaggerated the evidence and ignored everyone who questioned their logic. Now it seems the USA has gotten smarter and realized that preventing the proliferation of fissile material will do more to help keep weapons out of the hands of terrorist groups. Well done. It's a start. All the anti-US chatter is a little ridiculous. The Yanks now have a more responsible nuclear policy than the UK, China or France and are co-operating with Russia fairly well. My only guess as to why has to be fear. Fear of fissile material spreading and a desire to do something about it. The same fear that spread after 9/11, but now more analysis and smarter decisions. This treaty ignores Israel and probably won't have much of an effect on Iran, but as far as I'm concerned it helps make clear that the USA is at least wanting a more peaceful world in theory, if not in practice. It also shows that the Russians are at least reasonable world citizens. The Iranians, in contrast, just look crazier every day. So do the conspiracy theorists in the EU and Middle East.

War

Priority: The right to take precedence. For example stopping this unjust war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Was it not his promise to the people of America? As I look for answers on the War of 911. I can not blame Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea. I believe that the United States Government has the answers and had the answers before the attacks occurred. They wished to nothing for this reason. To wage war on the poor, the weak, and the defenseless. Why not wage war on drugs, illegal immigration, those two alone have damaged this country more than 911 itself. I say they (the current administration) cater to illegals, and law breaks just for a buck. What I mean to say that corruption runs ramped. I say also the advocate's of democracy had for knowledge of Sept 11, 2001.

Richard Salazar Jr
Not a Democrat.

Obama unveils new policy limiting US nuclear arms

Befitting such a President and world-leader, our wrestle with something more terrible than War--"annihilation"!

Obama's New Nuke Policy

The much hyped policy change is actually a cosmetic exercise to promote Barack Obama's image as a great pacifist devoted to universal peace and deserving the Nobel prize already awarded to him in advance.Otherwise,the limiting of the possible uses of the WMD is so puny as to be laughable considering the laudable goal of making these weapons obsolete.And what with sevearal countries poised to acquire the nukes sooner or later this pious pronouncement of Barack Obama will have no impact whatever on the serious issue of nuclear weapons.We can expect more of such empty gestures in the days ahead from Obama as he approaches his re-election in 2012 with much trepidation.

Post new comment
Note: Comment moderation is enabled on this page. Your comment will only be visible once approved by the administrators.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close