- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 07/05/2010
- demonstrations - political crisis - Red Shirts - Thailand
Policeman shot dead as Red Shirts refuse to disperse
One policeman was shot dead and seven people, including five police, were injured in a series of explosions in Bangkok late Friday. The violence erupted as the "Red Shirts" refused to call off mass protests in the Thai capital.
By News Wires (text)
REUTERS - A Thai policeman was killed and seven people injured, including five police, when a drive-by shooting and a series of explosions shook Bangkok’s heavily guarded business district late on Friday.
The shooting and explosions, which police suspected were grenades, took place after midnight in the Silom Road area guarded by soldiers and packed with hotels and bars popular with tourists. The area is close to the entrance to a fortified encampment held by anti-government protesters for four weeks.
The incidents will raise tensions in the capital after a week of calm as “red shirt” demonstrators hinted they may be able to strike a deal in the coming days to end a deadly crisis that has killed 28 people and wounded more than 1,000.
Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has put forward a plan to end the rallies that have crippled the capital and scared off tourists, but it remained in limbo as rival factions squabbled over details, including a proposed early election in November.
“We are not calling off protests as yet,” Jaran Ditapichai told Reuters after meeting fellow leaders. “We have a proposal for Abhisit and we will talk about it in more detail later.”
The stand-off has paralysed the commercial heart of the capital for nearly two months, but its roots stretch back to the prime ministership of Thaksin Shinawatra—a populist tycoon ousted in a 2006 military coup—and the deep social divisions it exposed between Thailand’s traditional elite and rural masses.
Thai stocks fell 2.1 percent on Friday, but other Asian markets were also in negative territory. Thai stocks have given up gains scored on Tuesday, when the index jumped 4.4 percent in reaction to Abhisit’s reconciliation plan.
Stay or go?
Abhisit offered to dissolve parliament in the second half of September ahead of an election on Nov. 14 as part of a plan to end a crisis in which 28 people have died and more than 1,000 wounded in clashes.
But that failed to convince the mostly rural and urban poor “red shirt” protesters who have refused to budge from the commercial district, where upscale malls and luxury hotels have been forced to close their doors since April 3.
A local business group put revenue losses in the area since April 3 at about 174 million baht ($5.4 million) a day.
At least 10,000 protesters rallied on Friday night at the heavily barricaded camp covering 3 sq km (1.2 sq miles) of an upmarket commercial district in central Bangkok.
Friday’s shooting took place just 50 metres from the fortified front lines of the red shirt encampment in a business district packed with hotels, banks and offices close to the city’s famous Patpong go-go dancing bars. No arrests were made.
One policeman died during emergency surgery.
The wounded included two « multi colours » protesters among a group of several dozen who had gathered to voice their opposition to the red shirts near a branch of Krung Thai Bank, the same location targeted in M-79 grenade attacks on April 22 that killed one and wounded more than 80.
Reuters reporters heard three loud blasts in quick succession in the same area about two hours after the shooting and hospital sources confirmed four policemen had been injured by the explosions. Police suspected grenades may have been used and an investigation was under way.
There were mixed signals on Friday from the red shirt camp that broadly backs Thaksin, who is loved by many among the rural poor but loathed by conservative elites and middle classes, who accuse him of corruption and disloyalty to the monarchy.
« Most leaders are ready to leave. A couple of leaders are still concerned that leaving the streets now would mean failure for the movement, » said protest leader Kwanchai Praipanna.
Complicating the picture, Abhisit faces some opposition from the government’s traditional backers after the yellow shirt group, which broadly represents the anti-Thaksin royalist elite and the middle classes, condemned his plan.
The yellow shirts, whose eight-day occupation of Bangkok’s airport in 2008 helped undermine a Thaksin-allied government, said Abhisit should resign if he cannot enforce the law and end the occupation of the shopping district.
The red shirts, who had demanded immediate elections when their latest protest rally started in mid-March, say the ruling coalition lacks a popular mandate after coming to power in a controversial parliamentary vote 17 months ago.
Protest leaders are demanding a specific date for dissolution of parliament—a technicality analysts said was probably an excuse to negotiate a better deal.



























Comments (3)
Political Unrest
I've lived in Thailand for 10 month in 2009 when yellow shirts protest and it made alots of problem for every one. At that time Thaksin have to leave Thailand and Abhisit became government leader. At that time that what Thai people want? But now The Red shirts make more problem for every one again! What really do Thai people want? It seem like Thai people don't know what do they want! Why people don't respect the laws? Why people who enfoce the law not do the right thing? Why every one say that they ove the king but can not do what they say?Why every one don't help eachother and work thing out in peace?Why Have to cause problem for every one? Why don't every one help to make Thailand to grow and rich in culture and full of smile.Why we don't stop fighting eachother.Iwas born in Thai land too.And I love Thailand the land of my mother.
political unrest
i lived in thailand for 11 years conducting business , the corruption and greed i faced forced me to leave. My wife had to leave her home she loves. i wish all these negatives could come to an end .it is a beautiful kingdom and i hope that all this unrest would stop. i would love to take my wife back , someday to the place she loves.
In the period after the
In the period after the abdication in 1932 the Thai military hijacked and secured their rule.
Since then the military, using the monarchy as cover and in cooperation with big business families (generally grouped as the Bangkok Elites), has been in control of Thailand with various thin layers of civilian and political leaders rising and falling at the whim of the military.
The military in the aftershock of 1992 allowed the writing of a reasonably democratic constitution and allowed, facilitated even, Thaksin Shinawatra to take power after his election win.
As usual it wasnt long before the military discovered that Thaksins popularity looked like it could threaten their power and wealth creation schemes. After he was re-elected, they funded the PAD and others to campaign for his removal.
The 2006 coup and aftermath is now history and the military are still trying to put Thaksin's "spawn" back into their museum.
Until someone is able to control the military, lock them in their barracks, banned from any involvement in business, politics and any actions inside the country, attempts at democracy will fail in Thailand.
Without the military, the government, reds with Peu Thai representing the majority of people and the police acting in their normal crime catching and crowd control roles will be able to act like normal political rivals and develop democratic solutions.
The insurgency in the south of Thailand will also subside since it is fuelled primarily by the same rule by the military ("Bangkok elites") that is inspiring the reds only more so because the military in the south are exercising their violence, sadism and illegal businesses at levels so far not permitted to them, except in treating certain groups like refugees and "illegal migrant workers" in the rest of the country.
Fears of the PAD, and even perhaps the reds, disturbing the peace and distorting political outcomes will evaporate when no group is able to call on or be inspired by military support.
Bottling the military is an ongoing challenge for every democracy, for example witness the recent upsurgence of military power in the US, but must be achieved and sustained.
Now, how can someone achieve this in Thailand?
Post new comment