Open

Coming up

Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

WEB NEWS

Web users react to Cuba and the US normalizing relations

Read more

WEB NEWS

Connected toys are a must-have for Christmas

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

The 'world’s unluckiest man' turns misfortune into a golden opportunity

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Better not get sick this Christmas!

Read more

#THE 51%

Are toys really us?

Read more

REPORTERS

Argentina: The Kirchner era

Read more

AFRICA NEWS

Tunisia presidential elections: Final day of campaigning ahead of Sunday's vote

Read more

FRANCE IN FOCUS

Holiday season: celebrating a secular Christmas

Read more

ENCORE!

Child brides, the people of Syria and New York’s homeless

Read more

Sports

Nadal beats arch rival Federer to win Madrid Open

Text by News Wires

Latest update : 2010-05-16

Rafa Nadal reasserted his dominance over Roger Federer on clay and laid down a marker for the French Open when he overwhelmed his arch rival 6-4 7-6 in the final of the Madrid Open.

AFP - Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer 6-4, 7-6 (7/5) to win the Madrid Masters on Sunday, gaining revenge for the defeat he suffered at the hands of the world number one in last year's final.
  
Nadal collected his 18th career Masters 1000 title, one more than Andre Agassi and two ahead of Federer.
  
The Spaniard now leads Federer 14-7 in career meetings with ten victories from a dozen meetings on clay. Nadal has won six of their past seven meetings.
  
Nadal, who will retake the world number two ranking on Monday, also swept the spring Masters events on clay with a hat-trick of trophies at Monte Carlo, Rome and now Madrid.
  
The Spanish champion stands 28-2 in clay finals, his only pair of losses coming against Federer.

Date created : 2010-05-16

  • ROME MASTERS

    Nadal equals Agassi's Masters record with Rome victory

    Read more

  • ROME MASTERS

    Nadal passes Gulbis test, reaches final against Ferrer

    Read more

  • TENNIS - ROME MASTERS

    World number one Federer starts clay-court season with a defeat

    Read more

COMMENT(S)