- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 30/07/2010
- Afghanistan war - Robert Gates - US military
WikiLeaks files pose 'risk’ to troops and allies, says Gates
The leak of 92,000 classified documents on the Afghan war by the WikiLeaks website has posed "dangerous" risks for US troops in battle and for relationships with allies in the region, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday.
AFP - Leaked US documents on the Afghan war posed "dangerous" risks for Americans in battle and for US relationships in the region, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday.
The Pentagon would "aggressively investigate" who was behind the leak and had asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation to help in the probe, Gates told reporters.
The leak of 92,000 classified documents by the website WikiLeaks contained no new information and did not call into question the US strategy in the Afghan war, said Gates and the US military's top officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, at a press conference.
Gates, however, said "the battlefield consequences of the release of these documents are potentially severe and dangerous for our troops, our allies and Afghan partners, and may well damage our relationships and reputation in that key part of the world."
"Intelligence sources and methods, as well as military tactics, techniques and procedures will become known to our adversaries," he said.
The defense secretary promised "a thorough, aggressive investigation to determine how this leak occurred, to identify the person or persons responsible, and to assess the content of the information compromised."
Gates promised to take steps to protect the lives of US service members as well as Afghans possibly exposed by the leaks.
The massive leak jeopardized the trust vital to gathering intelligence in the field, said Gates, a former CIA director.
"We have considerable repair work to do," to fix relationships damaged by the leak, he said.
Related Content
Latest news reports on FRANCE, French politics and culture




























Comments (1)
is the secretary correct about danger to troops?
i don't buy into the administration's argument that the wikileaks posting is endangering american/un troops. what is the most important thing for me is that it proves the argument pakistan's ISI is colluding with "the enemy", actually poor, uneducated afghanis trying to protect their own national identity.
i would rather my government "lives in the light", i support sunshine laws. and i know i am in the minority, as both democrats and republicans make just oodles of money on the military-industrial complex. it is not fair, but they have made what they do 'legal'. i would rather have my tax dollars go to supporting the poor, water and education projects, especially for girls, and seed money provided for women's small business- but there is no big money reward for that, for our fat governments. since herodotus we have had a problem of us v. them, the west v. the east. until we have respect, there will be no "change we can believe in". the whole burka argument is a galling racist baiting game. it's a shame that it is the women and children who pay the heaviest price in this game of brinksmanship. you cannot trust our governments, even though we 'vote'- money is god.
hopefully by the time my nieces and nephews build the society, we will be free of incompetence, payola, nuclear energy (the biggest lie there is), or racism- but don't bet on it.
jp in gay sf, ooh my!
Post new comment