Breaking News
Facebook
Share :
Subscribe :
Twitter
Share :
Subscribe :
Latest update: 08/09/2010 

- France - Nicolas Sarkozy - strike - unions


Sarkozy vows to raise pension age despite protests

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has rejected calls to back down on raising the retirement age from 60 to 62 years after a day of nationwide strikes to protest his government's plan to overhaul pensions.

By Mairead DUNDAS (video)
FRANCE 24 (text)
 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Wednesday he was willing to tweak his proposed legislation to overhaul pensions but refused to back down on raising the retirement age from 60 to 62 by 2018.

One of Sarkozy’s few concessions concerns special exceptions for those who start working before the age of 18 and for certain physically demanding jobs.

French Junior Minister Georges Tron told BFM radio that proposed concessions would cost up to one billion euros.

The announcement comes as French unions threatened to continue striking over the unpopular reform.

Tuesday's street protests drew over a million people nationwide in what was seen as a high-stakes showdown between the country’s largest labour unions and Sarkozy's administration.

Speaking to the mass crowds in Paris on Tuesday afternoon, François Chereque, leader of the CFDT union said: “If the government refuses to negotiate there will be further protests. There are other ways of paying for our pensions other than raising the minimum retirement age, such as raising taxes on those earning the most.”

The protest in pictures

Opposition Socialist Party leader Martine Aubry urged Sarkozy to “restart from zero” the effort to reform pensions. “In a democracy, when the people are on the streets, when they are more than two million and many more that support them, we need to listen,” Aubry said Wednesday.

Socialist Party spokesperson Benoit Hamon said concessions announced by Sarkozy were "tiny improvements" that would do little to appease the unhappy public.

Union leaders are scheduled to meet Wednesday afternoon to decide what to do next and whether to call for another strike, possibly on Oct 18.

A big gamble for all

The strikes were planned to coincide with Labour Minister Eric Woerth’s presentation of proposed pension reforms to parliament on Tuesday.

Woerth, for his part, has been embroiled for months in the ongoing L’Oreal heiress scandal, one of a number of controversies that have dragged Sarkozy’s approval rating down to record lows.

Sarkozy, however, remains undeterred by his low poll ratings and the challenge from the unions, stating repeatedly that he will do what it takes to get the unpopular legislation passed. 

A day after the massive rallies, the French press predicted that Sarkozy would not gamble away his political future by accepting a defeat on pensions, but would likely make some concessions to the opposition and to unions.

The international media came up with similar verdicts in their coverage of France's pensions battle.

In an online editorial, BBC’s Europe Editor Gavin Hewitt wrote that “the expectation is that Mr Sarkozy will eventually get his way […] For the French president, these are crucial weeks that may well determine his political future.

According to UK’s Guardian, “this is a make-or-break moment for the unions and for Nicolas Sarkozy, who sees a pensions victory as the centre piece of a range of reforms which will transform his faltering presidency.

Urgent austerity measures

Financial dailies warned that the pension burden is steadily becoming less sustainable and that urgent action was required.

This year alone, the pension programme is expected to run a 10-billion-euro deficit. That debt, they predict, will skyrocket to 50 billion euros by 2020 if the austerity proposals are not approved.

According to the Wall Street Journal, "scenes from France and the UK this week are confirmation that Europe's political elite haven't sold workers and households on the austerity thing.

"That's dangerous, with financial markets and ratings agencies never blinking when looking for signs of weakening on deficit-reduction programs.

"Governments in the rest of Europe, tempted to lower the steam with a few concessions, need only take a trip to Athens," the Journal warned.

Comparing French benefits to those in the US, the conservative daily said that “US workers would shake their heads in disbelief at retiring at that age with full benefits. But they aren't in Lille or Lyons and haven't paid into a generous system for others that now looks more elusive for them.”

And for the Guardian, "France's pension provisions are more generous than those of most of its neighbours. Trimming them a little might seem to outsiders not unreasonable, given that the pensions burden is steadily becoming less sustainable as the ratio of retirees to people in work worsens."

 

Comments (5)

Sarkozy and pension reforms

I thought like many people when Sarkozy came to power in France,that he was a reformer.Sadly over the years he as disappointed many people.He is more of a actor than a real politician,he knows how to please an audience,but behind the theatre,and all the show there is no real substance,no real far reaching reforms.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly French politicians crumble at the sight of the slightest street protests.They seem to lack any real conviction to face reform,and France as been making excuses for years not to reform its economy,and public services.
Now Sarkozy is in a panic as his time in office is running out,and now he only as himself to blame,as he as never faced down the French unions.He starts things,but never finishes them,and that is his real weakness.

A better description

The article does not make it clear that the age in question, 60, is the age at which partial benefits can be received. Full benefits are not received until 65. Contrary to statements like, "US workers would shake their heads in disbelief at retiring at that age with full benefits", this is not very different from the US, where partial benefits are received at 62 and full benefits at 66. (The age for full benefits will rise in the future).

Social Security Admin vs. Private Retirement Funds vs. Municipal

Americans were upset when the retirement age was proposed to increase from 65 to 67, due to increased costs, but the federal government has refused to increase payroll deductions from younger workers by even 5% in order to support the elderly and disabled. Private Retirement funds generally rely on Real Estate Investments Trusts, which generally hold steady with a ROI of 8%, and down to 6%, when commercial rentals experience high levels of vacancies. There are no laws prohibiting foreign governments from owning American lands. Municipal retirement programs tend to be much more generous, but much more conservative with the portfolio mixes. The retirement ages differ, benefits differ based upon job classification, and may be separate or combined with Workers' Compensation insurance systems. These are much more flexible with retirement age, disability laws, and pooling of funds with provincial funds.

strikes

Excuse me nut a 24 hour strike is nothing to a man with a head as big as the earth. He is an arrogant man who needs to be taught a lesson. France needs to come together and strike until he changes his tune. Remember the government does not pay TAXES and has the means to live on there monies at 60 or 70. We French people and the back breakers here and we run the country so why don't we do something besides talk about it. STRIKE....

Not that old

I really don't see the problem with raising the retirement age. Indeed, I'd go so far as to say I'd be happy to see no set retirement age, as long as state and private pensions were able to pay out above a set age. In the UK we have a retirement age of 65, and I hope I'll be fit and healthy enough to work and enjoy it until I'm much older.

We also have to consider that, as people are living longer, the tax burden on the working population is increasing as the state support for pensioners costs more and more. Raising the retirement barrier helps this by 1: reducing the length of time a pension is paid for by starting it later and 2: increasing the amount of tax gained from the working population to help sustain those on pensions. The status quo in any developed country is unsustainable.

Post new comment
Note: Comment moderation is enabled on this page. Your comment will only be visible once approved by the administrators.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close