- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 02/11/2010
- David Cameron - defence - France - Nicolas Sarkozy
British press fears for Falklands amid military tie-up with France
Elements of the British press have expressed concern that despite close political ties at present, a 50-year military treaty with France could jeopardise Britain’s ability to react independently.
It has been dubbed the ‘Entente Frugale’ – the United Kingdom and France on Tuesday signed an unprecedented military cooperation treaty designed to help both countries remain global players while also saving money.
The 50-year deal includes a new joint rapid reaction force of up to 5,000 troops, a shared nuclear testing facility and, by 2020, the sharing of aircraft carriers.
The deal is seen as essential by defence leaders on both sides of the channel as huge cuts are made to military budgets.
Defence chiefs from both countries set out their stall in editorials in Britain’s respected right-leaning broadsheet the Daily Telegraph and France’s equally conservative Figaro on Tuesday.
UK Defence Secretary Liam Fox told the BBC there was “nothing in this treaty that restricts either country from acting where we want to in our national interest."
But in Britain’s traditionally anti-French popular press the mood was far more sceptical.
The UK’s two biggest-selling tabloids, the Daily Mail and the Sun – which together sell almost six million newspapers a day –, both raised the spectre of a catastrophic falling-out over issues that have the potential to divide the two nations politically.
Top of the list for the tabloids are the Falkland Islands, a small archipelago in the South Atlantic that was the scene of a bloody conflict in 1982 between the UK and Argentina, which both claim the Islands as their own.
Both papers argue that having an operational aircraft carrier – backed by independent political will – would be essential to counter any renewed aggression from Argentina.
And both believe this is an issue over which the French – unlikely to be led by a right-wing anglophile President like Nicolas Sarkozy for ever – would be likely to offer a “so-what” Gallic shrug and resolutely refuse to cooperate.
200-year-old prejudices
An opinion piece in the Daily Mail by retired Royal Irish Regiment Colonel Tim Collins – titled “Will we ever trust the French?” – opens with a reminder that “Horatio Nelson famously instructed his officers that, ‘you must hate a Frenchman as you hate the devil’ and that the Duke of Wellington proclaimed: ‘We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France.’”
“Well it seems now we are to be one with them – at least militarily,” he writes. “I must admit I am sceptical.”
Col. Collins remembers that France opposed British deployment to the Falkland Islands after the Argentine invasion of 1982, and worries that reliance on French aircraft carriers could put the British territory at risk.
“The problem is that, if we want to use a French aircraft carrier, we then have to seek the permission of the French,” he says. “If, for instance, the Falklands crisis were to flare up again, would they agree to their aircraft carrier braving the French-made Exocet missiles they sold to the Argentines to recover our islands? I very much doubt it.”
The Sun, which supported British Prime Minister David Cameron’s Conservative election campaign, is equally wary of cooperation with France.
Political editor Tom Newton Dunn writes that when the sharing of carriers begins in 2020, Britain and the UK “will take turns to jointly operate the 65,000-ton HMS Queen Elizabeth and 42,000-ton Charles de Gaulle.
“Paris could veto any British plea to dispatch the Charles de Gaulle to the South Atlantic if Argentina threatens UK territory again.”
Remembering France’s staunch opposition to the 2003 Iraq invasion, he concludes: “A strong, right-wing president like Nicolas Sarkozy would seem the perfect ally to our PM.
“He may be right. Today. What happens when elections come, faces change and agendas are redrawn?
“Neither man would have cooked up such a wing-and-a-prayer strategy if they weren't both broke.”



























Comments (9)
Strange, the British will
Strange, the British will want to use French aircraft when it suits them.
Try flying a French registered private aircraft or microlight to the UK, they will charge for it and then let the aircraft visit for 30 days in one year.
The French, however, will let a UK registered aircraft into France for free and will let the owner set up a flying school in France without him needing to French register the aircraft!
It is all take, take, take with the British.
to the person who said what
to the person who said what is important about the falklands.Apart from saying the same thing about Hawaii, the answer is simple.
the people.
they are British and wish to remain so. therefore we have the absolute right and obligation to defend them.
that and the suspected massive oil deposits in the British waters of the Falklands.
our friends across the pas de
we drive on the correct side of the road ,speck english,i dont think it will work out ,i think you french should build a pair of updated ,merchaile type carriers like the ones in the great liberation war of 1939-1945 ,if you wont to goanywhere ,go and you dont have to ask , we should update some older dritish planes to use on ours ,
our friend across the pas de calie
rememering a few years ago when our great leader maggi and her friend john nott desided to save money and scape a falkland defending ship ,the argies poped over ,maggies men went to get it back ,nead og bulits ,your niebours would not sell us any ,[belgium]
The Falklands?
As an American, I love our British cousins. But really...the Falklands??? For what exactly is it important? Strategic sheep watching maybe?
UK/France
Things must be bad in Downing Street if the UK thinks Argentina is still a credible threat.
Waht Idiot...
What idiot thought that this would be a good idea, the military and political leaders are so divided that they couldn't even organise a tea party without the others demands who should drink what and who would supply it. If this is supposed to show a kind of 'being united' then it will never work. This is regretably a further move to try an save money which in principal is a good idea, although the practicalities are far from being workable. What a stupid move.
bravory
If we get into a scrape,and the french are fighting with us,I hope they are more use than they were defending France in the 2nd world war
common sense!
It seems common sense to me-the UK and France are `relatively` large powers, and certainly the military leaders of Europe. they both have bugetary constraints yet are also the only European countries with the capacity or interest in global reach-as for the Brits/French being restricted vice versa, that is quite explicitly rejected and i dont get the fears. For one thing, it saves costs and arguably opens the scope for MORE Anglo French presence around the world if the British and French arent both duplicating the smae actions in areas where both countries interests are the same-so for example, if instead of having a British AND French ship running anti piracy patrols off Somalia, one could do that and the other ship could be sent to raid drug shipments coming from south America, etc etc
Post new comment