- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 17/03/2011
- Libya
Call for UN no-fly vote, fears of 'major atrocities' mount
Supporters of a no-fly zone called for a vote Thursday on a UN resolution aimed at stopping Gaddafi’s planes carrying out attacks. The US says it believes there is a significant risk of "major atrocities" by Gaddafi forces in Benghazi.
By News Wires (text)
AP - Supporters of a no-fly zone over Libya called for a vote Thursday on a U.N. resolution aimed at preventing Moammar Gadhafi’s planes from carrying out aerial attacks, while the United States, in a striking reversal, pushed for broader action to protect civilians from ground and sea attacks as well.
U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said the Obama administration is “fully focused on the urgency and the gravity of the situation on the ground,” where Gadhafi’s fighters are intensifying attacks and heading toward rebel-held Bengazi, Libya’s second-largest city, and is working “very hard” for a vote on Thursday.
“We are interested in a broad range of actions that will effectively protect civilians and increase the pressure on the Gadhafi regime to halt the killing and to allow the Libyan people to express themselves in their aspirations for the future freely and peacefully,” Rice told reporters after more than eight hours of closed-door talks Wednesday by Security Council ambassadors. “Those include discussion of a no-fly zone, but the U.S. view is that ... a no-fly zone has inherent limitations in terms of protection of civilians at immediate risk.”
According to a council diplomat who spoke on condition of anonmyity because the talks were private, Rice said the goal should be expanded from creating a no-fly zone to protecting civilians, meaning the international community must have all the tools it needs including authorization to use planes, troops or ships to stop attacks by Gadhafi’s air, land and sea forces.
President Barack Obama and his top national security aides had been cautious with calls for a no-fly zone, which the Pentagon described as a step tantamount to war. The U.S. fears involvement in Libya could further strain its already stretched military and entangle the country in an expensive and messy conflict in another Muslim country.
According to the diplomat, Rice said the U.S. will not act without Security Council authorization, does not want to put U.S. ground troops into Libya, and insists on broad international participation, especially by Arab states.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, traveling in the Mideast, said the turning point was the Arab League’s support over the weekend for a no-fly zone over Libya.
“That was an extraordinary statement,” Clinton said, noting that Arab nations were asking the U.N. Security Council to take action “against one of their own.”
Whether the Security Council does take action and authorizes “all necessary measures” to protect civilians remains to be seen.
China’s U.N. Ambassador Li Baodong, the current council president, told reporters “we hope we will have real progress tomorrow.”
After the sometimes heated council discussions, Britain and France formally submitted the draft resolution that would impose a no-fly zone to the U.N. Secretariat. France’s U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said the text was being sent to capitals overnight and can still be changed before being put to a vote in the 15-member Security Council.
The council was expected to resume closed-door discussions late Thursday morning.
The diplomat said Russia, which has veto power, raised serious questions about the use of force against Gadhafi and other council nations reacted cautiously including Germany and India.
Lebanon, France and Britain introduced the draft resolution Tuesday afternoon, spurred by the Arab League’s urgent call for a no-fly zone.
The initial draft resolution would establish a ban on all flights in Libyan airspace and authorize U.N. member states “to take all necessary measures” to protect civilians. But an amendment proposed by the United States and obtained by The Associated Press would authorize states “to protect civilians and civilian objects from the Gadhafi regime, including by halting attacks by air, land and sea forces under the control of the Gadhafi regime.”
The council diplomat said Rice told the ambassadors the Obama administration believes there is a significant risk of major atrocities by Gadhafi’s forces in Benghazi and wants the council to do everything possible to prevent that and protect civilians.
An Obama administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity because council discussions are private, said the United States is discussing a range of other concrete steps with allies, both at the United Nations and at NATO. Among those additional steps are greater humanitarian aid, supporting the Libyan resistance with money from seized Gadhafi-related assets, and greater enforcement of the U.N. arms embargo on Libya.
Russia’s U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, whose government had expressed misgivings about a no-fly zone, proposed that the council vote first on a resolution calling for a cease-fire in Libya. Rice told reporters a majority of council members did not support a separate cease-fire resolution but said that a call for a cease-fire could be incorporated in the no-fly resolution.
“We were not rejecting at all the larger resolution,” Churkin told reporters, adding that his country thought that the call for a cease-fire “could possibly prevent impending bloodshed in Libya.”
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon earlier Wednesday urged all sides in Libya to accept an immediate cease-fire.
Ban “is gravely concerned about the increasing military escalation by government forces, which include indications of an assault on the city of Benghazi,” U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said.
The U.N. chief warned that “a campaign to bombard such an urban center would massively place civilian lives at risk,” Nesirky said.
While Russia and Germany expressed doubts, France pushed for rapid action with Foreign Minister Alain Juppe saying in Paris that several Arab countries have pledged to participate in possible military action in the North African country.
Libya’s deputy U.N. ambassador Ibrahim Dabbashi, who supports the opposition, said five Arab countries have offered support.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy called on leaders of the 14 other Security Council nations to “fully shoulder their responsibilities and give support to this initiative.”
“Together, we can save the martyred people of Libya,” he wrote in a letter. “It is now a matter of days, if not hours. The worst would be that the appeal of the League of the Arab States and the Security Council decisions be overruled by the force of arms.”
Clinton said during a visit to Egypt on Wednesday that the Obama administration is consulting with the Arab League “about their understanding of the goals and modalities of a no-fly zone as well as other forms of support.”
Libya’s Dabbashi told reporters he expects a no-fly resolution to be adopted, with a provision that will also allow air strikes.
He stressed the urgency of council action, saying according to information the Libyan Mission has received, Gadhafi is preparing for two operations: One against the eastern city of Ajdabiya, which is already under siege using mercenaries in more than 400 vehicles that are already en route, and one against mountain villages in the west where tanks, heavy artillery and other weapons are being gathered for an assault.
The latest push for a ban on flights in Libya came as Gadhafi’s forces intensified offensives in the east and the west Wednesday with relentless shelling aimed at routing rebel holdouts.
France and Britain failed to win support for a no-fly zone during a two-day meeting of Group of Eight foreign ministers in Paris earlier Tuesday and the G-8’s final communique did not mention a flight ban, leaving any action to the Security Council.
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at the G-8 that his country wants more details and clarity from the Arab League about its proposals for Libya before approving any military intervention, and German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said his country was “very skeptical” about military action.
The Security Council on Feb. 26 imposed an arms embargo on Libya and ordered all countries to freeze assets and ban travel for Gadhafi and some close associates. It also referred the regime’s deadly crackdown on protesters to the International Criminal Court, for an investigation of possible crimes against humanity.
Read more
Breaking news from the MIDDLE EAST




























React to the article
(3) Reactions
hypocrisy of the western
it make me fill a bit sick ,yesterday gaddafi was their man to do business with,today their changed what wrong ? who do we believe now?
Libya
It would be interesting if, say, Arizona were to secede, to see which nations would aid them.
Why Libya
THE SITUATION IN LIBYA : A DILEMMA FOR THE IMPERIALISTS
Nobody with a bit of common sense would place the government of Libya on the same footing as the ones having been recently toppled in the region and others currently under turmoil. Libya is ruled by a set of People's Committees and the General People's Congress where policies and budgets are approved. There are no better democratic processes than this in any part of the world. What are the protests about?
One element inherent in the Libyan system is both a virtue and a draw-back. It concerns the revocation and replacements of non-performing officials at any moment. This is not to please every-one even though the masses love it. This is how a people can really exert power on those delegated to do certain duties. Many officials have been thrown out through this process. The present rebellion is an offshoot of this frustration.
Most leaders in the West know this. However there are other forces than political or humanitarian principles that are pushing some of them towards stupid postures. Obama defies his own Intelligence services to persist in advocating interventionist measures when it is becoming evident that the rebellion has no popular base and is doomed to fail. Similarly Sarkozy and Cameron are shouting for stronger actions, the former going even to the extent of recognizing the so-called National Council, mouth-piece of the rebellion. The American President has been thrashed at elections recently, Sarkozy has been out-classed on the right by Marrine Le Pen and Cameron's latest defeat at one by- election is additional proof to the fast growing unpopularity of his government.
Political leaders seem to be acting on an individual rather than collective basis, which brings us up to suspect some hidden motives behind all this fuss. The influence of the Zionist gurus and the world-wide Freemasonry network is now beyond argument. It is a certainty. Most of the westernized Arab leaders and intellectuals belong to this satanic fraternity and other sinister clans. Muslims are the first to grasp this phenomenon. It marks the advent of the "Dajjal phase" in human history.
As it was expected the pro-Ghadaffi forces are on the point of regaining control of all the regions hitherto under the rebels' siege. What will happen next? It is going to be a repetition of the same old scenario: Libya will have to negotiate and fight for the lifting of sanctions that will accumulate and many concessions will have to be made in the process. This is what occurred recently. What should Libya do?
Imagine what would happen if Ghadaffi just decided tomorrow to have a secret emergency meeting with Ahmadinejad of Iran while conceding at the same time that Al Quaeda and other Islamists groups are not entirely wrong in their assessment of some of the Western leaders. This would be welcome by the Arab masses also because nobody wants the sort of religious or sectarian conflict that are relevant questions: Why should Bahrain be allowed to call in Saudi troops to crush the local uprising while the Libyan Government is not permitted to put order in its own house by its own means? The plot is too flagrant to dissimulate. As in the case of Saddam Hussein every effort is being made to fabricate an excuse to invade Libya. If ever that happened, in addition to what is already prevailing in Irak, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon and in other parts of the planet where Muslims are being suppressed, then we will surely deduce that the ultimate war has begun. To Muslims it means the war against Dajjal!
May Allah bless our Leader Muammar Al-Khadafi & its People
May Allah send His Blessings on the Umma!
Hamza Goolbar
GENERAL Secretar
MAURITIUS-LIBYA BROTHERHOOD SOCIETY