Latest update: 29/03/2011 

- Barack Obama - Libya - Muammar Gaddafi - UK - United Nations - USA


Obama defends US military action

In a nationally televised speech aimed at lawmakers and ordinary Americans who have questioned US military involvement in Libya, US President Barack Obama defended America’s role as a world leader, but ruled out regime change by force.

By Guillaume MEYER in Washington DC (video)
News Wires (text)
 

REUTERS - President Barack Obama told Americans on Monday the United States would work with its allies to hasten the day when Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi leaves power, but would not use force to topple him.

In a nationally televised address, Obama -- accused by many lawmakers of failing to explain the U.S. role in the Western air campaign against Gaddafi's loyalists -- made the case for his decision to intervene militarily in the Libya conflict.

Syndicate contentWAR IN LIBYA

But he also underscored the limits of U.S. military action as he sought to counter criticism that he lacked clear objectives and a credible exit strategy in the conflict.

"I can report that we have stopped Gaddafi's deadly advance," Obama told military officers at the National Defense University in Washington, 10 days after ordering U.S. participation in Western-led air strikes.

"We will deny the regime arms, cut off its supply of cash, assist the opposition, and work with other nations to hasten the day when Gaddafi leaves power," Obama said.

But he added that "it may not happen overnight" and acknowledged that Gaddafi may be able to cling to power. "Broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake," he said.

Obama spoke on the eve of a 35-nation conference in London to tackle the crisis in the North African oil-exporting country and weigh political options for ending Gaddafi's 41-year rule.

"We have stopped Gaddafi's deadly advance." - US President Barack Obama

Obama's challenge was to define the limited purpose and scope of the U.S. mission in Libya for Americans preoccupied with domestic economic concerns and weary of costly wars in two other Muslim countries, Iraq and Afghanistan.

But his words may not be enough to mollify Republican opponents who say he has failed to lead in recent global crises ranging from Middle East unrest to Japan's nuclear emergency.

Obama's prime-time speech came a day after NATO agreed to assume full responsibility for military operations in Libya, ending uncertainty about who would take over the lead from U.S. forces. He said the handover would take place on Wednesday.

The alliance's decision gave a boost to Obama's effort to show Americans he was making good on his commitment to limit the U.S. military's involvement in Libya. NATO will take charge of air strikes that have targeted Gaddafi's military infrastructure as well as a no-fly zone and an arms embargo.

The White House also hopes Obama can score political points at home from gains on the battlefield by Libyan rebels emboldened by the Western air assault on Gaddafi's loyalists.

 

 

 

Comments (7)

Libya

Obama must be coherent and send marines oveer to Libya in order to attain his goal

IMPEACH

US needs to IMPEACH Obama and institute term limits on Congress.

Why didthe West abandon the Ivory Coast

When it was the Ivory Coast, the Western Powers or so called International Community did not see it fit to intervene militarily though Gbagbo forces killed and maimed women and children in that country. One can't help thinking whether the Gadafi intervention hasn't got an ulterior motive. Today, look at all the refuge crises that have been created in Libya with fellow Africans who were comfortably residing and working in Libya forced to leave and return to their countries and start all over again. Do the West really care about the protection of Arab citizens?

A piece of cake

USA has already got their shares in Irak thats why they are not virtually interested in Libya as the latter resources is the piece of cake dealt and reserved for Europe.UK Italy and France are thirsty...they are leading the war simply to get their shares in libya.

Africans leaders

For how long shall all Aricans leaders continue to squander the mandate which brought them to power.

Now for a French style

Now for a French style (including attacks on ground forces) in Syria Lebanon, Palestine, ect.

Military Action in Libya

Can two wrongs make good? Yes Gadaffi was very wrong to attack his own people but the coalition are killing more than Gaddaffi. Is this the best way of solving disputes? Does the coalition enjoy blood bath in Africa? Please sto the this war!!!

Post new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close