Latest update: 30/03/2011 

- France - Islam - Nicolas Sarkozy - secularism


French religious leaders warn against planned Islam debate

One week before a parliamentary session on secularism and the role of Islam in France, French religious leaders have written an editorial casting doubt on a debate they say could fuel prejudice.

By FRANCE 24 (text)
 

Ahead of a scheduled April 5 parliamentary session on secularism in French society, religious figures representing the six major faiths in France have co-signed a sweeping editorial denouncing the debate as a potential source of discrimination and confusion.

The initiative urged by French President Nicolas Sarkozy was originally framed, as ruling centre-right UMP party secretary Jean-François Copé stated last month, as a national conversation on “how to organise religious practice so that it is compatible in our country with the rules of our secular republics”.

But following a February TV appearance in which Sarkozy wondered aloud what kind of “limits” needed to be placed on Islam in France, the debate has been increasingly viewed as specifically targeting the roughly 6 million Muslims residing in France. Indeed, the debate is now expected to address Islam-specific issues such as the financing of mosques and the ideological backgrounds of imams leading services.

If it ain’t broke…

In the editorial published by French daily Le Parisien, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Orthodox, Muslim, and Buddhist leaders warned against “squandering the precious practice” of laïcité, France’s particularly unflinching brand of secularism enshrined in a 1905 law officially separating the Catholic Church and the state.

According to French religious historian Odon Vallet, French religious insitutions – which were in the past “hostile” toward a policy they viewed as an official refusal to recognise God’s existence – are “satisfied with the rather liberal way secularism is applied today”. But in the context of recent French laws reinforcing secularism (a ban on headscarves, Jewish kippahs, and conspicuous crosses in public schools in 2004 and a ban of the head-to-toe burqa in public just last year), their opposition to the parliamentary debate is likely motivated, in part, by “a fear of a more rigorous application of laws affecting religious garb or religious dietary restrictions”.

Sticking up for Islam, distancing themselves from the Right

Given the fact that the debate about secularism in France has largely centred around Islam, the editorial also implicitly suggests what Vallet called “a solidarity with the Muslim community of France”. The religious leaders who signed the text indeed advise “during this pre-electoral period to stay the course by avoiding lumping things together and risking stigmatisation”.

Sarkozy and far-right leader - and potential 2012 presidential rival - Marine Le Pen have recently been placing significant emphasis on issues of Islam and immigration, and the letter indicates what Vallet referred to as “a distancing of the religious leaders from these two politicians”.

Socialists have accused Sarkozy of launching a debate that amounts to a veiled crackdown on Muslims in France in a bid to win back right-wing voters who drifted to the National Front in last week’s local elections.

But even within Sarkozy’s own party, the debate has stirred controversy. Prime Minister François Fillon, considered a moderate, has questioned the wisdom of engaging in a debate that could result in the stigmatisation of French Muslims.
 

Comments (6)

Real Church leaders wanted

Our Christian leaders have betrayed us. Why are they not fighting for us? Do they love their salaries more than Christ?

Vive la laïcité!

European Union needs a secular constitution, before that it's useless to discuss with Turkey or North African countries about membership. Constitution should protect the citizens from religious oppression and not somebody's religious sentiments. Blasphemy laws must be abolished in the whole EU.

Islam debate

tize Moslems. However,Pakistan has provided a strong point to the contrary where Christians have been assassinated for daring to be Christians,but Moslems expect freedom of religion in the West

Intolerance

Lived in the middle east and europe....always the same, THEY wants us to tollerate their INTOLLERANCE.
And by the way, try to open a christ church in the middle east........sharia laws will calm you down or, depending on where you are simply get you jailed or stoned ! Poor Europe !

Islam in France

The scape-goating of national problems during economic crises on to various minority groups has been a trend oft witnessed throughout history. The version evidenced in French political rhetoric is obvious and discriminatory in nature. Major religious communities have even come out in unison critiquing this stance:

"But French Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox Christians, Jews, and Buddhists today joined Muslim leaders in published a joint statement saying the debate would cause ‘confusion in the troubled period we are going through.’" (Daily Mail quote, below also)

"The statement points to the championing of irreligious secularism by the debate’ s organisers, rather than a form of secularism embracing all religions, including Islam." -

The strange version of secularism that France seems to be advocating is a kind of militant anti-religious secularism. Which begs the question how is this a secular viewpoint? Isn't the point of real secularism not to have ANY bias towards those of religion, and those of none.

"It has already succeeded in banning the burka, and other forms of Muslim head coverings, and has stressed its opposition to worshippers praying openly on French streets." -

Why does the French state think it has the right to interfere with people's way of life? Isn't the state supposed to SERVE ALL its citizens? Why is it dictating all these laws specifically aimed to interfere with Islam? What harm does a nun do if she covers her hair or prays openly, or even a Muslim woman? It's as if the nation is to be sterilized of anything but that which the state deems appropriate, under the current state of affairs.

Debate!

Look at them, they are intolerant. Why they are afraid of debate?
Radicalism is a different version of absolute dictatorship.

Post new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close