Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

MIDDLE EAST MATTERS

Child refugees: Inside Turkey's hidden sweatshops

Read more

ENCORE!

Film show: 'The Red Turtle', 'Camping 3' and 'The Balkan Trilogy'

Read more

FACE-OFF

After Brexit, is a Frexit possible?

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Vodafone warns it could move HQ out of UK

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

French people against a 'Frexit' referendum

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Turkish Airport Blasts

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

France slammed for support of ex-Chad dictator Hissene Habre

Read more

THE DEBATE

The big breakup: The EU after Brexit

Read more

FOCUS

France struggling to recruit prison imams

Read more

Sports

Man United’s Rooney to contest two-match ban for outburst

Text by News Wires

Latest update : 2011-04-05

Wayne Rooney will contest his two-match suspension handed down by the FA Tuesday after the Manchester United striker swore into a television camera. The ban jeopordises the key player's participation in the FA Cup semifinal in two weeks.

AP - Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney on Tuesday accepted a Football Association charge after swearing into a television camera, but will challenge the severity of his two-match ban.

In United’s victory over West Ham in the Premier League on Saturday, Rooney scored a rapid-fire hat trick before swearing into the camera during the goal celebrations.

“Rooney has today admitted a charge for the use of offensive, insulting and/or abusive language,” the FA said in a statement. “However, Rooney has submitted a claim that the automatic penalty of two games is clearly excessive. A commission will hear the submission tomorrow (Wednesday).”

If Rooney’s claim fails he runs the risk of having a suspension that currently includes Saturday’s league match with Fulham and the following week’s FA Cup semifinal with Manchester City extended.

Gordon Taylor, who is chief executive of the players’ union, has questioned the FA’s decision to charge Rooney.

“Whilst the use of foul and abusive language is not condoned, there is an acceptance by all parties within the game that ‘industrial language’ is commonly used,” Taylor said. “It becomes an issue when directed towards match officials. However, when used in a spontaneous way in celebration or frustration then it is not normally expected to merit a sanction.

“If sanctions are to be imposed in such circumstances then this has to be done in a balanced and consistent manner, and participants made aware of this fundamental change in approach.”

The charge was described on the Professional Footballers’ Association website as being “unprecedented” and - if upheld - would set a “dangerous precedent” leading to a greater number of players being dismissed.

Date created : 2011-04-05

COMMENT(S)