Open

Coming up

Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

IN THE PAPERS

France concerned about anti-Semitism

Read more

WEB NEWS

Online movement demands peace in Gaza

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Apple aims to satisfy China's hunger for smartphones

Read more

DEBATE

MH17: Punishing Putin? (part two)

Read more

DEBATE

MH17: Punishing Putin?

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Competing narratives in Malaysia Airlines disaster coverage

Read more

AFRICA NEWS

Kenya : Police arrest 8 over Mombasa rampage

Read more

FOCUS

Overfishing and the global appetite for bluefin tuna: can Tokyo turn the tide?

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Too many graphic images from Gaza ?

Read more

  • Video: Fear, death and mourning in Gaza’s Khan Younis

    Read more

  • Kerry arrives in Israel to push for Gaza ceasefire

    Read more

  • Defying UK, France to proceed with warships sale to Russia

    Read more

  • Netherlands to honour MH17 victims in national day of mourning

    Read more

  • US courts issue conflicting reports on Obamacare

    Read more

  • Video: Lebanon fears fallout from regional turmoil

    Read more

  • Widodo wins Indonesian presidential election

    Read more

  • Flight MH17 shot down ‘by mistake', US intelligence indicates

    Read more

  • US, European airlines suspend flights to Tel Aviv

    Read more

  • Australian veteran Rogers claims 16th stage of Tour de France

    Read more

  • France gives go-ahead to pro-Palestinian Paris rally

    Read more

  • French Jews mourn French-Israeli soldier killed in Gaza

    Read more

  • PSG punished by UEFA for abuse of disabled Chelsea fans

    Read more

  • Colombia's Rodriguez signs '€80m' contract with Real Madrid

    Read more

  • Children killed in minibus crash in eastern France

    Read more

Asia-pacific

'Fukushima is no Chernobyl, but TEPCO faces long battle'

Text by Sophie PILGRIM

Latest update : 2011-04-13

Japan has upgraded its nuclear crisis at Fukushima to the same level as the Chernobyl meltdown 25 years ago. Donald Olander, a nuclear engineering professor at Berkeley, tells us that “Fukushima is no Chernobyl, but has the potential to become one”.

The Japanese authorities upgraded the Fukushima nuclear emergency sparked by last month's earthquake and tsunami to a maximum 7 Monday. The new rating puts it on a par with the deadly meltdown at the former Soviet Union plant in Chernobyl in 1986, in which thousands are believed to have died as a result of leaked radiation.

As defined by the UN's International Nuclear Events Scale, a level 7 accident involves "the major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects, requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures."
 
Donald Olander, professor emeritus of nuclear engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, talked to FRANCE 24 about the new rating.
 
F24: How can we compare Fukushima with Chernobyl?
 
Donald Olander: There’s a big difference between Fukushima and Chernobyl. I don’t know why [the level at Fukushima] was raised to a “7” because I doubt the amount of radiation released at Fukushima is even 10% of what was released at Chernobyl.
 
This level 7 is really just based on potential – that if something really goes very wrong at Fukushima and they can’t control those damaged reactors, then it would turn into a Chernobyl. But we’re not there yet, by a long shot.
 
It would seem reasonable to place Fukushima between Three Mile Island [a partial core meltdown at a plant in Pennsylvania in 1979, which was rated level 5] and Chernobyl.
 
Click to enlarge.
F24: Will the Fukushima area turn into a ghost town like Chernobyl?
 
DO: It’s not going to be a ghost area. The main concerns are drinking the milk from the cows in that area, because they eat the grass where radiation is deposited, or eating leafy vegetables, like spinach and lettuce. The radiation is just on the top of the soil, so as long as the water supply is underground and there hasn’t been extensive leakage into it – which can be checked periodically – then that won’t be affected.  
 
The worst is the iodine, because it’s very volatile. But that decays away in eight days, so that’s not a hazard that can’t be waited out. Caesium, on the other hand, takes 30 years, so the amount of caesium included in the radioactive leaks will determine how long the locals have to stay away from dairy production and vegetable farming.
 
F24: How long will it take for TEPCO to make the plant safe?
 
DO: If they get the cooling system running again, and take care of the water that gets contaminated [via that process], then there’s no limit to how long TEPCO can hold this plant.
 
If we look at Three Mile Island, the fuel was cleared after about 24 years. So we’re not looking at weeks, or months, because the decay of this radioactivity is very slow.
TEPCO is going to be looking after this plant for a long time. 

 

Date created : 2011-04-13

  • AUTO INDUSTRY

    Toyota announces temporary halts at European plants

    Read more

  • JAPAN

    Japan hit by quake on one-month anniversary

    Read more

  • JAPAN

    One month on, Japan remembers quake victims

    Read more

COMMENT(S)