Latest update: 06/06/2011 

- Dominique Strauss-Kahn - France - French politics - USA


Strauss-Kahn to plead 'not guilty', setting stage for trial

Former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn is expected to plead not guilty to charges of sexual assault and attempted rape when he appears in a US court on Monday. The move would indicate he is hoping for acquittal by a jury.

By Kethevane GORJESTANI (video)
FRANCE 24 (text)
 

Follow FRANCE 24's special coverage beginning at 3pm Paris time (GMT+2).

In the anxiously anticipated next step of a saga that has gripped the international political world, French politician and former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn will appear in court Monday to officially respond to charges of sexual assault and attempted rape of a New York hotel maid.

As at the previous hearing, scores of journalists and photographers will swarm the street outside the lower Manhattan court house, waiting for a peek at the man whose fall from grace has made for splashy, sordid front-page news over the last few weeks.

Strauss-Kahn is expected to plead not guilty at the arraignment, which will likely be brief.

The not-guilty plea would indicate that Strauss-Kahn and his legal team are hoping for an acquittal by the jury.

If he pleads guilty, no trial will take place and the defence might obtain a less severe sentence for Strauss-Kahn.

The case, which resulted in the IMF losing a leader and France’s Socialists losing a potentially strong presidential candidate, has also fascinated the French press and public as they watch one of their own subjected to the US legal system.

Defence may claim ‘consensual’ encounter, question accuser’s credibility

Following Strauss-Kahn’s plea on Monday, a trial could begin within a few months to a year. The prosecution will then present evidence and witnesses in front of a 12-person jury, who will then listen to the defence’s arguments to refute the prosecution’s claims.

The prosecution has said that the accuser, a 32-year-old woman from Guinea, told investigators a “compelling and unwavering story” supported by forensic evidence. That evidence is thought to be traces of Strauss-Kahn’s DNA that were reportedly found on the maid’s work uniform and are, according to prosecutors, consistent with the accuser’s account of forced oral sex.

Meanwhile, Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers are expected to argue that such evidence does not indicate a “forcible encounter”, and that in fact, the sexual encounter between Strauss-Kahn and the maid was consensual.

Strauss-Kahn’s legal team has also hinted at what may become one of their primary lines of defence: that the accuser cannot be trusted. They recently stated that they held “substantial information that, in our view, would seriously undermine the quality of this prosecution and also gravely undermine the credibility of the complainant".

New York law prohibits lawyers from exposing a possible rape victim’s sexual history, but Strauss-Kahn’s team will likely take an extensive look at the accuser’s background and may try to prove that she has a history of lying.

Strauss-Kahn himself is not obligated to testify.

After hearing both sides, the jury will be asked to reach a unanimous verdict.

If the verdict is guilty, the court must decide on the prison term. In the meantime, new witnesses can be introduced by both prosecution and defence in an effort to shorten or increase the sentence.

If convicted, Strauss-Kahn would be given a sentence for each charge – which, in theory, could result in 74 years of prison time. But legal experts have said that a more likely scenario is that Strauss-Kahn, if found guilty, would have to serve concurrent sentences (in which the time in prison equals the length of the longest sentence) rather than consecutive sentences, which are often usually ordered for more severe crimes.

If for whatever reason the accuser chooses to withdraw her charges, the prosecutors may still pursue the trial with the evidence and witnesses they have gathered, since they still have the essential element: the accuser’s initial account of being assaulted by Strauss-Kahn.

On the other hand, New York law prohibits the defence team from resolving the case through a financial settlement with the victim.

 

Read more
React to the article
Comment this article typing your message in the above text zone. Please note that this is limited to 1500 characters or less.
(5) Reactions

if hes guilty

they will find out if he is guilty they have the best methods

Strauss-Kahn

Annette W: You are joking, right? So American in France should not be subject to French law. That is an interesting concept.

The French People

Sorry Annette W, but the French are an uncivilised race of thugs, as proven when Mitterand ordered the destruction of a boat in Auckland Harbour with the collateral murder of a crew member, followed by a sordid episode of lying and cheating to recover their murderers, one of whom is Segolene Royale's brother. DSK is continuing sublimely to substantiate my proposition.

..it all sounds very

..it all sounds very civilized. Quite at odds with the usual gutter press sensationalism and character asassination

The United States is

The United States is completely appalling in their treatment of foreign dignitaries. Any matter involving DSK should have been brought to the attention of his home country. America has irreparably damaged their relationship with the international community through their actions with Mr.Strauss-Kahn.
Since when is the shallow allegation of a nameless, faceless woman taken as truth over the witness of a successful economist and head of the International Monetary Fund? The disgusting mean spiritedness of humanity has roared its ugly head and sees no interest in the containment of its hatred.

Close