Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

MEDIAWATCH

Online reactions to Kurdish referendum

Read more

THE DEBATE

Iraq's Kurds: Will referendum really lead to independence?

Read more

TALKING EUROPE

Catalonia independence vote: Tensions rise between Barcelona and Madrid

Read more

TALKING EUROPE

Catalonia’s regional foreign affairs chief: ‘This referendum is not illegal’

Read more

ENCORE!

Music show: Lucy Rose live, Ibeyi and Miley Cyrus

Read more

FOCUS

Judicial reforms: Polish government on collision course with EU

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Euro, stocks slide on Merkel's lacklustre election win

Read more

#THE 51%

Hola 'Ellas Hoy' - The 51 Percent welcomes its sister show on FRANCE 24 Spanish

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Donald Trump Vs NFL: America's divider in chief or America's saviour?

Read more

Africa

NATO seeks to silence Libyan state TV

Text by News Wires

Latest update : 2011-07-30

NATO said its warplanes bombed three Libyan satellite dishes overnight to prevent Colonel Muammar Gaddafi from using television as a propaganda tool. But state TV was still broadcast in Tripoli as of Saturday morning.

REUTERS - NATO said on Saturday it had bombed three satellite dishes in Tripoli to stop “terror broadcasts” by Muammar Gaddafi, but Libyan state TV remained on air and condemned what it said was the targeting of journalists.

NATO has been bombing Libyan targets since March, when it intervened under a U.N. mandate to protect civilians from Gaddafi’s forces as he fights an uprising against his 41-year rule.

In a video statement titled “NATO silences Gaddafi’s terror broadcasts”, NATO spokesman Colonel Roland Lavoie said NATO had disabled the ground-based satellites in a precision airstrike.

Libyan state television continued to broadcast, however, and early on Saturday was showing a repeat of a political talk show from the previous evening.

The Libyan Broadcasting Corporation issued a statement saying three employees were killed and 15 wounded in the strike.

“We are not a military target, we are not commanders in the army and we do not pose a threat to civilians,” said Khalid Bazelya, an LBC official, reading the statement to reporters.

“We are performing our job as journalists representing what we wholeheartedly believe is the reality of NATO aggression and the violence in Libya,” he said.

“The fact that we work for the Libyan government or represent anti-NATO, anti-armed gangs views does not make us a legitimate target for NATO rockets.”

Lavoie expressed scepticism about the casualty report.

“At this stage we have no evidence whatsoever to suggest there is any foundation to these allegations,” he said, adding that the strikes had been carried out in the middle of the night to avoid casualties.

He said the bombing of the satellite dishes was in line with NATO’s mission.

“Our intervention was necessary as TV was being used as an integral component of the regime apparatus designed to systematically oppress and threaten civilians and to incite attacks against them,” the NATO spokesman said.

Link with Younes killing?

One analyst suggested a link between the bombing of Libyan TV equipment and the killing on Friday of rebel military chief Abdel Fattah Younes, apparently by his own side.

“It’s absolutely plausible that what NATO is concerned about is the dissemination of propaganda exploiting Younes’s death, particularly now that there’s more information suggesting it was an Islamist-orientated group that committed the killing,” said Shashank Joshi, of London’s Royal United Services Institute.

“This chimes perfectly with claims made by the regime that al Qaeda is behind the rebellion and the TNC (rebel Transitional National Council) is a front for radical extremists.

“It may also have something to do with efforts to shake the regime’s grip on Tripoli by cutting off information. And there could also be an element of desperation on the part of NATO—a sort of kitchen-sink approach to find new forms of leverage.”

Joshi noted that NATO had bombed Serbian television during the Kosovo conflict in 1999. “So attacking television stations is something NATO has done in the past and it’s part of its repertoire of coercive tools.”

Libyan state television broadcasts endless footage of state rallies and tribal meetings in support of Gaddafi.

Talk shows feature hosts and guests condemning NATO airstrikes and discussing hardships imposed on Libyans by the bombing campaign. It shows little information about the rebels, whom it calls armed gangs or agents of Islamist extremism.

Several explosions had rocked Tripoli late on Friday evening and state television said then that airstrikes had hit civilian targets, though this was impossible to verify.

Lavoie said NATO had acted after careful planning to minimise the risk of casualties or long-term damage to television transmission capabilities, and was now in the process of assessing the effect of the strike.

“Striking specifically these critical satellite dishes will reduce the regime’s ability to oppress civilians while at the same time preserving television broadcast infrastructure that will be needed after the conflict,” he said.

Leading NATO members including the United States, Britain and France have demanded that Gaddafi leave power and recognised the rebels as the legitimate representatives of the Libyan people.
 

Date created : 2011-07-30

  • LIBYA

    Mystery surrounds death of Libyan rebel commander

    Read more

  • LIBYA

    Rebel offensive secures major supply route in west

    Read more

  • LIBYA

    As NATO faces 'stalemate', how can Libya conflict end?

    Read more

COMMENT(S)