Latest update: 25/08/2011 

- Dominique Strauss-Kahn - French politics - international justice - USA


After Strauss-Kahn dismissal, French and US press reflect – and point fingers

After Strauss-Kahn dismissal, French and US press reflect – and point fingers

The day after charges against former IMF chief and French presidential hopeful Dominique Strauss-Kahn were dropped, newspaper editorialists on both sides of the Atlantic were left to digest, assess, speculate, and assign blame.

By FRANCE 24 (text)
 

The dismissal of sexual assault charges against former IMF chief and French presidential hopeful Dominique Strauss-Kahn on Tuesday concluded a saga that made for splashy front-page news headlines over the past three months.

On Wednesday, editorialists on both sides of the Atlantic were left to digest it all, offering final musings, criticisms, and lessons to be given and gleaned from a case that dashed the reputation of one of France’s brightest political stars and brought old trans-Atlantic rivalries back to the surface.

The French press, which had initially reeled at seeing one of their political elite paraded in handcuffs before flashing cameras and jeering crowds, struck a cautious, occasionally scolding tone in assessing Strauss-Kahn. Centrist daily Le Monde noted that though “the media frenzy undeniably played a major role in Strauss-Kahn’s fall… he is, above all, a victim of his own recklessness”.

The Dernières Nouvelles d'Alsace, a regional daily in the eastern Alsace region, came down even harder on Strauss-Kahn supporters who reacted to the dismissal of charges with relief and joy. “It is deeply shocking to hear people talk as if the New York case boiled down to an odious plot and a media lynching,” read the editorial. “The real indecency is wanting to make [Strauss-Kahn] appear whiter than white.”

‘The new pebble in the shoe of Socialists’

Right-leaning daily Le Figaro also emphasised how low Strauss-Kahn has been brought by the case. “Far from being cleared, DSK will now have to face another punishment, the suspicious glare of public opinion,” wrote Yves Thréard, a political blogger for the newspaper’s website. “Allusions to his return to French politics seem totally off-subject.”

For several editorialists in the French regional press, a hypothetical return to politics for Strauss-Kahn would, if anything, be bad news for Socialists hoping to unseat centre-right President Nicolas Sarkozy in the 2012 presidential election. “The return of DSK will disrupt the Socialist Party’s message”, wrote Patrice Chabanet in north-eastern newspaper Journal de la Haute-Marne. Midi Libre, a daily in the southern city of Montpellier, similarly qualified Sarkozy as “the new pebble in the shoe of Socialists”.

But other French editorialists continued to point to what they consider flaws in the US handling of the case. According to daily Catholic publication La Croix, one of the major “losers” in the case was “the image of justice”. A similar point was made by Dominique Garraud, writing for south-western newspaper Charente Libre. “Nothing can ever erase the image of DSK handcuffed, unshaven, looking defeated, accused of a sordid sexual crime,” he wrote. “He’s judicially cleared, but he comes out of this ordeal politically obliterated.”

Left-wing daily Libération singled out a potentially constructive effect of the case, as it “allowed us to shine a harsher light on the reality -- up until now mostly hidden -- of the imbalance in power between the sexes in politics, and in the bedroom, as well”.

‘France in its dominating arrogance’ or ‘America looking for scapegoats’?

Indeed, the Strauss-Kahn case resulted in a fair amount of French soul-searching regarding gender inequality and treatment of women in both professional and private spheres in France. That continued Wednesday, with French feminist Florence Montreynaud penning a fiery editorial in Le Monde. “Strauss-Kahn incarnated France in its dominating arrogance,” Montreynaud wrote. “But with the emperor having lost his clothes, the so-called seduction ‘à la française’ will now be seen for what it is: sexual violence.”

The idea that Strauss-Kahn represents a larger French problem is not shared by all commentators in France. Also in Le Monde Wednesday was an equally fiery opinion piece by writer Pascal Bruckner, who argued, to the contrary, that US puritanism and anti-French sentiment were responsible for much of the damage done in the Strauss-Kahn case. “Punishing France for Iraq, for Roman Polanski, for its laws on the headscarf and niqab, putting rebellious France, stubbornly attached to its loose values, in its place -- that is what the Strauss-Kahn case is ultimately about at a moment when America is biting the dust and looking for scapegoats,” Bruckner wrote.

Strauss-Kahn's nightmare 'not over'

Reactions in the US were somewhat more subdued, with The New York Times noting that the decision to dismiss charges was a wise one, considering that it would be legally and ethically wrong of the prosecutors to ask a jury to trust an accuser that they no longer trusted themselves.

The Oregonian, the biggest daily newspaper in the north-western city of Portland, similarly defended the decision, stating that “this is the rare celebrity case where the American justice system owes no apologies” and that accuser “Diallo let [prosecutors] down”.

But pointed criticism of the judicial handling of the case could be found in The Star Ledger, the largest newspaper in New Jersey (a state that neighbours New York); the paper’s editorial board slammed chief prosecutor Cyrus Vance for having “paraded his big catch before the media and wildly overstated the evidence against him”.

Still, the paper reserved its harshest words for Strauss-Kahn himself. “It is grating to watch him go free when there is a good possibility he is guilty of sexual assault. And it was annoying to hear him whine about what a ‘nightmare’ this ordeal has been for him and his family,” the editorial read. “But if it’s any comfort, his pathway to the French presidency is likely blocked now, he lost his job as head of the International Monetary Fund, and he still faces a rape charge in France. His nightmare is not over.”

 

Comments (13)

What Carrie said is still

What Carrie said is still true among the Texas Tea Party types, but Gallup puts Americans' favorability rating of France at over 70% last year, which (I'm going out on a limb here) is probably higher than France's favorability rating of the US.

After Strauss-Kahn dismissal, French and US press reflect – and

What I find missing in this exercise of reflection, is a close scrutiny of the 'American Criminal Justice System' and the role of the media tha contributed to the ultimate debacle of the 'Legal' case. From the outset, the media's approach and focus has been the "legal" aspects of the sexual encounter. It is totally absurd or at worst hypocritical to argue that the sexual encouter was amicable between the two persons involved.Hence, it was an offensive act upon the lady.

Between innocent until proven guilty and money talk...

It's not so typical court case settlement that we've seen in US. The outcome is often characterized between travesty or kagaroo court,,,The most tragic about all these bargaining justices is that the settlement handsome reward is too often ended up in the unlikely hands such as the fortune hunting lawyers and editorial sensationslist writers.

Remember O.J Simpson!

DSK Dare I ask?

Dare I ask what the outcome would have been if the woman concerned had not lied about her immigration status and what ever else she was supposed to have done many years ago, what would the outcome have been against DSK. The evidence of something sordid was compelling, his actions immediately after the encounter were to say the least 'very out of caracter' for an innocent man. Do I smell something fishy hmmm we will never know - not on this occasion anyway. However the dye is cast, the smear, stain or inferance is there to stay. The future, well, we will just have to wait and see what develops.

Odd --- Very Odd

It is likely, beyond the media attention and hype, publicly revealed evidence may show that this was nothing more than a scam of opportunity emanating from an episode of consensual sex gone bad. I still find it hard to believe that Ms. Diallo (or any other hotel staff) would be totally unaware that DSK was a high profile guest under their care prior to this alleged incident.

Furthermore, with a pattern of lies and inconsistencies (before and during the alleged crime) discovered by the same New York City prosecutors defending her, the so-called victim jeopardized her own credibility beyond DSK's own history of sexually related accusations. Surely, this history would make DSK an easy high value target.

Increasingly, many New Yorkers are now feeling this all actually boils down to a consensual sexual encounter that went bad or was rougher than expected, and a window of opportunity was opened to benefit from it financially. Again, is it plausible that Ms. Diallo was never informed about the high profile status of her employer's guest prior to entering his room?

Ask yourself, where does a hotel maid get money to pay for high caliber expensive lawyers and security personnel to conduct her public campaign to project herself as a helpless and totally innocent victim against an internationally ranked public official with far more to lose --- an official who just happens to casually leave the hotel to catch a previously scheduled flight to France --- whose greatest concern at the airport was contacting the hotel staff for the cell phone he forgot.

Hypothetically, if Ms. Diallo was sodomized during consensual sex, does that mean in the end she is the only victim? Why would DSK, or any person, pay nearly $7 million dollars (so far) for lawyers, bail, electronically monitored house arrest, and personal security if prosecutors and a jury could most likely find him guilty? Wouldn't an out-of-court settlment be less expensive?

Moreover, why would an alleged victim orchestrate through media savvy lawyers and engage in a publicity campaign when it's their reputation, identity and privacy they wanted to protect from the beginning? Odd --- very odd!

Skeleton in the closet of Nafissatou Diallo haunted her back!!!

Everyone were not perfect, everyone commits mistake. Everyone sided with the guinean maid since at the start, infact the DA, as well as the policemen in NY responded with Nafissatou Diallo and so with the parading media, and even put DSK to ryker island, in just a snap of the finger and when her skeleton in the closet of this guinean maid haunted her back,, and it made a whirlwind twist by the prosecutors. They just done the right thing. She was never been abandoned, infact she was been favored at the very beginning!. The truth and the proof of evidence sets "DSK"free! The great lesson for this case is"HONESTY"

Strauss _Khan

A technicality the privileged use ,you dont think it is that easy to prosecute the privileged ,You are living in cuckoo land , the Lady carrying the Scale of Balance has her eyes blindfolded,She does not want to see the crap carrying on in the wheels of Justice.

Mission Accomplished

The task was to remove Strauss-Khan from the IMF and replace him with someone more puppetty for America. Enter Lagarde. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

I understand completely how

I understand completely how the French feel when it comes to how America treated this whole affair. America seems to take great pleasure in mocking anything that has to do with France, when America forgets that France helped them win the Revolutionary War against colonial England, and thus were able to become an independent country and that the Statue Of Liberty was given to America by France as well. I still don't undertsand why America is so anti-French and I probably won't ever be able to fully know as America doesn't seem to want to explain itself in the sense that they would have to admit that they are wrong or ignorant about something. I, myself, have had to be a closeted francophile for many years as those who are seen as being empathetic to anything related to France are often met with ridicule and hostility in America. Perhaps one day America will see its ignorance and become accpeting of France and its history, culture, and attitudes; however, I don't see that see happening for quite some time unfortunately.

DSK

Bruckner is right. And one should be reminded that in the USA money is the key to Justice, where she holds out her hand before deciding guilty or not guilty!

STRAUS KHAN RAPE CASE DISMISSAL

Can I conclude that the Judge and the Lawyers are saying that - HE (STRAUS KHAN) DID IT, BUT HE DID IT TO A LYING WOMAN, THEREFORE HE IS NOT GUILTY - so he can go free?

Dirty old man!

Whatever the outcome, the disgusting old man still had sex with a common cleaner - with or without consent. His semen was found on her uniform.
He has only himself to blame - he belongs in the gutter.

JUSTICE

How much did it cost him?

Post new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close