Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

ENCORE!

Photographer Clare Strand explores the causes and consequences of communication breakdown

Read more

IN THE PRESS

Fashion and ethics: Five years after Bangladesh factory collapse, what's changed?

Read more

FOCUS

Israel’s migrant crisis: Clear government signals, but unclear decisions

Read more

PERSPECTIVE

Plastic waste: ‘We can only tackle the problem if we work together’

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

Louis XIV's message for the British royal baby

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

Zimbabwean nurses call off strike and return to work

Read more

THE DEBATE

Macron meets Trump: A state visit with discord on the horizon?

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Macron hopes for breakthrough on trade tensions during US visit

Read more

ENCORE!

Music show: Mahalia, Ariana Grande & Willie Nelson

Read more

Europe

WikiLeaks’ Assange loses extradition appeal

Text by News Wires

Latest update : 2011-11-21

London’s High Court on Wednesday ruled that WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange (pictured) can be extradited to Sweden, where he is wanted for questioning over alleged rape and sexual assault.

AP - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday lost his appeal against extradition to Sweden to answer sex crime allegations after judges rejected claims that moves to return him to Scandinavia were unfair and unlawful.

Judges John Thomas and Duncan Ousely said Assange should be sent to be questioned over the alleged rape of one woman and the molestation of another in Stockholm last year.

The 40-year-old has denied wrongdoing, and insists the case is politically motivated by those opposed to the work of his secret-spilling organization.

Wearing a gray suit, Assange flipped through piles of documents and shook hands with supporters as he appeared in court to hear the verdict.

It was not immediately clear whether Assange, who has spent much of the past year under virtual house arrest at a supporter’s country estate, will now have the right to take his case to Britain’s Supreme Court.

In their ruling, the appeal judges said the decision by Swedish authorities to issue a European Arrest Warrant could not “be said to be disproportionate.”

“In any event, this is self evidently not a case relating to a trivial offense, but to serious sexual offenses,” the judges said.

Before the judgment, extradition lawyer Julian Knowles had said Assange would only be able to appeal to Britain’s Supreme Court - the country’s highest court - if the appeals court’s ruling involved an issue of “real legal significance.”

Knowles said that if Assange is permitted a further appeal, he would likely stay on bail for a couple of months. If not, “he’ll be extradited within 10 days,” he predicted.

Assange had claimed in his appeal that the alleged offenses would not have been regarded as crimes under English and Welsh law, a stance the judges rejected.

“There can be no doubt that if what Mr. Assange had done had been done in England and Wales, he would have been charged,” the ruling said.
 

Date created : 2011-11-02

  • UNITED KINGDOM

    British court defers Assange extradition decision

    Read more

  • UNITED KINGDOM

    Assange in court for extradition appeal

    Read more

  • UNITED KINGDOM

    WikiLeaks founder Assange risks 'denial of justice'

    Read more

COMMENT(S)