Latest update: 29/11/2011 

- air strikes - NATO - Pakistan - USA


Deadly NATO air strikes in Pakistan ‘lasted over an hour’

The NATO air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers lasted over an hour and continued even after Pakistani commanders had asked coalition forces to stop, Pakistan army spokesperson Athar Abbas told FRANCE 24 in an interview Monday.

By FRANCE 24 (with wires) (text)
 

Major General Athar Abbas described the NATO air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers near the border with Afghanistan on Saturday as “lasting for over an hour” in an interview with FRANCE 24 on Monday. The military spokesman added that commanders called for a ceasefire from NATO but their calls went unheard.

While NATO has described the incident as "tragic and unintended", the length of the attack has further inflamed anti-US anger in Pakistan. Before the deadly attack, ties between the two countries were already deteriorating and have sunk to new lows since.

The poorly defined, mountainous border between Pakistan and Afghanistan has been a constant source of tension between Pakistan and the United States.

According to news wires, unnamed Afghan officials have said that Afghan commandos and US special forces were conducting a mission on the Afghan side of the border on November 26 and received incoming fire from the direction of the Pakistani posts, provoking them to respond with air strikes.

“We communicated (…) that the posts in such-and-such a location are under heavy fire and the fire should be ceased immediately,” explained Abbas. “[But] the firing went on for over an hour.” NATO has promised a full investigation into the incident.

End of co-operation?

Abbas said that while “there is a great stress on the relationship,” he did not believe the incident will lead to a complete breakdown in relations. “It will be the decision of the leadership whether to stop co-operating with NATO. But I don’t think so because we believe that there is a common threat of terrorism and we are both fighting to eliminate the terrorists in that area.” He argued instead that “the terms of the co-operation should be drawn up so that each side knows what the limits are”.

Saturday's strikes have added to popular anger in Pakistan against the US-led coalition presence in Afghanistan. Many in the army, parliament, general population and media already believed that the US and NATO were hostile to Pakistan.

“There is a great sense of resentment and anger,” Abbas said during his interview in Paris. “More so because in this area the Pakistani army conducted operations in the past, cleared the area of the militants with great effort, and sacrificed over 70 officers and soldiers in this fight.”

While the United States is unpopular in Pakistan, the army has accepted billions in American aid over the last 10 years in return for its co-operation in fighting al-Qaeda. “We perhaps may have a different direction or a different methodology, because we are fighting in our own country against our own people,” Abbas said.

Hours after the attack on Saturday, Pakistan closed its western border to trucks delivering supplies to NATO troops in Afghanistan and demanded that the US abandon an air base in Pakistan used to operate drone strikes.

Comments (5)

coward air strikes in Pakistan by NATO

It seems that America and her alliess forget the history of the world that every indivisuals or a nation pay price of each n every bad deed which anyone does. The western society claim that it has the faith,it believes in God or the heaven or hell or the day of justice after death.It all tell a lie, The western just wanna live on wealth of others nations and their bloodsheds in the name of socalled civilization

LIES. WHAT ELSE?

THERE NOT POORLY DEFINED BOARDERS, HAHHAHA BORDERS ARE MARKED ON GPS. HAHHAHAH ARE YOU KIDDING ME. DO YOU THINK THEY FIND THEIR WAY WITH A FLASHLIGHT AND COMPASS UP IN THE HELICOPTER. GOOD GRIEF. THEY WERE 90 MILES INSIDE PAK. NOT ON BORDER...LIARS.

Different direction?

If it lasted an hour, the Pakistanis obviously kept firing at NATO. It's only when they die do we hear about the back-stabbers firing at us.
They have been anti-USA going way back, especially when hiding Bin Laden - the number one reason we went to war.

Buffer Zone

This is exactly why there must always be a 5Km buffer zone along international borders. Yes, we cede a 5Km zone to the bad-guys as a sanctuary but it prevents this kind of Blue (friendly) versus Green (ally) fratricide!!! One also is lead to believe there was no senior command post hot-line to avert or de-conflict this type of issue. Piss poor planning & policy by senior commanders.

NATO

Funny! When the effluent hits the fan, it's a NATO air strike. When it's a positive venture, it's a "U.S. lead Coalition"! Can't imagine bombing the country who is allowing our supply lines to Aghanistan to function! Who is in charge anyway?

Post new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close