Latest update: 05/02/2012 

- Bashar al-Assad - diplomacy - Popular revolt - Russia - Syria - UN Security Council - unrest


Anger as Russia, China veto UN draft resolution on Syria

Russia and China vetoed a draft UN resolution backing an Arab League call for Syria's Bashar al-Assad to step down on Saturday, prompting anger from the United States and France. The US ambassador said she was “disgusted” by the move.

By News Wires (text)
 

AP - Russia and China on Saturday vetoed a Security Council resolution backing an Arab League peace plan that calls for Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down amid escalating violence.

The other 13 members of the council, including the United States, Britain and France, voted in an unusual weekend session favor of the resolution aimed at stopping the ongoing violence in Syria.

Syndicate contentUN members react to the veto

The rare double-veto was issued following days of negotiations aimed at overcoming Russian opposition to the draft resolution. Several European envoys said before the session that they felt compelled to call for the vote despite Russia’s attempts to seek a delay because of the escalating violent crackdown by Assad’s regime.

The urgency was heightened by an assault by Syrian forces firing mortars and artillerey on the city of Homs. Activists said more than 200 people were killed in what they called one of the bloodiest episodes of the uprising against Assad. The U.N. says more than 5,400 people have been killed over almost 11 months in a government crackdown on civilian protests.

“It is a sad day for this council, a sad day for Syrians and a sad day for all friends of democracy,” French Ambassador Gerard Araud said after the resolution was vetoed.

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said her country was “disgusted” by the vote.

Araud said Russia and China had “made themselves complicit in a policy of repression carried out by the Assad regime.”

Local committees to call for strike and mutiny after Russian and Chinese veto resolution
By Lucy FIELDER in Beirut

Syria has been a key Russian ally since Soviet times and Moscow has opposed any U.N. call that could be interpreted as advocating military intervention or regime change. Russia and China also used their veto powers as permanent council members in October to block a previous Western attempt to condemn the violence in Syria.

“Today the Security Council has failed to live up to its responsiblty,” German Ambassador Peter Wittig said. “The people in Syria have been let down again.”

Earlier Saturday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a security conference in Munich, Germany, that Moscow still two problems of “crucial importance” with the draft council resolution on the violence in Syria.

Russia cites 'crucial' problems with UN draft

Ahead of a key vote on a UN resolution on Syrian unrest, Moscow says it remains concerned about two "crucial" problems with the draft.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Saturday that the draft text does not make enough demands on the armed militias agitating against President Bashar al-Assad's regime. Russia also opposes language expressing the Security Council's "full" support for an Arab League call for Assad to step down, saying it presupposes the outcome of any future national dialogue among Syria's political players. 

Lavrov's comments, which came on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, followed a reworking of the draft text on Thursday that was designed to avoid a threatened Russian veto.

Lavrov said the resolution makes too few demands of anti-government armed groups, and that Moscow remains concerned that it could prejudge the outcome of a national dialogue among political forces in Syria.

Lavrov was quoted by Russian news agencies as saying that he and Russia’s foreign intelligence chief, Mikhail Fradkov, will meet with Assad in Damascus on Tuesday.

Before the vote, President Barack Obama urged the council to take a stand against Assad’s regime and back the resolution.

“The international community must work to protect the Syrian people from this abhorrent brutality,” Obama said in a statement issued by the White House.

In a blistering statement, Obama said Assad had displayed “disdain for human life and dignity” following the weekend attacks in Homs.

“The Syrian regime’s policy of maintaining power by terrorizing its people only indicates its inherent weakness and inevitable collapse,” Obama said. “Assad has no right to lead Syria, and has lost all legitimacy with his people and the international community.”

To the Syrian people, Obama pledged U.S. support and vowed to work with them to build a better future in their country.

French, US condemnation

French Foreign Secretary Alain Juppé has denounced "an attack against the people of Homs", calling for "urgent international action" to stop the bloodshed.

“Far from ending their politics of repression, the Syrian authorities have taken a further step towards savagery. The massacre in Homs is a crime against humanity and those responsible will have to be held to account,” said Juppé.

Friday’s shelling of the city was also described by the White House as an "unspeakable assault against the people of Homs".

US President Barack Obama told Syria's Bashar al-Assad it was time to step down after showing a "disdain for human life and dignity".

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton met Saturday with Lavrov on the sidelines of the security conference to stress that the United States strongly believes the council should vote on the resolution Saturday, a senior State Department official said.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said they had a “very vigorous discussion.”

In an interview broadcast earlier Saturday on Russian state television, Lavrov had warned that Moscow would use its veto power if several amendments it had submitted were not included in the European-Arab draft of the resolution.

“If they want another scandal at the U.N. Security Council, we wouldn’t be able to stop them,” Lavrov said, voicing hope that Washington wouldn’t put the draft to a vote without Russia’s amendments.

“The scandal is not to act. The scandal would be to fail to act,” Wittig, the German ambassador, said before Saturday’s session.

Russian news agencies quoted Lavrov upon his return to Moscow later Saturday as saying that the amendments were not “excessive” and that consensus on the resolution remained possible “if our colleagues show a constructive approach.”

But U.S. Ambassador Rice told reporters as she headed into the council session that Russia’s proposed amendments were “unacceptable.”

Foreign Minister Alain Juppe of France, a firm backer of U.N. action and also a permanent Security Council member, said the latest outbreak of violence in Syria “underlines the urgency that the U.N. Security Council must break its silence to denounce the authors of this crime.”

“The international community must recognize and support the right of the Syrian people to freedom, to security and to the choice of its political future,” Juppe said. “Those who block the adoption of such a resolution are taking a grave historical responsibility.”
 

Comments (6)

Why blame anyone but the Syrian National Council ?

This is an opposition group which has openly refused to talk to the seated government which has had the majority support in Syria for years. They will not negotiate. They have stirred up unrest and violence and leave no option but retaliation in kind. They want the rest of the world to come in and hand them the reins of government in a coup d'etat or for the current regime to completely capitulate ? In spite of this the entire western world blames Assad. It should be obvious to even the most casual observer that this is just another attempt to force regime change, most probably instigated from outside of Syria by the CIA or one of its equivalents. It was obvious to Russia and China that they had no qualms about vetoing the resolution despite the propaganda directed against them immediately.

France should lead the attack, like in libya

france has gained most respect from those countries because france was first to help them when they were in most need. it is good for france's image and influence in the long run and esp to make idle and impotent turks look like utter losers. people have gained a lot of respect for france and french people and your help will never ever be forgotten. i rather see french influence in middleast than turk or any other. go france!

CHINA VETO U.N. LETS VETO

CHINA VETO U.N. LETS VETO "MADE IN CHINA"

Susan Rice & Her Disgust

If the American ambassador to the UN Susan Rice is so " disgusted " with two prominent and important members of the Security Council ( Russia and China ),she should resign forthwith as her disgust and intemparate language will not allow her to function normally.She does not seem to be the kind of person to realise that the Security Council members are not her servants.Rice should also check her hands to see if they are dripping with the blood being shed every day in the Libya she and her dream team "liberated " months ago.

Geo-political and natural resource-rich targets of U.SGovernment

About five years before the initial U.S. led incursion into Iraq, I was informed by a U.S.Naval Intelligence officer that a plan was in the works to invade that country, depose its leader and establish control over the mineral rights to the country, deemed necessary to the security of the U.S. in order to fight a war with China some 20 years hence.Near the end of that incusion, in a conversation which I had with a Bulgarian national, he indicated that he was sure that the CIA had similar plans for both Syria and Iran. In the aftermaths of Iran Air 655 and Pan Am 103, the focus seemed (wrongly) to shift to Libya 24 years later. Now that hegemony is being established there by U.S.interests presumeably, it would seem that the question of the Soviet foreign minister is rather germane regarding the nature of "the end game".As improbable as it might seem, I do recall an Insurance Adjuster's claim of evidence of the involvement of MI-6 in the Pan Am 103 disaster. It would be useful for the purpose of correctly assessing world affairs, if governments would be more transparent regarding just what it is that their foreign policies involve.

syria

I have no personal interest in Syria, or Assad, as far as I am the place can float off to Mars, however I am with Russia and China, but not necessarily For the same reasons.

For many years, despite problems in the past, Syria has been a very placid and fairly well governed state, it has suffered none of the internal turmoil that has beleaguered most of it's neighbours, and brother Muslim dominated states. I have to accept there has been some internal pressures that may have created friction, but from personal experience, I saw most of their peoples gaining a far better lifestyle than virtually all the regions that lie adjacent or within the Islamic sphere. Possibly only Jordan can match Syria for the lifestyle.

I have to wonder why it is, that Syria has suddenly become a pariah state, subsequent to the down fall of far worse regimes across the region. Could it be due to meddling by western powers that themselves are rather rocking on their heels due to the fiscal meltdown of recent times?

Or could it?

I feel sad for those caught up in the unrest, but maybe if outside influences had not been so ready to involve themselves and stir the pot, Syria could have weathered any storm. today I am doubtful it will remain placid, and I sense all the GOOD things done under the Assad's will be ruined.

Poor Syria.

And shame on those who have helped engineer the current situation.

Post new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Related Content
Close