- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 14/02/2012
- Syria - USA
US ambassador: 'Intervention not an option in Syria'
After the United States closed its embassy in Damascus this week, the US ambassador, Robert Ford, gave his first foreign interview since leaving Syria to FRANCE 24, calling for an end to the violence and for Bashar al-Assad to step down.
By Ben MCPARTLAND (text)
In an interview with FRANCE 24, the US ambassador to Syria has defended his country’s stance towards President Bashar al-Assad and called on the Syrian leader to end his brutal crackdown.
Robert Ford was pulled out of Syria earlier this week after the US closed the embassy because of security concerns.
In his first foreign interview since leaving the country, Ford told FRANCE 24’s Arabic channel the US were still seeking a “peaceful political" solution.
Ford said military intervention was not an option and denied suggestions that his country’s refusal to step in was encouraging Assad to increase the violence.
“We are not dithering. We are not hesitating. The US position is that we reject any kind of military intervention in Syria, let's be clear about that,” Ford told FRANCE 24
“We are striving for a peaceful political solution. Even the Syrian people do not want a military solution to this crisis.
“We believe Assad should step down, but at the end of the day the Syrian people will make the decision, not the US,” he said.
Ford said the focus of efforts to bring about an end to the violence relied on the Arab League, whose UN resolution aimed at ending the violence was controversially vetoed by Russia and China on February 4.
“What is absolutely paramount is that the Arab League make a decision on what they want exactly and we are then going to see how we should deal with that decision,” he added.
'Killings need to stop'
Hundreds of civilians in the besieged city of Homs have been killed in recent days as Assad’s forces bombard suburbs with heavy artillery.
The attack has outraged the international community, and Ford echoed US President Barack Obama’s calls for Assad to end the bloodshed.
Ford said the capital Damascus was gripped with "fear" over the ongoing crisis.
“The violence should cease right away. The killings of civilians without weapons in Homs should stop right away. The shellings are horrendous," he said.
The US closed its Damascus embassy after claiming the Syrian government had not done enough to guarantee security. Ford and all American embassy employees were pulled out of the country immediately.
In July, Ford provoked anger among the leaders of Syria’s regime with his controversial visit to see protesters in the city of Hama. The opposition was boosted by his presence, but Syrian authorities claimed it showed the US was attempting to meddle in their affairs.
Ford told FRANCE 24 the Americans would support increased numbers of Arab League observers returning to Syria and said his government would be increasing sanctions against those who are "bankrolling" Assad’s crackdown.
He also vowed to find funds to help deal with humanitarian fallout from the crisis.
On Friday, Ford took to social networking site Facebook to denounce the violent and “unequal” crackdown by Bashar al-Assad.
Posting a note on the embassy’s page, Ford condemned the regime’s “use of heavy weaponry…against residential neighbourhoods in Homs” despite no evidence of opposition fighters using similar weapons.
The attack on Homs marked “a new low for the Assad regime,” Ford said, adding, “We are intent on exposing the regime's brutal tactics for the world to see.”
He also posted a satellite image on the embassy’s Facebook account claiming to show the extent of the attacks by the Syrian regime against civilians in Homs.
Related Content
Breaking news from the MIDDLE EAST


























Comments (5)
US Ambassador No intervention
When you say no to intervention and you do not do any thingelse ,you are giving Bashar the murder an execuse to massacre the syrians.What kind of human being are you.Bashar and his thugs rulling Syria will not ever accept any peacful solution ,iam fed up with the west they only talk no action .In my view you are together with the Russian Veto partners in the systematic killings.........
military intervention
Is the USA regretting the military intervention in Libya?
Syria.
Simple let the syrians have an election,if they vote somebody else in,that is the legitimate head of the country,not what the west dictates who should rule a country.Conclusion Why dont you morons in the west let the syrians decide.keep your crap analysis and news for your own subjects and not in other countries govt's etc,etc.
Syrian Crisis.
The American ambassador to Syria may not prefer military intervention in Syria.What the U.S government seems to opt for is subversion through the " Firiends of Syria " like Turkey and the Arab League countries.The Americans hoped that somebody in his inner circle would assassinate Gaddafi.They are pinning the same hope on the close associates of Bashar Assad.The United states is routinely killing suspected terrorists with its drones without any judicial process.It is now morally inured and cynical to encourage the assassination of the foreign heads of state it does not favour.It was like America trying to murder Fidel Castro in the 1960s.Now the same thing is happening in the U.S with a Nobel Peace prize winner as its president.
Intervention not an option!
I have a question for ambassador ford. What criteria was followed to determine that intervention in Libya was warranted but not Syria? Qadhafi's forces unleashed a military campaign against the rebels, (In this case, the rebels at least possessed heavy armor), but western powers immediately sought to intervene, (U.N. resolution providing license for the west to intervene, via air support). Immediately upon entry of western forces, Qadhafi's forces began to crumble and shortly thereafter, the end came. In Syria, the situation is worse, in that, there's not a well armed opposition, i.e. procurement of weaponry from outside, (In a large volume and territory not in government control) used for training of forces. In Syria's case, a civilian population (lightly armed), facing a well trained force equipped with an assortment of modern weaponry, and a government in complete control of the national territory.
Post new comment