Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

MEDIAWATCH

Dotard: an educational insult

Read more

#TECH 24

Medtech: Repairing the human body

Read more

ENCORE!

Jennifer Lawrence on why she's unafraid to speak out

Read more

#THE 51%

Hola "Ellas Hoy" - The 51 Percent welcomes its sister show on FRANCE 24 Spanish

Read more

YOU ARE HERE

A stroll through the Corsican city of Calvi, jewel of the Mediterranean

Read more

REPORTERS

The torment of Christians living in Syria’s Khabur valley

Read more

FOCUS

'Generation Merkel' yearns for continuity and stability

Read more

DOWN TO EARTH

Amazon rainforest pays heavy price for Brazil's political crisis

Read more

EYE ON AFRICA

Presidential election re-run pushed back to October 26th

Read more

Africa

UN denies peacekeepers being held hostage in Darfur

Text by News Wires

Latest update : 2012-02-20

The joint African Union-United Nations peacekeeping mission (UNAMID) on Monday refuted a Darfur rebel group's claim from earlier in the day that it had kidnapped 49 peacekeepers. UNAMID said the solders were "blocked" not kidnapped.

AFP - Fifty-five peacekeepers from the joint African Union-United Nations peacekeeping mission (UNAMID) in Sudan's Darfur region are not hostages, the mission said after rebels reported their capture.

"They are not taken hostage but they were blocked since yesterday in northwest Darfur," a UNAMID public information officer told AFP.

She said the troops are able to move but they are "working on releasing" three civilians who were with them.

The rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) said it had captured three suspected Sudanese intelligence agents along with 49 UNAMID members on Sunday.

But the UNAMID officer said the three civilians work for the peacekeeping mission, not the government.

"They are not spies," she said, declining to say what had happened to them.

Date created : 2012-02-20

  • SUDAN

    Peacekeepers warn of resurgent violence in Darfur

    Read more

  • SUDAN

    Army kills key Darfur rebel leader, state media say

    Read more

COMMENT(S)