A Norwegian judge in the trial of Anders Behring Breivik, who confessed to killing 77 people in attacks last July, has been dismissed for online comments he made in the wake of the attacks calling for the perpetrator to be given the death penalty.
AP - A lay judge in the trial of confessed mass killer Anders Behring Breivik was dismissed Tuesday for saying online that the anti-Muslim extremist deserves the death penalty for killing 77 people in a bomb-and-shooting massacre.
Lawyers on all sides requested that Thomas Indreboe be dismissed for his comments on a chat forum the day after the July 22 attacks. Breivik is being tried by a panel of two professional judges and three lay judges. The system is designed to let ordinary citizens have a role in the Norwegian justice system.
Indreboe was replaced by backup lay judge Elisabeth Wisloeff.
THE INCRIMINATING FACEBOOK COMMENTS
As at the start of the trial on Monday, Breivik entered the court smirking before flashing a clenched-fist salute. He will have five days to explain why he set off a bomb in Oslo's government district, killing eight, and then gunned down 69 at a Labor Party youth camp outside the Norwegian capital.
Survivors of the July massacre worry that he will use his testimony as a platform to promote his extremist views. The key issue for the court to decide is whether Breivik is psychotic.
Breivik claimed Monday he acted in self-defense to protect Norway from Muslims by attacking the left-leaning political party he blamed for the country's liberal immigration policies.
Confessed Norway gunman faces trial
- Anti-nuclear weapons campaign ICAN wins 2017 Nobel Peace Prize
- Ruling right-wing coalition claims Norway election victory
- European leaders warn against protectionism at G20
- Norway moves to protect 'Doomsday' seed vault from climate change
- Norwegian police defuse explosive device near Oslo metro station
- Breivik makes Nazi salute at court appearance
- Stolen gate from Nazi concentration camp found in Norway
- Brothers and sisters-in-arms
- Facebook v. Norway: Child pornography or iconic war photo?
- Norway will 'move mountains' for Nordic neighbour Finland
- Norwegian group offers lessons to migrants on how to treat women
- Afghanistan’s far-flung ‘first daughter’, artist Mariam Ghani
- 'The dress' is back but why don’t we see black and blue ?
- Norway: Utoya massacre survivors still seeking answers
- 'Why Putin did it'
- Egypt: violent clashes in Cairo
- New 'rules of behaviour' for the NSA?
- Norwegian neo-Nazi goes on race hate trial in France
- Syrian rebels call Peace Prize 'premature'
- Chemical weapons watchdog wins Nobel Peace Prize
Breivik rejected the authority of the court, calling it a vehicle of the "multiculturalist'' political parties in power in Norway. He confessed to the "acts'' but pleaded not guilty, saying he was acting in self-defense.
Even his lawyers conceded that such a defense was unlikely to succeed, and
said the main thing for them was to convince the court that Breivik is not insane.
One psychiatric examination found him legally insane while another reached the opposite conclusion. It is up to the panel to decide whether to send him to prison or compulsory psychiatric care.
Breivik could face a maximum 21-year prison sentence or an alternate custody arrangement that would keep him locked up as long as he is considered a menace to society.
Date created : 2012-04-17