- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 05/07/2012
- AF 447 crash - Air France - Brazil - France - plane crash
Rio-Paris Air France crash report calls for tougher rules and training
The final report released Thursday on the causes of the crash of Air France flight 447, which claimed the lives of 228 people travelling from Rio to Paris in 2009, recommends tougher training and certification to avoid repeat disasters.
By News Wires (text)
AP - French air accident investigators say a combination of mistakes by inadequately trained pilots and faulty equipment caused an Air France jet to plunge into the Atlantic in 2009, killing all 228 people aboard.
The BEA air accident investigation agency is recommending better training for pilots and stricter plane certification rules as a result of its three-year probe into the crash of Flight 447.
The report lists a combination of “human and technical factors” behind the crash. The plane flying from Rio de Janeiro to Paris crashed into the sea during a nighttime thunderstorm in Air France’s deadliest ever accident.
In one fatal decision, the report says, one of the co-pilots in the cockpit at the time nosed the Airbus A330 upward during a stall – instead of downward, as he should have – because of false data from sensors about the plane’s position.
Chief investigator Alain Bouillard said the two pilots at the controls never understood that the plane was in a stall. He said only a well-experienced crew with a clear understanding of the situation could have stabilized the plane in those conditions.
“In this case, the crew was in a state of near-total loss of control,” he said.
Robert Soulas, who lost his daughter and son-in-law in the crash, says investigators said the flight director system indicated the “erroneous information” that the plane was diving downward, “and therefore to compensate, the pilot had a tendency to pull on the throttle to make it rise up.”
However, the plane was in a stall instead. A basic maneuver for stall recovery, which pilots are taught at the outset of their flight training, is to push the yoke forward and apply full throttle to lower the nose of the plane and build up speed. But because the pilot thought the plane was diving, he nosed up.
The family members showed sympathy toward the pilots, saying they were dealing with bad equipment in an exceptionally challenging situation, with dozens of warning signals going off.
Soulas noted that manufacturers had known for years about problems with the plane’s speed sensors – called pitot tubes – freezing over, but didn’t order the faulty models systematically replaced until after the crash.
He said the “inappropriate behavior of the pilots” was prompted by “indication errors.” He also said pilots should have had better training.
Pilot Gerard Arnoux defended the pilots’ actions, saying they were doing what they had been taught to do.
“A normal pilot on a normal airliner follows” the signals on the flight director system, which tells them to go left, right, up or down, he said.
The BEA’s findings in a preliminary report last year raised worrisome questions about the reactions of the two co-pilots as the A330 went into an aerodynamic stall, and their ability to fly manually as the autopilot disengaged. Broader concerns were raised about training for pilots worldwide flying high-tech planes when confronted with a high-altitude crisis.
The final report included a study of the plane’s black box flight recorders, uncovered in a costly and extraordinarily complex search in the ocean depths.
In a separate French judicial investigation still under way, Air France and Airbus have been handed preliminary manslaughter charges.




























React to the article
(5) Reactions
???????????
the two pilots at the controls, never understood, ?? what was happening... that the plane was in a stall ?? This is unbelievable ... Do you fly by feeling or what. You can feel the plane is stalling,, Your stomach would be on the ceiling .. and you would increase power for sure. if not, you had no right to call your self a pilot.
Rio-Paris Air France crash report calls for tougher rules & Trg.
The pilots are not to blame. Why the defective instruments were allowed to be in operation? It is a case of absolute callousness and lack of concern for human safety. Those responsible should be tried for manslaughter.
Why didn't they use their Gyroscope?
I would like to know why the pilots didn't use their gyroscope to understand how the airplane was positioned relative the surface? Or didn't the airplane have a gyroscope? Is this not a sound solution to the problems the airplane encountered? Why is no one talking about this?
Lack of Pilot Training and Malfunction of Cheap Airspeed Sensors
This Airbus A330-203 did not have multiple independent systems for detecting speed of the aircraft such as a GPS based system that would at least cross check the readings being given by the pitot tubes and then provide a cockpit warning that the airspeed could be wrong, or another safety mechanism whereby the pitot tubes are heated as long as this would not impact the reading so that ice could not occlude them.
Pilots lack of familiarity and training along with system malfunction contributed to this terrible accident.
To recover from deep stall is to set engine to idle to reduce nose up side effect and try full nose down input. If no success roll the aircraft to above 60° bank angle and rudder input to lower the nose in a steep engaged turn. Practicing recovery from "Loss of Control" situations should be mandatory part of recurrent training
AF447
Pitot tubes frequently freeze and training for that is provided for by the simulators. It's the pilot error here that is the most concerning. Unbelievable incompetence as far as I can see. I'd like to hear how AF are going to make sure that all their pilots are properly trained after this.