- Join the France 24 community here
- Log in
Latest update: 18/09/2012
- France - media - privacy - UK
French court bans topless photos of Kate Middleton
A French court on Tuesday ordered French magazine Closer to return topless photos taken of Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton while on holiday in France and has banned their further publication.
A French court has ordered a magazine publisher to return all digital files of topless photos of the duchess of Cambridge within 24 hours.
The weekly magazine Closer is also forbidden to continue to publish the images of the duke and duchess of Cambridge’s private moments, including on its website and in its tablet application. The magazine printed 14 photos of the duchess last week that show her sunbathing topless while on holiday in southern France, taken with a telephoto lens.
Under the ruling, Closer faces a daily fine of €10,000 if it fails to hand over the photos.
“These snapshots which showed the intimacy of a couple, partially naked on the terrace of a private home, surrounded by a park several hundred metres from a public road, and being able to legitimately assume that they are protected from passersby, are by nature particularly intrusive,” the French ruling decreed. “[They] were thus subjected to this brutal display the moment the cover appeared.”
The case is the first of two legal actions filed by the British royals. In a reflection of just how intent they are on protecting their privacy – and likely dissuading paparazzi from future ventures – the royal couple have also initiated criminal proceedings over the topless pictures with the aim of securing the prosecution of Closer's editor and the photographer who took the pictures.
A French prosecutor on Tuesday began a preliminary investigation into the criminal complaint.
Christopher Mesnooh, an American lawyer who works in Paris, said French law strongly protects privacy rights but tabloids have their own reasons for publication, even when they might be in violation of the law.
“It appears to give satisfaction entirely to the royal couple,” Mesnooh said of Tuesday’s ruling. “The problem with this kind of decision is that the horse got out of the barn a long time ago.”
It is too late for the royal family to block the photos' international publication, as publications in Ireland and Italy have already published them. Tuesday’s ruling only affects the French publisher.
(FRANCE 24 with wires)




























React to the article
(8) Reactions
Ban???
Why you ban photos of topless Duchess (which I respect as decision and I am against taking photos of people without them knowing whether topless or not) and you do not ban photos of the prophets or videos made to harm the prophets. Where is your freedom of expression here, did you forget it or just because you are worried the royal family gets angry. I would say better you get worried from Allah (God) and do right thing always.
Kate M.
I agree completely! The jerk paparazzi do this all over America.. To include an allied nation just to boost editorial $$$ is slime in the making. Don't worry Kate, you're bigger fans will look away.
French court bans topless photos of Kate Middleton
French court bans topless photos of Kate Middleton to protect the rights of the individual. French court allow cartoons be published to protect another freedom, freedom of speech.
When will the right to freedom of speech be taken away from us?
Huh
Then i just wonder why do they allow another French magazine to post cartoons of prophet Mohammad even thou they know the impact of such an act beside shutting down their interest among 20 countries as a result of this .
This is an irony and contradiction for what they are naming " Freedom " .
freedom of speech!!!!
why can't disrespectful cartoon of Muhammad be banned...
The Duchess Topless
Who actually cares?
Those pics!!
This case was to put a marker down at the outset on the first occasion that such behaviour by photographers would not be tolerated. These pictures are not in the public interest but only for making money, large amounts of it, for the magazine/paper and the photographer.
Put into context, if I took pics of my neighbour sunbathing in his back yard from my upstairs window and published them I would be quite rightly charged in the UK as a 'peeping tom' and no doubt other laws being broken as well. Just because they are royals doesn't mean that they should be subjected to the same thing and the photographer and others get off scot free. They knew there was a financial risk, they have been rumbled and now have to pay the price for it. The old excuse of 'in the public interest' does not work - there have been to many other occasions when this comment has been used. It is all down to selling more copies - pure and simple.
banned photos?
Talk about subservient slave attitude and censorship... Freedom of speech anyone?