Latest update: 21/12/2012 

- guns - shootings - USA


NRA chief calls for armed guards in every US school

The US’ leading pro-gun lobbying group, the National Rifle Association, proposed that armed guards be placed in American schools on Friday, rejecting calls for tougher gun control laws one week after a tragic shooting at a school in Connecticut.

By Katerina VITTOZZI (video)
News Wires (text)
 

The United States' most powerful pro-gun lobbying group demanded Friday that armed police be deployed to every school in the country following a mass shooting that left 20 young children dead.

The National Rifle Association, which defends what it sees as US citizens' constitutional right to bear arms, had been under pressure to respond in the wake of last week's massacre.

But NRA leaders, in a combative and determined public appearance, ceded no ground to those calling for tougher gun laws.

"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," declared NRA vice-president Wayne LaPierre, in the group's first reaction since the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

NRA calls on Congress to put armed guards in US schools

"I call on Congress today to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation," he said, in a lengthy statement. He took no questions from reporters.

LaPierre said the NRA was ready to help train security teams for schools and work with teachers and parents to improve security measures, and accused the media and the political class of demonizing gun owners.

On Friday, a troubled 20-year-old man burst into the Sandy Hook school and gunned down 20 six- and seven-year-old children and six staff members trying to protect them, before taking his own life.

The massacre was only the latest in a series of mass shootings in the United States this year, and prompted President Barack Obama to throw his weight behind plans to revive a ban on assault weapons.

America has suffered an epidemic of gun violence over the last three decades including 62 mass shooting incidents since 1982. The vast majority of weapons used have been semi-automatic weapons obtained legally by the killers.

There were an estimated 310 million non-military firearms in the United States in 2009, roughly one per citizen, and people in America are 20 times more likely to be killed by a gun than someone in another developed country.

But LaPierre insisted gun ownership was not the problem.

"You know, five years ago after the Virginia Tech tragedy when I said we should put armed security in every school, the media called me crazy," he said, referring to a 2007 campus shooting that left 32 people dead.

"But what if, what if when Adam Lanza started shooting his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School last Friday he'd been confronted by qualified armed security?" he demanded.

"Will you at least admit it's possible that 26 little kids -- that 26 innocent lives might have been spared that day? Is it so abhorrent to you that you'd rather continue to risk the alternative?"

The statement did not impress Chris Murphy, the congressman who represents the district that includes the school.

"Walking out of another funeral and was handed the NRA transcript. The most revolting, tone deaf statement I've ever seen," he said, on Twitter.

And the statement immediately drew criticism from supporters of tougher gun control, who are pushing to ban semi-automatic assault weapons like the .223 Bushmaster rifle that Lanza used in Friday's shooting.

"The NRA leadership's drive to fill our schools with more deadly guns and ammo is wildly out of touch with responsible gun owners and the American public," New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg said.

The protesters that attempted to drown out LaPierre's statement were more blunt. One bore a banner reading "NRA kills our kids" the other "NRA has blood on its hands." They were led away by security.

But LaPierre ploughed on, warning that more killers are actively plotting to attack schools.

Syndicate contentCONNECTICUT SCHOOL SHOOTING

And he slammed and attacked media conglomerates, denouncing violent video games, music videos that celebrate crime and Hollywood movies that glamorize violence.

"Isn't fantasizing about killing people as a way to get your kicks really the filthiest form of pornography?" he demanded.

"Too many in the national media, their corporate owners and their stockholders act as silent enablers, if not complicit co-conspirators. Rather than face their own moral failings, the media demonize gun owners."

(AFP)

Read more
React to the article
Comment this article typing your message in the above text zone. Please note that this is limited to 1500 characters or less.
(6) Reactions

Liberal compassion at it's

Liberal compassion at it's best -

Anti-2nd people want to kill pro-2nd people:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/02/liberal-ex-columnist-death-threats-published-in-des-moines-register/

The Constitution of the

The Constitution of the United States could not be more explicit. Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.

Why would anyone be opposed to security in every school? Any other approach could take decades if ever successful at all. This is a case that since the NRA proposed it, it must be wrong, not a result of clear thinking/

Gun control kills Notice how

Gun control kills
Notice how those who propose a UK style gun ban fail to mention how crime rates rose drastically afterwards? Liberal memory is quite selective indeed!
A word for the completely ignorant - D.C. v. Heller affirmed the fact that U.S. Citizens have a right to own a firearm, regardless of their service in "a militia." The only reason that qualification ever came up is because liberal collectivists allowed a certain President to begin asking the question "why do you need this certain right." This person was also the first leader since King George to refer to U.S. Citizens as "subjects" in an official declaration.

Chicago v. MacDonald forced

Chicago v. MacDonald forced the States to recognize that right as they do all of the others. Not that it matters, as in good, utopists crime free places like NYC, Illinois, and California, those basic rights are ignored -- again based on "need."
Home protection simply spawned the suits. It has absolutely nothing to do with the meat of the decisions. Not that misguided fools like collectivist liberals would read into those intricacies or anything.
Fact is ; none of your rights are qualified by "need." If they were, I can guarantee you that liberals would be one of the first to have their internet connection yanked out.
The US Constitution was (and is) unique because, at the time it was written, it was the only social contract of note that specifically prohibited a government from acting. Those who wrote it weren't idiots. They wrote the Bill of Rights specifically to ensure that a centralized government would never have the arbitrary power enjoyed by the agents of the British Crown. The job wasn't done once the Revolution ended. There isn't a sunset clause in there. The people who wrote that document understood Lord Acton's principle in full: absolute power corrupts absolutely. That is why the government is theoretically limited in its powers (though collectivists sure do a fine job of mucking it up).

The easy availability of guns

The easy availability of guns is the reason for these masses murders. After the terrible school shooting in Dunblane, Scotland, in 1996, Great Britain enacted several laws that effectively made owning handguns illegal in that country. Also Ireland banned gunsfor
personal use after a school massacre. These country have shown this
is the right way to go. The NRA is wrong, guards in school will only
increase the violence, they just want to make money. I grew in a country where you saw armed guards everywhere, because of the conflicts with the FARC in schools, parks, government buildings etc.
Children should not live that way, it takes away their innocents and
childhood. Scotland 79, Ireland 54, or are we in the USA to became like Mexico 25,757, and Colombia 15,459 where lawless rules and easy availability of guns exist

The NRA response is crazy.

The NRA response is crazy. They seem to be saying let the number of weapons out there multiply, let the people who can buy and use them be allowed to grow and grow but give the teachers a gun. Repealing the second amendment would be a far better approach.

Close