Open

Coming up

Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

IN THE PAPERS

Socialist Party summer conference kicks off in explosive atmosphere

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Canada and Russia exchange snarky tweets

Read more

AFRICA NEWS

Ebola in Nigeria: First death outside of Lagos

Read more

AFRICA NEWS

Niger: Top opposition figure to be questioned in baby-trafficking scandal

Read more

AFRICA NEWS

Liberia: President dismisses top officials who ignored call to return home

Read more

BUSINESS DAILY

Google rivals Amazon with delivery drone tests

Read more

DEBATE

How to Stop Ebola: WHO Says Cases Could Exceed 20,000 (part 2)

Read more

DEBATE

How to Stop Ebola: WHO Says Cases Could Exceed 20,000

Read more

DEBATE

US-Africa summit: Obama unveils $33 billion US investment plan for Africa

Read more

  • Ukraine death toll mounts as Kiev plans to join NATO

    Read more

  • France shines in IMF list of world’s promising economists

    Read more

  • Obama has 'no strategy yet' on potential Syria strikes

    Read more

  • Netflix to woo French with ‘House of Cards’ set in Marseille

    Read more

  • Mapping Ukraine: Canada and Russia in ‘tweet for tat’ row

    Read more

  • French businesses ‘hoping for a new Thatcher’

    Read more

  • Syrian refugees surpass 3 million, UN says

    Read more

  • West backs Ukrainian claims of Russian incursion

    Read more

  • Libyan PM resigns as Islamists set up rival administration

    Read more

  • UN says 43 peacekeepers captured in Golan Heights

    Read more

  • The deleted tweets of Manuel Valls

    Read more

  • Peru seizes record 6.5 tonnes of Europe-bound cocaine

    Read more

  • Pakistan army to mediate between PM, protesters

    Read more

  • PSG face Barcelona, Ajax in tough Champions League draw

    Read more

  • In pictures: Billions of locusts invade Madagascan capital

    Read more

  • Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie say ‘I do’ in France

    Read more

  • Erdogan sworn in as Turkey's president

    Read more

  • Assad cannot be partner in fight against terrorism, says Hollande

    Read more

  • Video: 'Neither Baghdad nor the US can defeat the Islamic State'

    Read more

Middle east

World backs attack on Syria, but may not stomach a quagmire

© Photo: AFP

Text by HAARETZ

Latest update : 2013-08-28

As world leaders rally in support of a US-led military intervention in Syria, Haaretz looks at the regional implications of the looming conflict and what options the Bashar al-Assad regime will be left with once the bombs begin to fall.

The United States could not have hoped for a better international coalition for the anticipated attack on Syria.

The Arab League has offered sweeping support, as has Turkey, and there are even voices in favor from Iran, which has been careful to avoid saying whether it will intervene in Syria’s defense. All these things have made it clear to Washington — and Damascus — that an attack will be received with understanding, if not near-total support. Perhaps the most visible proof of the acknowledgment that Syria has broken all the conventional rules of warfare is the response of Russia, whose foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, announced, “Russia will not go to war with any side if there should be an attack.”

The international legitimacy is based on the belief that an attack by the U.S. (perhaps together with British and French forces) will be measured, clean and with a low number of losses. But past experience has already proven that there is no such thing as a clean attack with no losses.

The American military has a bank of targets based partly on a list of 35 sites that the Syrian opposition and the Free Syrian Army would like to bombard. The list includes the headquarters of the Fourth Armored Division near Damascus, the headquarters of the Presidential Guard, the stockpiles of chemical weapons and the headquarters of the First and Seventh Divisions, which control passage from Daraa to Damascus. The list also contains several army bases near Latakia so that troops from the Free Syrian Army will be able to take control over the coastal district and move relatively easily toward Damascus from the south.

The opposition hopes the American attack will not stop at a surgical punitive action against the chemical-weapons bases, but will give the Free Syrian Army the strategic advantage it needs to win the war. But that sort of ambitious attack could also be the breaking point of the international consensus, when Russia and Iran are liable to move from rhetoric regarding the red lines they have drawn to action.

The open preparations for an attack also give Syria time to prepare, reduce the damage it could suffer, and even sabotage the attack’s legitimacy. For example, Bashar Assad could concentrate civilians in targeted areas, as Saddam Hussein did, to increase the number of casualties and portray the attackers as war criminals.

The American administration has determined not only that chemical weapons were used, but that the Syrian army carried out the attack. It is less certain whether Assad gave the order, or whether high-ranking army officials decided on their own to carry out a chemical attack. If the latter possibility is the correct one, it would not be far-fetched to expect that the same officials would expand the use of chemical weapons to prove the non-validity of the attack on Syria.

The accepted belief is that Assad will not respond to an attack by firing missiles at its neighbors, particularly Israel, so as not to give it a pretext to join the fight against him. But a threat by Syria’s spokesmen to attack Jordan could turn out to be real, particularly since the Syrian regime sees Jordan as a base for Western and Arab military activity against it.

Turkey could be another Syrian target — particularly the encampments of Syrian refugees near the border. Turkey, which is about to declare a state of war with Syria, has a strong army that is preparing for an attack. Since Syria’s considerations about attacking Turkey are the same ones about attacking Israel, the current belief is that Turkey will not be part of the battle, either.

But beyond these tactical assessments, a Western attack will thrust Syria into the position of a country fighting for its life — not against rebels from within, but against the world. In this new position, the regime has several options: to surrender honorably to an enemy that is many times stronger, to fight everyone with all the means at its disposal to turn the local war into a multi-national one, or to lie low and wait for the attack to end so it can go back to its routine of war against the rebels. Syria’s choice will become clear when the American missiles start flying.

By Zvi Bar'el.

Read this article on Haaretz.com.

© Read premium content from leading Israeli daily Haaretz on FRANCE 24

Date created : 2013-08-28

  • SYRIA

    Syria warns of ‘surprise’ military capabilities

    Read more

  • SYRIA

    Biden says ‘no doubt’ Assad behind chemical attack

    Read more

  • SYRIA-VIDEO

    Damascus residents remain 'sceptical' on US strikes

    Read more

COMMENT(S)