The UN Security Council is expected to vote late on Friday on a resolution that would demand the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons. US President Barack Obama said an accord would be a “potentially huge victory for the international community”.
President Barack Obama said on Friday a U.N. Security Council draft resolution brokered by the United States and Russia that would demand Syria give up its chemical arms was “a potentially huge victory for the international community.”
The resolution, agreed on Thursday, would not threaten military force if Syria fails to comply.
A vote on the resolution is expected later on Friday.
Obama said the agreement was something the United States had long sought and likely would not have been achieved without a credible threat of U.S. force after the chemical weapons attack on a suburb of Damascus on Aug. 21 that killed scores of Syrian civilians, including children.
SYRIA'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS
- Assad regime regains total control of Syrian city of Homs
- US strikes on Syria threaten latest round of peace talks in Geneva
- Syrian delegations weigh UN plan for new constitution
- Trump and Erdogan sidestep row over Kurdish fighters during key meeting
- US accuses Syrian regime of using 'crematorium' to cover up mass killings
- Trump's Firing Line: FBI director sacked as Russia probe gets warmer (part 1)
- Syria’s Assad vows to keep fighting, criticises Trump over missile attack
- Kurdish Offensive: Turkey furious over US arming of Syrian Kurds (part 2)
- Kurdish Offensive: Turkey furious over US arming of Syrian Kurds (part 1)
- US-backed Syrian militias capture territory in push on Raqqa
- French intelligence says Syrian regime behind disputed chemical attack
- Trump's intervention in Syria: How should the EU respond?
- How ransoms, Syria deals secured Qatari hostage releases
- Syrian evacuations resume after harrowing 48-hour delay
- Sarin or similar toxin used in deadly Syria attack, watchdog says
- Opposition Syrian National Coalition names new PM
- Obama says US ‘prepared to act’ if Syria deal fails
- US, Russia reach deal on Syria's chemical arms
- UN chief ‘sceptical’ of Assad chemical arms claims
- Syria reportedly scattering its chemical arms
- The challenge of dismantling Syria’s chemical weapons
“The fact that we now have a framework ... that would be legally binding, that would be verifiable and enforceable, where there would be consequences for Syria’s failure to meet what has been set forth in this resolution, I think is a potentially huge victory for the international community,” Obama said at the White House, where he was meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Obama said the resolution would deter future use of chemical weapons in Syria and go beyond what military action could have achieved by removing one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world.
He said the United States was hopeful about what could be accomplished as a result of the U.N. resolution, but that a lot of work was still required and skepticism was well placed.
“I think rightly, people have been concerned about whether Syria will follow through on the commitments that have been laid forth, and I think there are legitimate concerns as to how technically we are going to be getting those chemical weapons out while there is still fighting going on,” Obama said.
“Nevertheless, this represents potentially a significant step forward.”
The agreement emerged from intense negotiations at the United Nations with Russia, an ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.
A major sticking point was Russia’s opposition to writing the resolution under Chapter 7 of the U.N. charter, which covers the council’s authority to enforce its decisions with measures that include sanctions or military force.
The draft resolution makes the measure legally binding but provides no means for automatic enforcement if Syria fails to comply.
Date created : 2013-09-27