The UN Security Council is expected to vote late on Friday on a resolution that would demand the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons. US President Barack Obama said an accord would be a “potentially huge victory for the international community”.
President Barack Obama said on Friday a U.N. Security Council draft resolution brokered by the United States and Russia that would demand Syria give up its chemical arms was “a potentially huge victory for the international community.”
The resolution, agreed on Thursday, would not threaten military force if Syria fails to comply.
A vote on the resolution is expected later on Friday.
Obama said the agreement was something the United States had long sought and likely would not have been achieved without a credible threat of U.S. force after the chemical weapons attack on a suburb of Damascus on Aug. 21 that killed scores of Syrian civilians, including children.
SYRIA'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS
- Kurdish courtrooms put former terrorists on trial
- UN Security Council unanimously backs 30-day ceasefire in Syria
- Syrian teen's war selfies draw attention and criticism
- Far left on the front lines: The Westerners joining the Kurds' fight in Syria (Part 1 of 2)
- The business of war: Russian mercenaries in Syria
- Gun Control in the United States: Will the Florida shooting be the turning point?
- Hopes for Syria ceasefire fade as Russia opposes UN deal
- 'Powerless in Syria' or 'Complicit in the bombings'?
- Royal gatecrasher! Queen Elizabeth attends London Fashion Week
- More civilians killed as assault on rebel-held Eastern Ghouta escalates
- Afrin, 'a war without images'
- Syria on the brink: Can Assad help the Kurds against Turkish forces?
- Pro-Assad forces in Afrin targeted by Turkey
- Turkey will attack Syria's Afrin 'in the coming days', Erdogan says
- Turkey’s Afrin assault wins Syrian Kurds unlikely friends
- Opposition Syrian National Coalition names new PM
- Obama says US ‘prepared to act’ if Syria deal fails
- US, Russia reach deal on Syria's chemical arms
- UN chief ‘sceptical’ of Assad chemical arms claims
- Syria reportedly scattering its chemical arms
- The challenge of dismantling Syria’s chemical weapons
“The fact that we now have a framework ... that would be legally binding, that would be verifiable and enforceable, where there would be consequences for Syria’s failure to meet what has been set forth in this resolution, I think is a potentially huge victory for the international community,” Obama said at the White House, where he was meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Obama said the resolution would deter future use of chemical weapons in Syria and go beyond what military action could have achieved by removing one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world.
He said the United States was hopeful about what could be accomplished as a result of the U.N. resolution, but that a lot of work was still required and skepticism was well placed.
“I think rightly, people have been concerned about whether Syria will follow through on the commitments that have been laid forth, and I think there are legitimate concerns as to how technically we are going to be getting those chemical weapons out while there is still fighting going on,” Obama said.
“Nevertheless, this represents potentially a significant step forward.”
The agreement emerged from intense negotiations at the United Nations with Russia, an ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.
A major sticking point was Russia’s opposition to writing the resolution under Chapter 7 of the U.N. charter, which covers the council’s authority to enforce its decisions with measures that include sanctions or military force.
The draft resolution makes the measure legally binding but provides no means for automatic enforcement if Syria fails to comply.
Date created : 2013-09-27