The UN Security Council is expected to vote late on Friday on a resolution that would demand the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons. US President Barack Obama said an accord would be a “potentially huge victory for the international community”.
President Barack Obama said on Friday a U.N. Security Council draft resolution brokered by the United States and Russia that would demand Syria give up its chemical arms was “a potentially huge victory for the international community.”
The resolution, agreed on Thursday, would not threaten military force if Syria fails to comply.
A vote on the resolution is expected later on Friday.
Obama said the agreement was something the United States had long sought and likely would not have been achieved without a credible threat of U.S. force after the chemical weapons attack on a suburb of Damascus on Aug. 21 that killed scores of Syrian civilians, including children.
SYRIA'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS
- Video: The cult of Kobane’s martyrs
- Lebanon: Syrian civil war spillover heightens tensions in Tripoli
- After many delays, first group of Iraqi peshmerga enter Kobane
- The battle for Kobane: Peshmerga, FSA join fight against IS group (part 2)
- The battle for Kobane: Peshmerga, FSA join fight against IS group
- Iraqi Kurds arrive in Syria for fight against IS group
- Iran will not join 'untrustworthy' coalition against IS group
- Iraqi Kurd fighters join fight against IS group in Syria
- Aleppo: A city in ruins
- Germany: Bavaria struggles to cope with influx of asylum seekers
- US urges online fight against Islamic State group
- IS group bids to cut off Kobane, Iraqi Kurds ready to join fight
- A sacred volcano threatened in Hawaii, and transforming bombs into tools in Sudan
- Anti-IS group fighters: When foreigners join the fight against jihadists
- IS group intensifies assault on Syria’s Kobane
- Opposition Syrian National Coalition names new PM
- Obama says US ‘prepared to act’ if Syria deal fails
- US, Russia reach deal on Syria's chemical arms
- UN chief ‘sceptical’ of Assad chemical arms claims
- Syria reportedly scattering its chemical arms
- The challenge of dismantling Syria’s chemical weapons
“The fact that we now have a framework ... that would be legally binding, that would be verifiable and enforceable, where there would be consequences for Syria’s failure to meet what has been set forth in this resolution, I think is a potentially huge victory for the international community,” Obama said at the White House, where he was meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Obama said the resolution would deter future use of chemical weapons in Syria and go beyond what military action could have achieved by removing one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world.
He said the United States was hopeful about what could be accomplished as a result of the U.N. resolution, but that a lot of work was still required and skepticism was well placed.
“I think rightly, people have been concerned about whether Syria will follow through on the commitments that have been laid forth, and I think there are legitimate concerns as to how technically we are going to be getting those chemical weapons out while there is still fighting going on,” Obama said.
“Nevertheless, this represents potentially a significant step forward.”
The agreement emerged from intense negotiations at the United Nations with Russia, an ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.
A major sticking point was Russia’s opposition to writing the resolution under Chapter 7 of the U.N. charter, which covers the council’s authority to enforce its decisions with measures that include sanctions or military force.
The draft resolution makes the measure legally binding but provides no means for automatic enforcement if Syria fails to comply.
Date created : 2013-09-27