The UN Security Council is expected to vote late on Friday on a resolution that would demand the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons. US President Barack Obama said an accord would be a “potentially huge victory for the international community”.
President Barack Obama said on Friday a U.N. Security Council draft resolution brokered by the United States and Russia that would demand Syria give up its chemical arms was “a potentially huge victory for the international community.”
The resolution, agreed on Thursday, would not threaten military force if Syria fails to comply.
A vote on the resolution is expected later on Friday.
Obama said the agreement was something the United States had long sought and likely would not have been achieved without a credible threat of U.S. force after the chemical weapons attack on a suburb of Damascus on Aug. 21 that killed scores of Syrian civilians, including children.
SYRIA'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS
- Assad wants France to stop ‘supporting terrorists’ in Syria
- Aleppo residents 'left to fend for themselves'
- Syria: Meeting IS group prisoners captured by Kurdish forces
- Yarmouk tragedy is proof of a 'clear failure of Palestinian leadership'
- Modi in France: India Orders 36 Rafale Fighter Jets (part 2)
- On Your Marks... Clinton to Announce Presidential Bid (part 1)
- Is Assad’s Syrian army in trouble?
- Syria: The Yarmouk camp battleground
- UN considers evacuating Yarmouk refugee camp in IS group stronghold
- Islamist militants kidnap then release 300 Kurds in Syria
- Assad’s female fighters: Progress or propaganda?
- Syrian rebels capture main border crossing with Jordan
- Islamic State group seizes Palestinian refugee camp in Syria
- Four out of five Syrians live in poverty, UN chief says
- Syria faces new Islamist threat as civil war enters fifth year
- Opposition Syrian National Coalition names new PM
- Obama says US ‘prepared to act’ if Syria deal fails
- US, Russia reach deal on Syria's chemical arms
- UN chief ‘sceptical’ of Assad chemical arms claims
- Syria reportedly scattering its chemical arms
- The challenge of dismantling Syria’s chemical weapons
“The fact that we now have a framework ... that would be legally binding, that would be verifiable and enforceable, where there would be consequences for Syria’s failure to meet what has been set forth in this resolution, I think is a potentially huge victory for the international community,” Obama said at the White House, where he was meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Obama said the resolution would deter future use of chemical weapons in Syria and go beyond what military action could have achieved by removing one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world.
He said the United States was hopeful about what could be accomplished as a result of the U.N. resolution, but that a lot of work was still required and skepticism was well placed.
“I think rightly, people have been concerned about whether Syria will follow through on the commitments that have been laid forth, and I think there are legitimate concerns as to how technically we are going to be getting those chemical weapons out while there is still fighting going on,” Obama said.
“Nevertheless, this represents potentially a significant step forward.”
The agreement emerged from intense negotiations at the United Nations with Russia, an ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.
A major sticking point was Russia’s opposition to writing the resolution under Chapter 7 of the U.N. charter, which covers the council’s authority to enforce its decisions with measures that include sanctions or military force.
The draft resolution makes the measure legally binding but provides no means for automatic enforcement if Syria fails to comply.
Date created : 2013-09-27