Don't miss




At least 12 presidential guards killed in bomb attack in Tunis

Read more


Grand coalition, who with? (part 2)

Read more


Grand coalition, who with? (part 1)

Read more


Taiwan fortress-island faces tourist invasion

Read more


Generation YouTube: Troye Sivan chats music, movies and social media

Read more


The perils of Burma's billion-dollar jade trade

Read more


'The Salafist breeding ground'

Read more


Clinton and Trump agree - on taxing big companies

Read more


Macina liberation front also claims responsibility for Bamako hotel attack

Read more


Texas judge orders end to life support for brain-dead pregnant woman


Text by FRANCE 24

Latest update : 2014-01-25

A judge on Friday ordered a Texas hospital to remove life support for a pregnant, brain-dead woman whose family had argued that she would not want to be kept in that condition.

The judge issued the ruling in the case of Marlise Munoz, who was being kept alive in a Fort Worth hospital against her family’s wishes. The judge gave the hospital until 5 p.m. Monday (2300 GMT) to remove life support.

“This was a sad situation all around,” said Heather King, Munoz's lawyer. "We are relieved that Erick Munoz can now move forward with the process of burying his wife."

The case has raised questions about end-of-life care and whether a pregnant woman who is considered legally and medically dead should be kept on life support for the sake of a foetus. It also has caught the attention of both sides of the abortion debate, with anti-abortion groups arguing Munoz’s foetus deserves a chance to be born.

Munoz was 14 weeks pregnant with the couple’s second child when her husband found her unconscious Nov. 26, possibly due to a blood clot.

Erick Munoz says he and his wife are paramedics who were clear about not wanting life support in this type of situation. His attorney argued that keeping the woman alive would set a dangerous precedent for similar cases in the future.

“It’s not a matter of pro-choice and pro-life,” Mrs. Munoz’s mother, Lynne Machado, told The New York Times. “It’s about a matter of our daughter’s wishes not being honoured by the state of Texas.”

Legal battle

John Peter Smith Hospital maintained it had to protect the life of the unborn child. Hospital officials said they were bound by a state law prohibiting withdrawal of treatment from a pregnant patient. Several experts interviewed by The Associated Press have said the hospital was misapplying the law.

The hospital said in a statement Friday that it “appreciates the potential impact of the consequences of the order on all parties involved” and was deciding whether to appeal.

Earlier this week, Erick Munoz’s attorneys said the foetus, now believed to be at about 22 weeks’ gestation, is “distinctly abnormal.” The attorneys said they based that statement on medical records they received from the hospital.

The local district attorney’s office, which is representing the hospital in the lawsuit, said the hospital was expected to issue a statement later Friday in response to the ruling.

Medical precedent

Not much is known about foetal survival when mothers suffer brain death during pregnancy. German doctors who searched for such cases found 30 instances of survival over nearly 30 years, according to an article published in the journal BMC Medicine in 2010.

But those mothers were further along in pregnancy, 22 weeks on average, when brain death occurred.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

Date created : 2014-01-25

  • USA

    US Supreme Court declines to block Texas abortion law

    Read more

  • USA

    Texas Senate passes 20-week abortion ban

    Read more


    Ireland to allow abortions in life-threatening cases

    Read more