Don't miss




After key battle, Syrian town of Kobane looks to the future

Read more


'War is not an option,' says former FARC guerrilla leader

Read more


Madagascar political crisis: top court orders formation of unity government

Read more


Ireland's abortion referendum

Read more


Weinstein in court; Ireland abortion vote; Italy's populist takeover

Read more


Sugar and spice: The flavours of the French Caribbean

Read more


The French are so rude! Or are they?

Read more


The writing's on the wall: Revolutionary posters from May 68

Read more


'We heard there might be a civil war': May 68 seen from abroad

Read more


Afghans vote in run-off election despite threat of violence


Text by FRANCE 24

Latest update : 2014-06-14

Afghans defied threats by the Taliban to vote in a second round of presidential elections on Saturday, in a decisive test of the country’s ambitions to transfer power democratically for the first time in its history.

The choice to replace President Hamid Karzai was between anti-Taliban fighter Abdullah Abdullah and former World Bank economist Ashraf Ghani, after neither candidate secured the 50 percent majority needed to win outright in the first round on April 5.

Despite a series of rocket barrages and other scattered attacks that Interior Minister Mohammad Umar Daudzai said killed 46 people, the voting was largely peaceful.

Independent Election Commission Chairman Ahmad Yousuf Nouristani said initial estimates show that more than 7 million Afghans voted – a turnout of around 60 percent and similar to that of the first round.

Observers had expected fewer than 5 million voters this time, partly due to security concerns, and the high turnout in both rounds will be seen as a major defeat for the Taliban.

“Afghan people always rise from the ashes to face challenges. Today is one such challenge and we will rise to the occasion,” said Arash Yarmand, an electrical engineer preparing to cast his vote in Kabul.

“There’s a lot of expectations from the new government and we hope they live up to it.”

With most foreign troops set to leave Afghanistan by the end of 2014, whoever takes over from Karzai will inherit a troubled country with an increasingly violent Taliban insurgency and an economy crippled by corruption and the weak rule of law.

The election has so far been fraught with accusations of fraud by both candidates and many fear a close outcome will make it less likely the loser will accept defeat, possibly dragging Afghanistan into a protracted stand-off over the vote.

Independent Election Commission chief Ahmad Yousuf Nuristani sought to reassure voters and observers they would ensure the process would deliver a legitimate winner.

“We have zero tolerance for fraud and if we detect any case of election staff working in favour of a candidate, they will be sacked immediately,” he said.

The Taliban, now at the height of their summer offensive, had warned people not to vote in an election they have condemned as a US-sponsored charade.

On June 6, Abdullah survived an assassination attempt when two bombs exploded outside a Kabul hotel where he had just held a rally. Twelve people were killed.

“This time, the Taliban will try to compensate for what they couldn’t achieve in the first round,” Defence Ministry spokesman General Zahir Azimi said before the vote.

Ethnic lines

Officials in Kabul are haunted by the prospect of a close outcome that could furnish the losing candidate and his supporters with an excuse to reject defeat, and, in the worst case scenario, propel the country back into war along ethnic lines.

Both candidates set the stage for complaints repeatedly accusing electoral organisers of incompetence and bias.

“Some of the teams openly played ethnic politics and that is not good for the country,” said Habibi Aminullah, former campaign manager to Qayum Karzai, the president’s brother, who was a candidate in the first round.

“I hope the election ends at a point in which no violence takes place. I hope the international community helps.”

The United Nations has appealed to candidates to refrain from attacking the organisers to safeguard the process.

“There’s a short-term gain only in trying to undermine or bully the institutions at the expense of their legitimacy,” said United Nations deputy chief Nicholas Haysom.

“It’s going to be the legitimacy of the elections which will give legitimacy to the new head.”

Abdullah polled 14 percentage points ahead of Ghani in the first round with 45 percent of the vote, but Ghani, who is ethnic Pashtun, stands to gain a portion of the Pashtun vote that was splintered in the first round.

Pashtuns are Afghanistan’s biggest ethnic group, making up about 45 percent of the population. While Abdullah is partly Pashtun, he is identified more with the ethnic Tajik minority.

The chances of an equal split between candidates are hard to gauge because there are few reliable polls. ACSOR research centre, asking respondents to choose between Abdullah and Ghani, predicted a 50:50 split shortly before the first round.


Date created : 2014-06-14


    Afghan presidential front-runner Abdullah survives bomb attack

    Read more


    Afghanistan’s Abdullah calls for ‘responsible’ US exit plan

    Read more


    US to keep almost 10,000 troops in Afghanistan after 2014

    Read more